I
have no idea when this dates from and cannot distinguish what is true
and what is false. There is, however, a lot more happening behind the
scenes than we are aware of.
Black-PR campaign posts going around recently trying to suppress submissions to WikiLeaks. False, but who benefits?
Here
are all the comments from the Wikileaks poster on 8chan confirming
our worst fears. SPREAD THIS
There is also this which I have not had a chance to look at.
Make up your own mind.
▶ d76cd5 No.8294899>>8294985 >>8295066 >>8295355 >>8295794 >>8295905 >>8296055 >>8296436>>8296911 >>8297118 >>8298631 >>8298768 >>8302650 >>8302681 >>8303813 >>8305386 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Continuing the debate about the interview…
On the 5th of November 2016, RT aired and published the Full interview of Julian Assange called “Secret World of US Election”.
I have the following questions:
1. Why don't we see an establishing shot of both John and Julian (both in one frame)?
2. Why is there a Morph Cut* (NOT mpeg4 artifacts) at 15:08 and another one at 18:47? (see embedded video)
3. After the Morph Cut at 18:47, Julian talks about the “attempted squeeze”. Was that really part of the answer to the “Internet Being Cut” question or was it (part of an answer to some other question) edited for “proof of life” reasons?
4. If reason for the morph cuts were that Julian had to cough or clear his voice, then why did they leave it in at 01:36?
5. At 20:55 and 22:15 you can hear a screeching background noise and then suddenly you can’t. Why has the audio been cut and edited?
6. To hide a cut, a video editor can use a shot from a different camera (for example a medium close-up shot of the interviewer). How many more cuts were made?
7. For what general purpose has the interview been edited?
8. Why did they announce and label the video as “FULL INTERVIEW” while there is clear evidence of cutting and editing?
*Morph cut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6wPUtKg-Ac
>>8294899 (OP)
dubs confirm. RIP ASSANGE
if he were still alive Trump would have likely set him free by now
Isnt this that weird tech that they showcased a few months ago where they imitated Trump?
Some guy talked and the Software would give out a video of Trump talking?
Just putting it out there. This narrative started as soon as Soros and friends started to "regroup" following the humiliating loss of Hillary. The shills never present facts or evidence to back their claims, and use leftist shaming tactics when called out. This same narrative is being spammed on many boards across the internet, with shills astroturfing and trying to act like the info is legit. Post style of the shills makes it very obvious that they are outsiders.
This narrative is even getting spammed by day old accounts on a small forum that I frequent. At first it seemed like the Assange threads were done by butthurt leftists but it's becoming clear that this is far more malicious. Potentially another Todd&Claire. Be wary.
>>8294899 (OP)
And I also want to point out that the OP show a blatant, intentional lack of understanding of image processing and compression. They simply make claims and attack dissenters to silence dissent.
File (): 8aa28b464c094c3⋯.png (112.14 KB, 344x339, 344:339, 8aa28b464c094c3ab9f695270a….png)
deeply concerning
its looks like they cut it too close like they were trying to hide it… That takes more rendering than a morph cut
A decent new agency would use a dip to white to show a cut
Pretty much, went over it briefly earlier and from that version it seems unlikely however thats 8months ago.
Regardless I still have no idea whats going on with Wikileaks atm, I only know that one side says hes dead or compromised, the other side says hes fine.
The only thing I know is of their tweets with typos that in the end spelt out "Help him".
Anyone can update or clear up?
just going to put this out there
>>8294899 (OP)
Morphnet can be used to create realistic sounding voices. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIvvHwFSZHs
You pair that up with this and with the right supercomputer you could fake anyone.
Lots of speculation of it being a ctr nerdvirgin narrative but wilileaks Twitter has done literally nothing to confirm proof of life and the excuses so far have been nigger-tier retarded.
So I will do a preemptive ==F==
>implying he can't throw his weight around as President Elect
>Morphnet can be used to create realistic sounding voices.
Is this true?
The first morph happened when he claimed that Trump represented white-trash. Second morph happened right as he was vaguely mentioning his internet being cut.
I'm not that technical when it comes to video compression.
How likely is it that this happens twice in a 20 minute clip?
In the original interview there is another artifact (at 00:15:08:22) in the bottom left corner. It seems the morph/blend algorithm was struggling with the disappearing hand. A compression artifact seems unlikely since it appears out of nothing. It just doesn't seem to be a "smear" from a previous frame.
That does not look like a cut, I've sent three requests now, to Dartmouth Films, John Pilger & RT.
This film is entirely CGI.. including john pilger.
They deliberately left in the flaw at the "deplorable" code word JUST TO FUCK WITH US and to show us they control everything.
File (): ef7223ed75499ee⋯.png (717.37 KB, 1800x1200, 3:2, c4ce28386a8474e806c2078c21….png)
>>8294899 (OP)
So is this a bot trying to convince people that Assange is dead/captured so that is demoralizes people?
Yeah, seems that this is the case
dont all the "glitches" or whatever you want to call it happen at the same time?
Hilloli clinton and her allies figured out how to
combine neural networks for audio and auto-morphing for video to create a fully CGI fully realistic video of assange.
It's a filter you can use in Premiere Pro that "smoothly" blends cuts between video clips when the source image is something fairly simple like a person. It's not perfect though, it makes mistakes. They shouldn't have bothered with it.
File (): 8a600ace35c31d5⋯.png (1.31 MB, 1260x1412, 315:353, Screen Shot 2016-11-19 at ….png)
File (): 8e83db25b13e8a0⋯.png (219.11 KB, 415x422, 415:422, loli_nazi.png)
File (): 584dc4c13b2d1be⋯.png (1.14 MB, 1440x900, 8:5, aasangefinger.png)
>>8294899 (OP)
An anon posted this in another thread. he marked the cuticles with blue dots
the finger where it's pointing at "dissapeared", like you see the beard in the place where the top part of the finger is supposed to be.
