The bad news keeps coming
This Is NOT A Drill - Russia Moving Artillery
This Is NOT A Drill - Russia Moving Artillery
Russia
is moving old artillery close to Ukraine. It appears that Russia is
not doing this as a drill but concerned over NATO advancement and
buildup on its borders. There has been recent info regarding troop
movement from NATO in Poland for October 10th. Russia may be taking
precautions.
Links: https://www.rt.com/usa/360483-us-whit...
http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/09/just.
Links: https://www.rt.com/usa/360483-us-whit...
http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/09/just.
Hush
hush the Russians pulled out of mothballs older systems up to date of
the 80, forming two new divisions of heavy artillery, that is
equipped with a 240 self-propelled mortars "Tulipan" and
the second with a 203-mm self-propelled guns 2C7M Malka.
Old
weapons, equipped with new positioning systems ammunition "smart"
guided, useless against stealth aircraft, but deadly against armies
on the ground, and especially against the Ukrainian.
Not
that move a thousand armored vehicles and twelve thousand men is a
great effort for Russia, perhaps only one other move in the chess
game against Kiev, a warning to urge them not to attack the
separatists again.
Zitti
zitti i russi tirano fuori dalla naftalina vecchi sistemi aggiornati
degli anni 80, formando due nuove divisioni di artiglieria pesante,
ovvero un dotata di 240 mortai semoventi “Tulipan” e la seconda
con i cannoni semoventi da 203-mm 2C7M Malka.
Armi
vecchie , dotate di nuovi sistemi di posizionamento di munizioni
“intelligenti” guidate, inutili contro gli aerei stealth ma
micidiali contro eserciti a terra, e soprattutto contro quello
ucraino.
Non
che spostare un migliaio di mezzi blindati e dodicimila uomini sia un
grande sforzo per la Russia, forse solo una altra mossa nella partita
a scacchi contro Kiev, un avvertimento per spingerli a non attaccare
nuovamente i separatisti.
Russia
Reactivates Artillery Systems: moves them to Ukraine border
September
23, 2016 - Fort Russ News -
Yuri
Selivanov, Antifashist -
translated by J. Arnoldski
By
the end of this year, two self-propelled high-power artillery
divisions will be formed in one of the Southern Military District’s
artillery units. One division will be equipped with 240-,,
self-propelled Tulipan mortars and the second will be armed with
203-mm 2C7M Malka self-propelled artillery installations.
The
highlight of the report by the Southern Military District’s press
service is that we are dealing with quite old systems, a large part
of which were pulled back into reserve in the 1990’s. Even a
glance at the photo at the top of this article is enough to
understand that we are talking about quite aged weapons systems.
Nevertheless,
these are heavy-duty installations which still do not have any
equivalent artillery analogues and are still of significant
military value. This is true especially considering their
undergoing modernization, which increases their accuracy at hitting
targets located at a distance of dozens of kilometers.
Putting
these artillery systems back in operation might indicate a certain
adjustment in the plans of deploying Russian armed forces on the
border with Ukraine given the extreme uncertainty of the military
and political situation and the possibility of “surprises” from
our so-called “Western partners.”
The
risk of an unpredictable turn of events is probably being
considered by the Russian command as highly relevant insofar as,
along with planned rearming of the army with new military
equipment, the military has resorted to increasing the combat power
of troops by reactivating the arsenals of, albeit old, formidable
weapons.
This
is being done despite the fact that the most important benchmark of
the current state program on rearming the army is none other than
the distribution of new equipment. This might spoil a few planned
indicators. But, apparently, the reality of the situation is such
that these indicators are no longer seen as the main priority.
Retired Green Beret Warns "We Haven't Been This Close To Nuclear War In A Long Time"
As can readily
be seen by the current events, the world has not been this close to a
nuclear war and World War 3 in a long time. There
are four major flashpoints right now that could easily escalate and
ignite a powder keg, transforming from a regional conflict or
conflicts into a world war: Syria,
the South China Sea, Ukraine, and North and South Korea. The
“reconstruction” of a Cold War-type faceoff, initiated by the
U.S. and NATO building up forces in Eastern Europe and facing off
against Russia.
