Bombing Assad not in US interests, but ‘options’ aren’t off the table – White House
6
October, 2016, 23.18 MSKT
The
US says bombing the Assad forces is unlikely to reduce violence, but
nothing can be taken off the table. Previously, a report alleged that
Washington was planning to hit the Syrian Army, prompting a warning
from Russia against any missile or air strikes.
“The
president has discussed in some details why military action against
the Assad regime to try to address the situation in Aleppo is
unlikely to accomplish the goals that many envisioned now in terms of
reducing the violence there,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest
told reporters Thursday.
Even
more so, he said, striking the Syrian government forces might be
counter to America’s national interests.
“It
is much more likely to lead to a bunch of unintended consequences
that are clearly not in our national interest,” he
said.
However,
the White House does not seem to be ruling out the possibility of the
US turning to the military solution entirely.
“I’m
not going to take any options off the table,” he
added. “I
am not going to be in a position [we’re] taking options off the
table for the commander-in-chief.”
According
to a recent report, some of top Washington officials are considering
striking positions of the Syrian military without a UN Security
Council resolution.
As
one administration official has told the Washington Post, there had
been an offer to “get
around the White House’s objection to striking the Assad regime
without a UN Security Council resolution” and “carry out the
strikes covertly and without public acknowledgment.”
Covert strikes on Assad back on US table to prevent ‘fall of Aleppo’ – report
On
Thursday, Russia’s Defense Ministry issued a warning to the US-led
coalition, cautioning it not to proceed with strikes given a large
deployment of S-300 and S-400 air defense systems.
Even
though these air defense systems are primarily meant for protecting
Russia’s troops stationed at the Tartus naval supply base and the
Khmeimim airbase, the ministry warned that there is a risk that the
radius of the weapons reach may be “a
surprise” to
all unidentified flying objects.
When
asked to comment on Russia’s warning, Earnest said that he did not
see “that
statement” and
went on to stress that America’s intent was to reduce the
violence.
“There
is no interest in escalating the violence in Syria. We want to see
the violence reduced. That is what we're working to try to
affect,” he
said.
US-led
coalition jets bombed positions of the Syrian government forces on
September 17, resulting in the deaths of 83 servicemen. Washington
said the airstrike was a mistake, but Damascus claimed the incident
was “blatant
aggression.”
<
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.