Is it also an editing mistake or more proof of a rendericed face?
i cant believe you fucking idiots are still pushing this nonsense.
HE GAVE A FUCKING RAPE TRIAL TESTIMONY FEW DAYS AGO.
just throwing this out there that this and other threads, previous comments, etc showcase there certainly is a concentrated effort to lead this discussion and that lies in those claiming out of near-religious hopefulness that everything is okay.
These shills are also more "aware" of board culture than most other shills are. They (mostly) can talk the talk. But no self respecting anon is looking at anything that's occurred with wikileaks in the past month, with their fucking director being murdered no less and a fucking near continent wide DDoS to prevent the deadman switch.
Julian is dead, or captured. And there's a specific effort to lead us away from believing this.
File (): 2f9f2204cfe0c47⋯.jpg (35.25 KB, 628x599, 628:599, 1423392873876.jpg)
>still no pics
>still no videos
>larpers saying he's compromised
it's all speculation but it is very plausible that it is actually true
> And there's a specific effort to lead us away from believing this.
exactly. but they can't hide it forever and eventually more people will start asking questions.
the real question is what do we do now?
What does one need to be able to visit Assange? Some sort of media credentials?
He has celebrities visiting him, what would it take for an average Joe to arrange an interview with him?
If I lived in London, I know what I'd do. I may be in London next month, but we'll see by then. I just can't understand why it's so hard to just waltz into the embassy. Pamela Anderson did it. I'd just get a tan and pretend to be a shitskin.
This. When has wikileaks ever made references, let alone directly naming 8ch.
It screams of "L-look guys, you can still trust us"
I meant.. after he is confirmed dead or captured (and we can assume he is) - what do we do?
68 74 74 70 73 3a 2f 2f 67 61 74 65 77 61 79 2e 69 70 66 73 2e 69 6f 2f 69 70 66 73 2f 51 6d 57 6f 44 65 64 54 43 35 72 6d 78 70 55 73 67 61 70 37 47 43 66 58 63 72 71 5a 66 61 48 56 39 5a 42 54 65 67 52 53 4d 4c 4e 72 61 47 2f 54 68 65 25 32 30 47 72 65 61 74 25 32 30 57 69 7a 61 72 64 25 32 30 4f 66 25 32 30 4c 65 61 6b 73 2e 6d 64
One of his lawyers talking about >>8296265
Shill.
WikiL and Bitcoin have an interesting past. Bitcoin owes JA a favor. One could assume a very safe place to hide data would be in a blockchain
File (): 3410b2a5140d9cf⋯.jpg (99.8 KB, 501x585, 167:195, 1432688374000.jpg)
kek still no pictures or videos. i smell bullshit
you really expect to be taken seriously posting with the name Blockchain Secrets?
decoded:
https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/QmWoDedTC5rmxpUsgap7GCfXcrqZfaHV9ZBTegRSMLNraG/The%20Great%20Wizard%20Of%20Leaks.md
travel here at your own risk anons
Something is wrong 100%. I just realised this but maybe DAK (Day Assange Kidnapped/Killed) was a psy-op as a warning from the FBI ? They kept mentioning 16.10.16. That was the day when Kerry pressures Ecuador and the armed men appeared at the embassy, thoughts?
At least at two different times according to OP's video.
As far as I can tell if that was a compression error and not an advanced edit, you wouldn't see glitches only in those particular places, specially in the second one where he moves his head all around but only the edge of the shirt glitches.
There is one easy way to verify if he's dead or alive: Somebody Leak Something
It doesn't have to be anything spectacular, just something you have access to that is vaguely in the public interest.
Encrypt whatever you send with the public gpg key; if they can't post a signed message then they can't decrypt what you send.
If they publish all is well, otherwise post what you send here as definitive proof….
Somthing is up but if he really has been taken i there is a hell of alot of people involved Wikileaks wasn't just a 3 man team it was growing at an incredible rate
go have a look at the members known to be actively involved in Wikileaks to see if there attitudes have changed
File (): 9b687754144481e⋯.jpg (34.73 KB, 477x299, 477:299, Crypto nerd comic.jpg)
Assuming he didn't had his passphrase in a post-it or they didn't cut his fingers one by one until he told them.
>Hurr there's no point trying to protect your information durr you'll just be captured and tortured for it anyway
Christ XKCD is such a basic piece of shit. Faggot even did a piece encouraging people to vote for fucking Hillary. He will receive a public hanging on the day of the rope.
So they have access to the pgp key and it's password; went to the effort of coercing the Russians into editing a video but won't use the key to sign a message?
Is it true that John Pilger refuses to comment on the interview and it's inconsistencies?
At 1:49 his chest swells but doesn't go back to normal. Look at the width of the white shirt, it gets wider.
And why is no one mentioning that Pam Anderson visited him again with more food? 2 days ago. www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3932036/Pamela-Anderson-cuts-sophisticated-figure-brings-snacks-WikiLeaks-founder-Julian-Assange-joked-vegan-treats-torture.html
File (): 25db48839b231f6⋯.png (2.01 MB, 2095x1028, 2095:1028, randall munroe.png)
Pam wrote about the most recent visit 2 fucking days ago in her blog www.pamelaandersonfoundation.org/news/ Nimbus won't get a full page for some reason
Update: at 2:29 is another one (most likely). His collar in the back of his neck and also the left side (for us the right side) of his jacket, changes shape.
Vote for him in TIME Person of the year. He'll have to show himself on award night in some form, else we know he's dead.
Posting this in relevant threads, not shilling, just making sure anons read it.
I, the OP, am a noob. Is there a way I can edit/update the thread? Looked through FAQ but can't find the answer…
Just post it here so people who instantly scroll to the bottom read it.