A nuclear
war will
be initiated by an EMP (Electromagnetic
Pulse) detonation over the continental U.S., followed by a nuclear
exchange and a war
with conventional forces.
As of this writing, the
U.S. has “mistakenly” bombed Syrian governmental military forces,
causing at least 60 deaths with more than 100 others wounded.
The Russian government is sizzling, especially with the response by
(of all people) Samantha Power, U.S. Ambassador to the UN had this to
say to the media, as reported by CNN:
“We are investigating the incident. If we determine that we did indeed strike Syrian military personnel, that was not our intention. And we of course regret the loss of life.”
True humanitarians, all,
and especially she, the wife of Cass Sunstein and a true Marxist
disciple of the Weather Underground (along with Cass) regrets the
loss of life. The airstrikes occurred just two days before the
U.S. and Russia were supposed to have joint airstrikes against ISIS.
As ISIS is a creation of the U.S. State Department and the
administration, it seems the U.S. decided to strike
their true intended
target…the Assad government forces…as it wants to topple Syria,
and escalate things with the Russians.
Meanwhile last
week, the U.S. flew two B-1B nuclear bombers along the DMZ to bluster
North Korea with a show of force in response to the nuclear bomb test
they conducted just a week prior. South
Korea also threatened to reduce Pyongyang to ashes, while North Korea
prepares for yet another nuclear test in the near future. More
than 20 missile tests have been conducted by North Korea just this
year alone. This is not counting the satellite launch at the
beginning of the year in which they placed their second satellite
into orbit…a path of trajectory, mind you, that takes it over the
continental U.S. several times per day.
Ukraine cease fire
agreements between the populist forces (rebels) in the eastern
provinces and the U.S.’s puppet Poroshenko-government has been
violated innumerable times as the fighting in Donetsk continues.
In the meantime, the IMF just approved a 2-billion-dollar loan to
Ukraine and the U.S. is supplying Poroshenko’s government with
“nonlethal” U.S. military equipment. Russia has been
posturing a tremendous number of troops (some DOD estimates range as
high as 150,000) on its western border facing Ukraine: they have
conducted military exercises, including some within Crimea, which
they annexed from Ukraine in 2014.
The United States has
been beefing up its presence in the Baltic States of Latvia,
Lithuania, and Estonia, as well as in Poland and Moldova, the latter
emplacing U.S. missile systems for “defense” that can be
converted to offensive, nuclear missiles in hours. In addition
to this, the U.S. is deploying B-61 nuclear bombs to Germany’s
Buchel airbase. Russia has countered with ordering the
deployment of the Iskander-M missiles to Kaliningrad, Russia’s
westernmost military base in a direct standoff against the U.S.
buildup in Germany and Eastern Europe.
Meanwhile things in the
South China Sea are heating up as the U.S. has moved naval assets
into the area in a show of force in support of Japan over the
disputed Senkaku islands face-off between Japan and China. Last
week the Russian navy linked its assets with China’s in the two
countries’ joint naval exercises that could turn into a combat
operation and a Chinese invasion at the drop of a hat.
There is a
slow buildup and preparation of media coverage that is trying to
paint Russia in the leading role of the aggressor in all of this.
It isn’t working, except with those who are ill-informed. The
bottom line: with the U.S. election year in complete disarray
and civil
unrest lurking as
a result of social and economic breakdowns, a war would be the
perfect thing to justifysuspension
of the elections and
the inculcation of martial law in the “interests of national
security.” The general civilian publics of all of the nations
would be the ones to suffer, and it wouldn’t be the first time that
it happened. Politicians
– the ones who “regret the loss of life” in a war – are not
the ones to lose their own lives or the lives of their children when
the balloon goes up.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.