"Intentional" but" not terrorism"
These attacks are heaven-sent as the United States tries to cover up its association with ISIS.
Police Seek Motive Behind NYC Bombing, As Strange SJW Manifesto Take Credit For Explosion
In
a day in which the Islamic State claimed responsibility for a
"soldier" who stabbed nine people in a Minnesota Mall,
authorities were urgently trying to avoid labeling last night's IED
explosion in midtown Manhattan which injured 29 people, as the second
terrorist attack in the same day. So, it not terrorism, what was it?
According to the latest attempt to steer the narrative, and as we
reported last night, investigators are treating the explosion as an
“intentional act,” and while they haven’t ruled out terrorism,
weren't willing to label the explosion as a terrorist act until
authorities had a better idea of a motive, Mayor Bill de Blasio
said......
An
explosion occurred at a train station in Elizabeth, New Jersey, after
a suspicious backpack was found. The detonation was not controlled,
the city's mayor said. Meanwhile, the FBI has questioned five people
in connection with Saturday’s Manhattan blast.
Elizabeth's
mayor, Christian Bollwage, said the blast occurred when authorities
were trying to "disarm" the backpack, and that the
explosion was not controlled.
"This
was an explosive device" containing as many as five devices,
Bollwage said. "Based on the loudness, I think people could have
been severely hurt or injured if they had been in the vicinity."
A
law enforcement official confirmed the bag contained pipe bombs, The
New York Times reported.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.