File (): 34414ede5f01531⋯.jpg (29.83 KB, 595x303, 595:303, Block_partition.jpg)
>As far as I can tell if that was a compression error
MPEG-4 video compression doesn't work like that. When there's not enough bits, you see a lot of macroblocks. When there's missing frames, the whole picture goes to shit like one of those "artistically-broken" GIFs.
keep digging and doing the things people have already discussed doing. not to say 8chans compromised, but we all know we're being watched here now.
So because of that, actual content can't really be discussed until revealed. Where to do that I won't say (we all know where we can go to do that, we all have our own places).
Following leads IRL is just the next best bet, but people need to take caution in doing so. That or deliberately bait those watching us by springing a trap on them with numbers and weapons.
Outside of finding more connections or more whistleblowers coming out, if anyone even a fucking patsy was taken hold of we'd probably be able to dig more info out of them.
I think the only thing these people don't comprehend is some of us are as deranged as them and are more than willing to cross boundaries we never would otherwise with them. Many of us are desensitized as well.
I don't even know where to start with the information here.
A perfect front for publishing genuine information which is being sought to be censored is to publish a supposed fiction.
No the first morph made it sound like he called Trump deplorable.
The second likely completely removed a sentence or cut minutes.
>>8294899 (OP)
>>8294899 (OP)
>>8294899 (OP)
>>8294899 (OP)
HOLY SHIT
LOOK AT THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THE VIDEO
RIGHT BEFORE THE OBVIOUS EDITS, A GHOST HAND APPEARS.
NOT A DRILL
NOT A DRILL
Assange is kill, wat now?
How will this play out now that Trump's president elect?
File (): a742cfbcab617ea⋯.jpg (487.09 KB, 1653x1103, 1653:1103, Israel superpower.jpg)
File ():42baac3949f38d8⋯.png (7.55 MB, 2560x4121, 2560:4121, Trump P R S.png)
File (): ecd682ae84bedc7⋯.jpg (1.92 MB, 3048x3456, 127:144, trumpgoy.jpg)
Thanks for correcting the record.
I see. the video is fake, but Assange is safe, just their ability to connect to outside world is cut.
He's either in a blacksite and the LARPer is correct, and the tru leaks will come out in the next few days.
Also possible he is drumming it up on purpose, but unlikely.
Another chance he's dead.
As long as the leaks come out, we win.
>LARPer
Everyone pay attention.
This is a shill meme.
LARPing = taking action.
It's there to make you not take action and stay online.
Fuck off tard.
There'd be no point trying to blackpill on Trump if they had got what they wanted.
You can still see the top of his middle finger, but it's blurry. Probably because of the movement.
Maybe i just want to believe he's alive and well.
there's also a ghost hand in the bottom left corner just before the edits.
File (): 4e09c9406f92f4c⋯.jpg (26.12 KB, 450x375, 6:5, hide yo wifi.jpg)
File (): 7b223e899eef68e⋯.jpg (655.87 KB, 493x740, 493:740, 7b223e899eef68e96ee266e2b3….jpg)
>LARPing = taking action
>>8294899 (OP)
Was this video/interview done in conjunction with RT?
It seems weird to me that they would play along with this deception, when they have been gleefully publishing articles about the recent leaks and have been accused of being involved themselves.
Assange being dead would be a huge scoop for RT also.
Someone said in another thread the place is surrounded by cops who'll turn people away and confiscate their phones. If you do decide to check it out, don't have anything with you that's important.
Assange is an opportunist piece of scum. If you ever went to a David Irving lecture in past 10 years, your name is on a "list" provided by them and given to the SPLC. Because you have in interest in WW 2 and why, exactly, it's illegal in Europe to even question the official version.
Now personally, I don't care. Are the Jews going to dox me? They'll find a few misdemeanor arrests, no home phone, no goybook, and residing under someone else's residency and NEET.
On the principle, I'd like to kill him myself if if I could ever could the chance. "You aren't allowed to go to lectures about historical events that aren't kosher approved, goy." fuck Assange.
>Was this video/interview done in conjunction with RT?
No, they just gave it to RT and RT published it. They also gave it to other mainstream media but they didn't release it. I remember reading this somewhere.
>"You aren't allowed to go to lectures about historical events that aren't kosher approved, goy"
What?
Why do you think politicians go into government?
To take action
In that case - Trump and Assange are LARPers.
fuck you and him. That's his choice to handle what he knows is classified information. I may not give a fuck, buy men with families, regular people, are now on an "SPLC list" also hosted by his site for going to a lecture by a history writer?
And you are justifying it? Back to reddit asshole.
Okey, I thought this was disinfo until now. These are some very valid questions and points being raised, plus >>8295792 this too. Something is DEFINITELY fishy with this interview.
File (): 0bb940b06a8288f⋯.png (666.44 KB, 1884x2428, 471:607, ea7525d6064ec5500ea12abb27….png)
can confirm shills don't yet know what larping is. nice catch anon. That time again, more often these days.
What's a LARPer then?
If you distract and don't give me the definition - YOU'RE the shill.
I think there may be some editing involved, plus I bet the footage is pre-recorded.
Assange - just release a photo.
Just one fucking photo.
David Irving, look him up. He was a respected writer on WW 2, his first book was on Dresden. When he did his research for his bio on Hitler, he couldn't find any concrete info on the Holyco$t, so refused to but anything about "gas ovens" in his book.
He went from a millionaire to his publisher dropping him, being sued, time in jail, banned from just about every country on earth. His crime? He has questions about the "gas ovens" and the number "6 million."
and if you ever went to see him (this was before bitcoin)? Now you are on an SPLC "hate list" obtained and hosted by wikileaks. Assange knew he was breaking a law, he has a long history of computer vandalism.
Ruining people's lives for having an interest in WW 2? that's when I get murderous and I feel fully justified in it.
Talk about shills and LARPers, look in the mirror. Do you actually understand what we are talking about here? My life was over long before anyway, I was already fucked.
Over 1,000 people all over the US– doctors, lawyers, housewives, people with families now cannot get jobs bc Assange decided he had a right to play judge, jury, and SPLC plays executioner. For what crime? Going to hear an historian speak.
That's soviet, Judeo-Bolshevik level. If he wants to get involved in handling ZOG classified info, buy the ticket, take the ride, he knew what ZOG was. He made a conscious, informed decision to ruin lives of normal people whose crime was having an interest in history that the Jews and SJW found unacceptable.
I'd literally pull trigger myself, although that's too quick a death for him. I hope ZOG gets him and sends him to Gitmo and tortures him. He likes to judge and set others up for ruination. Why shouldn't he get the same in return?
Snowden is a totally different story. He took the info, he took the risk, he didn't set up a site just to fuck over anyone who happened to fall into the SJW's crosshairs until he himself ended up in ZOG's scope with no way out.
Assange is complete fucking trash. Snowden didn't ruin any normal person, he went after ZOG, which wether I agree or not, the only ones involved were him and ZOG. Assange is the scum of the earth.
Not once during the entire interview does assange mention an event that happened after the day where the embassy was supposedly raided. I sincerely believe him to be dead.
This right here. Make a fake leak and see if wikileaks can bite, if they can't, confirmed assange B&n'd from real life.
I refer you to misdirector / discreditor
You are falling for the bait and forgetting the thread is about JULIAN ASSANGE
Notice the shills post count, low content and formatting, he is trying to sage this thread to page 15 ( and lower )
+
Wikileaks has operated successfully for ten years. Only the darknet and the watchers will truly know what happened. May the watch over us in guise.
7/11
If you have access to jewggle, it shouldn't be hard. If you don't already know it, this must be your first time here or you are taking the piss. The very thing I'm talking about validates the acronym: Zionist Occupied Government.
"You're on the wrong side if history, goy." Irving, as far as I know, still has lectures on Jewtube unless ZOG has taken those down too. These weren't meetings of…I was one of youngest people there, they were mostly iddli-aged people with an interest in history, some of Germanic-descent with an interest in their history. Look at the people featured in these lectures and tell me if there could be any justification for…and even if ZOG wanted to infiltrate and do surveillance, I'm sure they were, they were literally HISTORY LECTURES just like in any University, but they were not kosher-approved. And this is in the United States, with the right to free speech and freedom of assembly.
He does mention Hilldog's "17 intelligence agencies" claim which was made on the 19th which is a few days after. I can't seem to find it stated anywhere earlier than that.
Stop watching fucking Alex jones asshole. you are the LARPer and shill. I can go to the SPLC site or wikileaks and find my own name and former address, stolen from Irving and/or facilitated by Assange. That's a form of terrorism. ANTIFA types would play games where they'd try to find location so they could rush in and scream and throw human shit and at the NYC one pepper spray.
I have an arrest because of that incident. You are sitting on a fucking computer, have never done a thing in your fucking life but listen to alex Jewnes and call others "shills." Ironically, the people who have actually paid a price for what Assange did.
Obviously, hope you're wrong. But Clinton wouldn't surprise me. Not to mention the rhetoric behind that when "I've done bad things" but not when "hey, look. China did bad things." Either way, he won't be directly on the net, but his followers live on and the purpose has been served well. F
In Germany, Irving spoke at a meeting, he did not mention the holocaust, and the host of the meeting got the standard 7 year sentence because Irving "was the type of person would who say that sort of thing".
1. Why are you a dumbass?
2. Why are you sperging about an edited video?
3. Why does it surprise you that the video was edited?
4. Why do you think it's a huge conspiracy worth burning calories over?
5. If he farted and they cut it out, is that evidence of a conspiracy worth getting paranoid about?
6. Do Assange's farts smell and does Russia know?
7. Could we please stop with the dumbass threads that come to dumbass conclusions based on paranoia rather than evidence?
Motherfucker, what do you think happens when you go for a job interview and have an arrest for assault for getting into a brawl with ANTIFa scum? 2nd degree assault? Plus the 10 days on Rikers, plus the $13 k for a lawyer.
That was all due due to Assange, playing games with ANTIFA and hacking Irving and telling where the lecture was. Which is absurd that it had to be hidden anyway. I've had my ass burned for Assange's treachery and narcissism. you sit here parroting Alex jones and pretending life is a spy game.
It's real. Rikers is real. The 3 mexicans who got into a fight in with shanks in the prison library and 2 of them died and blood squirting everywhere was REAL, I saw it.
Life is not a fucking video game, as you seem to think.
when you get jumped outside a church in brooklyn by nadia with pepper spray, you should just roll over and take it, like you would you miserable faggot.
The consequences of Assange's bullshit are REAL, That's what you can't get through you're obese, Alex Jones filled head.
> nadia
*ANTIFA, although I actually like "nadia" better to deserve them. They act really tough with their masks, but they sure can't take a few punches and when the cops come and they have 2 jew layers with them, who do you think gets locked up?
not them.
>Assault who you think is antifa
>Arrested
>You probably picked the fight and started it
>This is Assange's fault
dumbass
>stop listening to alex jones, asshole
Wow, still looking for the 270, CTR?
>still not know what a LARPer is
good for you, your learning ad hominems, you might even be a yuri beznemov pupil
>"my name and address on wikileaks."
Great, I'll be checking the Irving files, Mr Yorkshireman. Don't forget boil your afternoon tea with your svastika-encrusted crumpets. If you're worried about your name on wikileaks and you say it you are lying to me or you are extremely stupid.
█░░░█▀▀▀▀
█░░░█░░░░
█▄▄▄█▄▄▄▄
░░░░█░░░█
▄▄▄▄█░░░█
no fuckhead, the people pepper spraying me were hare krishnas. Was it Assange's fault? 100%. You are a fat shitbag somewhere in the midwest. After his initial Pr died down and he needed to stay relevant, he worked with ANTIFa, 100%.
Go check his site file map, the Irving list is still there. The fucking mental gymnastics you LARPing motherfuckers will do in order to justify staying around Larping is amazing.
Ah, I see. So it's now a question of the motivations and integrity of the company who produced it, and the Interviewer. From a human factor pov anyway.
File (): 6218cc8152399f1⋯.jpg (3.82 KB, 104x125, 104:125, 1459593802584s.jpg)
edgy, hymie. "Shut em down for call alex jones the obese, con artist, zionist stooge he is."
"I'm gonna check da list on you." Feel free. Feel free to visit, too, I'll be waiting. where the bodies are buried.
File (): 0cbe846fb4924bd⋯.png (67.03 KB, 799x860, 799:860, warhol merchant 3.png)
>ppl being pepper sprayed was asange's fault
>plane crashes are the wright brothers' fault
>ww2 was hitler's fault
>all distrust in jews is hitler's fault
Filtered, JIDF.
File (): eecfee14c29788c⋯.jpg (14.4 KB, 300x295, 60:59, scooby-jew.jpg)
You can't even decide what you are trying to LARP as. And here's another tip– Bezmenov is a fraud, at least with regard to access he had. At that time, the CIA was paying huge shekels for KGN walk-ins. No way in fuck, if he were as high up as he says, he ever would have had to work as a janitor in the ZOG as he claims.
Start driving in from the desert, would be happy to meet.
File (): 6ae1a68c367c249⋯.png (88.52 KB, 640x640, 1:1, ehheehe.png)
lol, you fucking bunch of fraud assholes. When Assange is involved in stealing the info from Irving, and spreading it from his site, knowing full well ANTIFA was trying to shit down an HISTORIAN giving a lecture? 100%.
What the fuck has happened to the mods? There are barely-diguised leftists here, defending fucking ANTIFA and preventing people from listening to David Irving.
THIS is fucking /pol/ now? No idea what has happened to this site since election, but not the one I remember.
That doesn't spell "help him" recipe had an added I in the second tweet and is not missing an e.
Anon, he wouldn't have a list to put up if the SPLC hadn't made it in the first place though. It is incredibly irresponsible to just publish these things when normal, regular people are the subjects of the documents though.
His publishing it for the world to see is both positive and negative:
On the one hand, people will now know they are on such a list and can take action against those that put them on there. The world can see what kind of people the SPLC really are, and those who feed the info to them.
On the other hand, having the list on wikileaks means that others who share SPLC's views will now have something to act on should they wish.
So if you're on a blacklist or hitlist owned by an organisation like SPLC, would you want to know or would you rather remain blissfully unaware?
Yeah it's not cool to spread info about people going to his lectures. Still, you cant deny the overwhelming positive side of wikileaks.
File (): ef72e3b8d1b17e8⋯.png (498.25 KB, 800x800, 1:1, 6ba77c84bea77f3343f8f5972f….png)
>Second image
>Alt-right
>Breitbart, Milo, and The Rebel
Nobody believes this save for Hillshills.
you are LARPers and fucking frauds, who have never paid any sort of price for freedom of expression, sitting around pretending you are fighting anything by going through twaater.
Not one of you seems to have any idea the battles that went on to try to maintain free speech in this country, and that people actually paid a price for it.
good work Mods. this is now a Leftist/LARPer hellhole site who defends the right of ANTIFA to break up lectures by David Irving.Even his lectures are disappearing from Jewtube. amazing.
>My life was over long before anyway, I was already fucked.
You weak piece of shit.
And you complain about LARPers?
You're so arrogant you think doing nothing is more responsible.
Kids are dying anon. And people like you are the reason.
> Snowden is a totally different story. He took the info, he took the risk
And got a nice comfy hollywood movie for himself. :^)
You really think he was a real hacker? He either flies low, or he's a plant.
> Assange is complete fucking trash.
I smell a butthurt shillery or bernout supporter. The fact you say that means your a fucking shill.
Assange has done nothing but sacrifice his life for the sake of humanity.
He diverted us from imminent World War with russia.
KYS.
thank you
protip: will be saging slide threads soon, notice the low effort clickbait
>doing nothing is more responsible.
anon, when you get locked up for "assaulting" 3 ANTIFA thugs who are pepper spraying you in the eye and so you rough up a few of them (this was when Assange had just put the meeting place up, not even individual names) what do you really have left to do?
the oldfags here(not the new reddit scum) can look and see how closely involved Assange was with ANTIFA and other leftists. Until HIS OWN ass was on the line against ZOG, then he did a 180 and quick.
and now you have all these newfag reddit scum calling him a "hero," not realizing he's an opportunist who shared none of the traditional /pol/ beliefs until ZOG screwed him personally. THEN suddenly he understood.
For the oldfags who don't know, look into his collaboration with Leftist orgs and ANTIFA before he himself got ZOGGED. See how closely he worked with them. My source? A friend of mine, Israel Shamir, a convert Jew who became Russian Orthodox, lives in Russia, and ran "wikileaks Russia" before he realized he was scum. I've no more to say. I'll leave one more Irving video for the old fags who might care, because his books are now almost all out of print and the Jews are going to try their hardest to get rid of them as soon as he is officially dead and his daughters have rights to them.
Irving's best stuff is from right after he won the lawsuit and got a few hundred k and was on a roll. He's almost senile and broke now, financially and physically.
Just letting you all know that you can still get most of Irving's books here: https://irvingbooks.com/xcart/home.php?cat=3
Thanks, well aware of the idea of a ZOG just didn't know the exact acronym. I didn't want to jewgle it because it is jewgle and I am careful about what I do and how despite the false anonymity.
>when you get locked up for "assaulting" 3 ANTIFA thugs who are pepper spraying you in the eye and so you rough up a few of them (this was when Assange had just put the meeting place up, not even individual names) what do you really have left to do?
Not be a pussy. Risk life and limb.
>anon, when you get locked up for "assaulting" 3 ANTIFA thugs who are pepper spraying you in the eye and so you rough up a few of them (this was when Assange had just put the meeting place up, not even individual names) what do you really have left to do?
Body cam.
Funs.
FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT THIS TECHNOLOGY EXISTS
Seriously guys, be on your fucking guard from here on out.
File (): 2050210b6b7c015⋯.gif (424.79 KB, 512x512, 1:1, 1442846338686.gif)
File (): a393276d2c5a5c5⋯.gif (2.54 MB, 658x800, 329:400, 1442847758460.gif)
File (): 711dea8da8fa215⋯.jpg (46.57 KB, 275x326, 275:326, 1477269212578.jpg)
I was a liberal who had my career destroyed because I wrote articles talking about why feminism and insane Orwellian leftism was destroying my industry. Even though I was a liberal (I thought) I understood these things were destroying my industry but I didn't know them by name or understood how they worked. The main point of my argument was freedom of speech. For that they discredited me and lied about me in the MSM which shattered my career.
It took me years to recover and restart a life. Since then, I've been on a personal war against this left subversion and the left's war against our freedoms. This led me to these dark corners.
Don't give me this fucking speech you worthless faggot.
>brings up milo
>doesn't bring up all the kikes Trump is surrounding himself with or Ivanka being a kike convert
>or Ivanka being a kike convert
Why do so many /pol/acks care about what Ivanka is? She's just a woman.
This guy smells like shill, he thinks getting beat up by antifa makes him a revolutionary, while still making it out to be all Assange's fault. He tries to appeal to board culture, while trying to make us turn on someone we have always supported. Fuck this low energy shill
>anon, when you get locked up for "assaulting" 3 ANTIFA thugs who are pepper spraying you in the eye and so you rough up a few of them
Whatever anyone thinks, this alone is a nice mental image, the antifa scum getting a beating. Sorry you had to go through all that though, anon.
So it wasn't the case that someone had leaked this SPLC list to wikileaks and then wikileaks published it? (the order of events wasn't clear from your posts initially)
polite sage for OT
File (): 353dbc557a3dbc9⋯.jpg (128.49 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 1466006689857.jpg)
>>8294899 (OP)
Dis some spooky shit man.
The interview was sponsored by the Russian Government why would they be interested in helping the Clintons?
File (): f74dd722e804545⋯.gif (464.95 KB, 200x317, 200:317, dubs.gif)
Checked
Also, "him" is a stretch on the last one considering how previous characters were "chosen".
>>8294899 (OP)
9. Why did Julian Assange disappear shortly after Pamela Anderson's visit at the embassy to give him some harmless gift food?
10. Why does /pol/ seem strangely incurious to investigate the above when there are so many factors indicating there is something to it?
There's improvements not just in replacing facial expressions in real time but also in how detailed they can be mapped.
I just now used google and read quite a bit about the Irving/Wikileaks incident. Irvings hack is still there https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Controversial_holocaust_historian_David_Irving_emails,_Nov_2009 looks like Assange fell for the usual leftist narrative and jumped onto Irving, which isn't surprising since Assange has been a left icon for ten years. Irving is very /pol/, funny how he's being sneered at in here.
Also extremely amusing that porno whore Pam Anderson can get in to see Assange any time but his own lawyer can't? Makes no sense and shes lying. He's dead or in Gitmo, anyone with half a brain can see that.
How sad that it was the left that spearheaded his death, all for pedo Hillary and her friends. You all should be asking Pam about this more than anyone else at this time. Spread rumors about her and get her to respond, it'll be easy to catch her out in a mistake.
> from here on out.
Not that we can go back in time and be on guard, but it's been going on for awhile. This tech is not new
Some characters that we believe to be real, that we've only seen on screens, may not have ever been real.
And try to tell a normie that our perception of reality might be this disconnected from true reality, good luck!
Thanks for this, anon.
I suppose he is not above courting the left at a time when it was profitable or safer to do so than not. Many have done and still do.
So either in flipping he's "seen the light" or now courting the right because of the change in tide. Bit of a risky play, going after the Clintons though.
The intense and fierce opposition to people looking into the history surrounding the holocaust aside from that in the textbooks, is disturbing.
File (): c9656e02dbe1295⋯.jpg (203.03 KB, 635x400, 127:80, file_182745_1_Golovkin_vs_….jpg)
I'm pretty sure Trump said he wanted to kill Assange.
And by pretty sure, I mean I'm 100% sure he said he wanted to do that.
Unless something changed his mind within the past few months, which I'd like to see evidence of.
he said he wanted to kill the nsa fag not assange you shill idiot
No it wasn't. It was published by RT, but someone gave it to them, all they did was Publish it.
Fuck you're right I'm retarded. It was Snowden.
What's the difference though? They've both done the same shit, haven't they?
Not at all. Snowden was a full on worker at the nsa and stole a bunch of shit. Then he left, released a few things, sent some things to the Guardian (which hasn't really released much at all), then never released anything since he made it to Russia
Assange has a decade worth of releasing information people have sent to him (after he verifies it), and was not fleeing his job, he didn't steal anything, etc
File (): c6e4f18088e75a1⋯.jpg (65.95 KB, 1024x576, 16:9, 7ZzgIeW.jpg)
He wasn't an employee of the NSA. He was an employee of an NSA contractor.
The point he was making is there are too many people who aren't terribly loyal to the US, in subcontractor positions, who have access to incredibly sensitive state secrets.
He went public and made a big stink. But there are over a million people with secret clearances out there. With little oversight. Who knows whom they're selling intel too.
What is the source of that photo? I was just watching some footage on youtube from the space station and you could clearly see a large circular object moving into low orbit above a large storm cloud. It just sat there and and quietly disappeared into shadow as Earth spun into night time on that side of the world.
Go to 10:30 and you will see it. Looking at the picture that was posted you will notice 4 glowing orbs inside the object. This is interesting as most "UFO" sightings are of strange lights in the sky which appear to be orbs or circles.
File (): 8a7c8f2217a9473⋯.gif (57.75 KB, 467x200, 467:200, Admiral Ackbar.gif)
(((wikileaks))) still host the leaked British National Party members list. They are leftist, globalist stooges. Don't even think about leaking anything with them. (((Julian Assange))) is an actor. If he was for the real, the (((MSM))) would never talk about him.
>the finger where it's pointing at "dissapeared",
No it didn't thats motion blur and encoding
>>8294899 (OP)
Are there people here not aware of the whole wikileaks drama a few weeks before this video was aired?
There was more weird stuff going on than I can count.
A lot of us actually predicted the possibility of a shooped video. Thanks for finding it.
>>8294899 (OP)
You don't ever see them together in a shot. That usually means something fishy is going on.
File ():9e7d0c75e53b774⋯.jpg(763.15 KB, 766x1776, 383:888,N3bBSHd.jpg)
File (): 9fbec1c5cbc2ca1⋯.png (132.58 KB, 840x960, 7:8, 1478043008009.png)
How do we know this faggot and FBI Anon weren't just larping?
If I'm remembering correctly it's just the reflection of a guys ceiling light shade on his window.
It was posted on reddit ages ago.
>This narrative is even getting spammed by day old accounts on a small forum that I frequent.
This. Soros is nervous.
t. Tides Foundation mole
In light of all the new technology we've found out about, I wouldn't be surprised if this was the technology employed. If you look hard enough, the same shit happens to George's face in this video. Freaky stuff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk
linking cause can't post it.
We also have to make the assumption that the technology these people are using is years ahead of what we're seeing right now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3l4XLZ59iw
File (): 7dd5e6f297a57e9⋯.jpg (117.39 KB, 688x379, 688:379, as_bpap.jpg)
>CIA interrogated me but they just let me go and gave me a laptop to shitpost on the chans instead of shooting or sending me to Cuba
The first one is total bullshit and will look like that to anyone who is not in confirmation bias about Wikileaks being compromised, try reading it again with that framing.
Makes you wonder why Wikileaks namedropped us and that particular post in their 4million followers account. >>8296027
Make us look bad?
>look goys only conspiracy nuts think we are compromised!
Look at the shadows around his mouth. Something's fucky with the lighting.
File (): 04543702c206fcf⋯.png (370.84 KB, 991x740, 991:740, ClipboardImage.png)
Really? This shit is so obvious that it was even on a (((Reuters))) podcast this week. If Uranium One wasn't enough to convince you, the Russians wanted Clinton to win. They saw her as ultimately corrupt and therefore predictable and easy to control. The whole Russia for Trump meme was planted by the Clintons to cover up this blatantly obvious fact, and the fact that Trump is a man's man (and respects that in Putin) gave the media the cover to go for it.
>Sage for off topic
As a law fag who's studied the abomination that is the current year legal system, I can tell you that these are in fact a real thing.
tptb did a real number on the Constitution in the wake of 9/11.
Can you shed some light on what it is then? It sounds like made up LARP term.
It's on wikipedia, nothing secret about it, and the second paragraph mentions gag orders already, guess where did he get the idea.
I'm not murrican but article also states FBI issues those and the tripfag claims it was CIA (and they even showed him the papers, how kind!).
I also wouldn't send a letter to a hacker telling him to not be a bad goy and delete all the evidence we are supposed to gather.
https://www.eff .org/issues/national-security-letters
>Being this much of a faggot that you can't use jewgle (searx.me).
It's the rough equivalent of an NDA, attached to a subpeona. They are a consequence of the Patriot Act and FISA which allows a judge to suspend a person's freedom of speech if the FISA court finds valid cause for a subpoena. Since FISA precedent is secret, no one really knows what qualifies you to get one of these letters.
The existence of these letters is a major part of why many websites now have warrant canaries. The fact you don't know about it makes me suspect you just came over from halfchan. Their warrant canary went off some time ago.
Again, faggot, the precedent used to qualify someone for a letter is secret. You are also not allowed to talk about receiving one. We only know about the FBI using them because the EFF got involved when the FBI was using them to spam ISPs and TSPs and got FOIA information and a CA court ruling. FBI handles domestic investigations, CIA handles international ones. Wikileaks is not a US-based organization. So yeah, it's reasonable to assume the CIA would be the ones passing out letters in this case.
That one is really obvious, you don't even need to slow it down. But to be honest it looks like a normal cut to me.
I am not saying that everything is normal you faggot, that one at 15:07 is shady as hell. I am just saying that the one at 1:49 looks like a normal cut.
Nothing is normal in a full interview of a man that is supposed to be missing.
File (): a95706fa4a9685d⋯.jpg (97.28 KB, 1124x632, 281:158, CwoKMKdVQAA-gsG.jpg)
Seeing this same post posted over and over doesn't make me any less concerned. The twitter-account has been acting strange since internet-cut
I know how image processing and compression works. It does not look like mpeg4-artifacts (or any mpeg for that matter). What you would expect is parts of an I-frame staying in place if a following B-frame was corrupt.
I honestly don't know who's shilling who anymore. The example from Assange is not a simple I/P/B-frame issue. You can't "skip" to a new image using motion vectors. Not comparable to the stupid reptilian-eyes, which are mostly very clear codec-artifacts. The "skip" in OP looks like I-frame to I-frame, or what you would expect from a cut…
Wouldn't such a bad cut make sure that the people would start questioning if the footage is real or not ? Especially if we believe he is dead.
How isn't this common sense?
Yeah I did just come from halfchan, mostly for the pizzagate threads which seem to be more substantive here. I am probably going to stay as I like this board more overall. I will try not to shit it up.
File (): bf8bb25d6f536d0⋯.gif (161.07 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 1380912096193.gif)
File (): cc425772da0775a⋯.png (98.16 KB, 969x869, 969:869, RFR_3.png)
>Again, faggot
Do you really not realize how retarded it is to send a letter to fucking wikileaks asking for cooperation and to stay shut?
And that's not even the biggest nonsense in that story, do you really believe if CIA had his hands on a wikileaks operative that has been leaking confidencial docs for years, he'd be free to shitpost on the chans a day later?
That post has been TAILORED to feed confirmation bias of the people here, by someone who really knows the board culture and current topics, a lot of effort was put into that. Who would put that much effort into disrupting/discrediting our board?
If they weren't compromised, and that was actually censored, I'd assume they'd have said so on twitter (Hey 4M guys! RT is censoring us!).
If they weren't compromised, and that was just some noise cut ambulance or whatever, it makes sense that they haven't said anything.
If they are compromised, and the video is censored, then you have to assume the Russians are in, because you wouldn't censor a wikileaks interview if you don't know they are compromised.
If they are compromised, and the video is not censored, and this catches on fires, it will be interesting to see how they respond, but they could just use option 2 (just some noise edited out).
File (): 6e5d72771956626⋯.png (42.77 KB, 627x347, 627:347, 5d2ae69f8cc9e3516201ea9f48….png)
Common sense, maybe. No proof either way though. What is more worrying than OPs post (which has legit concerns, especially if you consider all the weird info) is that this topic is derailed and disinfo'ed to hell everywhere it's discussed.
The weird artifacts are not typical of any mpeg-related codec…
The hand in the bottom left corner is proof enough that this is some fuckery for anyone who knows how compression works, and the ONLY artifacts in the video are weird ones, not the type you would expect from a fucked bitstream or missing I-frames, while the audio is without glitches…
File (): 534e76d4f1bdbd3⋯.png (923.07 KB, 1115x754, 1115:754, VP9_macroblocks_ToS_f00808.png)
>The hand in the bottom left corner is proof enough that this is some fuckery for anyone who knows how compression works
To add to that, the same exact fuckery is present on every youtube encoding be it vp9 or mpeg4, if I remember correctly how vp9 transcoding works if that was an error in the original stream, it wouldn't show the same as the mpeg4 ones, correct me if I am wrong.
>CIA
>Asking nicely
Stopped reading your post there.
He never said they were doing that. Given what a national security letter entails, he was probably being informed that he was under total electronic surveillance as part of the information subpoena. The whole point of such a letter is that compliance isn't optional.
It's basically a gigantic fuck you to the recipient if it's a person and an extortion order if it's a company.
Of course you don't have to comply. Obviously if you don't comply, then they can arrest your ass. That's what a subpoena does.
But by giving you the letter they are letting you know that they know where you fucking live and where you go. It's a threat, you dense motherfucker. Clearly the "LARP" anon had no intentions of complying or he wouldn't have said he had gotten one in the first place.
It's quite possible that the lawyers have been thorough enough to keep members of the organization out of the cross hairs of law enforcement. Compartmentalization, careful skirting, the works. What the CIA did with the NSL was dare them to cross the line so they have an excuse to arrest and detain. Which they will do because they just told them that they know where they are.
No need to give one to WL the organization if they are already compromised. Additionally, the legal recourse the US would have against them is probably limited anyway. Again, not a US organization and WL has more competent legal representation than some idiots on the internet.
One thing I don't understand though, if he is dead, then where is his dead man switch? Did his enemies disable it before killing him?
>he was under total electronic surveillance as part of the information subpoena
>they know where you fucking live and where you go
So they know where the cyberterrorist is, they know he is guilty, they have permission of whatever country he is to raid him (since he claims they took his computer and interrogated him) aaand they just send him a fucking letter and let him go, then he escaped because apparently American intelligence can't keep track of some scriptkiddie. Then the rogue hacker decided to tell his story in 8ch of all places, telling us exactly what we want to hear, how convenient.
Between American intelligence being retarded AND incompetent and some anon larping for (you)'s (or a shill spreading disinfo), which one seems more likely to you?
There might be some shady shit going on here, but we are not going to get to the truth of it by believing everything we -want- to believe (because it fits our bias or sounds like fun).
The whole point of a dead man's switch is that it triggers automatically when you die (usually by not inputting a password every X days/hours or similar).
Of course you can always try torturing the guy until he disables it. But you'd think he had that planned and a way to automatically trigger it if he thought he was in real danger.
>this topic is derailed and disinfo'ed to hell everywhere it's discussed
We should try to give visibility to this video thing and try force them to make an statement about it.
Also try to get something from RT to see if the stories match.
Maybe contact the filterwars guys too since they seem to love this kind of stuff and has quite the audience.
Just liking some comments in jewtube isn't gonna cut it.
They know they cant fucking touch Assange so they cook this narrative up to sow confusion and distrust of the organization.
If they could really take out Assange they wouldn't have be signalling that they're going to take him out.
Black-PR campaign posts going around recently trying to suppress submissions to WikiLeaks. False, but who benefits?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.