In
retaliation against the Russian reponse to the act of war agaisnt the
Syrian army and open support of ISIS the Americans have come up with
a ludicrous it-for-tat accusation that the Russians bombed a
humanitarian convoy in Aleppo
Syria conflict: US 'holds Russia responsible' for deadly aid attack
Russian, Syrian Air Forces did not strike UN aid convoy in Aleppo - Russian MoDRT,
20
September, 2016
The
Russian Center for Reconciliation said that it had used drones to
accompany the convoy because its route passed through territory
controlled by the rebels, but only to a certain point.
On Tuesday the United Nations has reversed allegations that its aid convoy in Syria was the target of an airstrike. "We are not in a position to determine whether these were in fact airstrikes. We are in a position to say that the convoy was attacked," UN humanitarian spokesman Jens Laerke said.
Peskov
also pointed out that terrorists from Jabhat Al-Nusra (Al-Nusra
Front) had been firing rockets at areas under the control of the
Syrian government.
Russian
and Syrian warplanes did not launch airstrikes on an aid convoy that
was attacked en route to Aleppo, the Russian Defense Ministry said.
The ministry added that only the militants who control the area had
information regarding the location of the convoy.
“Russian
and Syrian warplanes did not carry out any airstrikes on a UN
humanitarian aid convoy in the southwest of Aleppo,”
Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said in a statement
Tuesday.
"Around
13:40 Moscow time (10:40 GMT) the aid convoy successfully reached the
destination. The Russian side did not monitor the convoy after this
and its movements were only known by the militants who were in
control of the area,”
Konashenkov dded.
The
Defense Ministry spokesman said that the Russian military had been
looking at video footage from the scene and that there was no sign of
the convoy being targeted by shells or an airstrike.
“We
have closely studied the video footage from where the incident took
place and we did not find any signs of any ammunition having hit the
convoy. There are no craters, while the vehicles have their chassis
intact and they have not been severely damaged, which would have been
the case from an airstrike,” Konashenkov
said.
“All
of the video footage demonstrates that the convoy caught fire, which
strangely happened almost at exatly at the same time as militants
started a large scale offensive on Aleppo.”
The
Red Cross said that at least 20 civilians and one aid worker had been
killed after what the organization believed was an airstrike struck
the 31-truck convoy.
The
aid worker was identified as Omar Barakat, the director of a
sub-branch of the Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC), which was helping
with the delivery of aid intended to reach rebel-held areas of
Aleppo.
Aid
is seen strewn across the floor in the town of Orum al-Kubra on the
western outskirts of the northern Syrian city of Aleppo on September
20, 2016, the morning after a convoy delivering aid was hit by a
deadly air strike. © Omar Haj Kadour / AFP
“Today,
the Red Cross and Red Crescent is in mourning. In solidarity with the
Syrian Arab Red Crescent, we are calling on the international
community to ensure the protection of humanitarian aid workers and
volunteers. We are not part of this conflict,” Tadateru
Konoe, the president of the International Federation of Red Cross and
Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), said in a statement.
On Tuesday the United Nations has reversed allegations that its aid convoy in Syria was the target of an airstrike. "We are not in a position to determine whether these were in fact airstrikes. We are in a position to say that the convoy was attacked," UN humanitarian spokesman Jens Laerke said.
The
UN spoke of a draft error while referring to the initial term of
‘airstrike.’
Meanwhile,
White House on Tuesday asserted that it holds Russia“responsible
for air strikes in this space, given that their commitment under the
cessation of hostilities was to certainly ground air operations where
humanitarian assistance is flowing,” Reuters
quoted deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes as saying. Rhodes
called the alleged bombing an “enormous
humanitarian tragedy.”
Benoit
Matsha-Carpentier, the head of communications at the IFRC, spoke to
RT and said there has been a loss of life, but it is difficult to
understand fully what has happened.
“We
have very diverse information and it is quite difficult to get a full
picture of the situation,” he
said. “Very
tragically, we have volunteers from the Red Crescent who have been
attacked. We have information that several people have died, but we
don’t have confirmation on the identities.”
The
SARC said it would suspend aid deliveries in Syria for three days in
protest at the airstrikes on the convoy.
Meanwhile,
the UN said it will be suspending all its aid convoys while the
security situation in Syria is assessed.
"As
an immediate security measure, other convoy movements in Syria have
been suspended for the time being pending further assessment of the
security situation," UN
humanitarian aid spokesman Jens Laerke said. He added that the UN had
received permission from the Syrian government to deliver aid to all
areas of the country.
The
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is also postponing an
aid convoy that was to deliver supplies to four besieged Syrian
towns.
A
damaged truck carrying aid is seen on the side of the road in the
town of Orum al-Kubra on the western outskirts of the northern Syrian
city of Aleppo on September 20, 2016, the morning after a convoy
delivering aid was hit by a deadly air strike. © Omar Haj Kadour /
AFP
Earlier,
the Kremlin said it was assessing the situation, while Vladimir
Putin’s press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, said it would be incorrect
to make hasty conclusions when trying to apportion blame.
“I
do not think it is possible and correct to make unfounded
conclusions. At the moment, our military is checking information
regarding the airstrike and I hope they are getting concrete
information from first-hand sources that were present in order to
present their own findings,” he
said.
“We
know that the Syrian armed forces, who for the whole week have been
the only party to have kept to the terms of the ceasefire, had to
respond to this offensive,” he
said.
Washington
was quick to blame Russia for the attack on the aid convoy, even if
Moscow’s planes were not involved, as it had responsibility for
controlling Syrian government forces under the terms of the ceasefire
agreement.
“The
destination of this convoy was known to the Syrian regime and the
Russian Federation and yet these aid workers were killed in their
attempt to provide relief to the Syrian people,” US
State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement.
“The
United States will raise this issue directly with Russia. Given the
egregious violation of the cessation of hostilities we will reassess
the future prospects for cooperation with Russia,” he
added.
For
its part, Russia’s Foreign Ministry has issued a statement,
accusing Washington of attempting to draw attention away from the
US-led coalition’s fatal “mistake” from
last week, when it repeatedly struck at Syrian government positions,
killing over 60 troops and injuring over 100 people.
“Such
unfounded, premature accusations, among other things, are designed,
as it seems, to turn attention away from a strange “mistake” made
by the pilots of the US-led coalition on September 17, when its
warplanes were bombing the positions of the Syrian government forces
near Deir ez-Zor,” the
statement reads.
Political
commentator John Wight told RT that it was hypocritical to blame the
Russians, adding that Washington has constantly rejected Moscow’s
requests to share intelligence regarding the location of militants.
“Clearly
we are seeing a pattern where any civilian target that is hit in
these airstrikes is automatically blamed on Russia or Syria and never
on the US or its allies,” he
said.
“It
is deeply, deeply hypocritical of the Americans to blame the Russians
when they have been denying cooperation with Russia, who has been
calling for cooperation throughout this conflict, in order to target
the rebels,” he
added.
Militants on pickup with mortar use Aleppo aid convoy as cover, Russian MoD shows (VIDEO)
RT,
20
September, 2016
Militants
driving a pickup with a mortar sought cover behind the UN-led aid
convoy that was destroyed near Aleppo, the Russian military has said,
releasing a video from one of its monitoring drones in Syria.
The
convoy with humanitarian aid heading to the embattled city of Aleppo
can be seen being accompanied by a militant pickup truck, Defense
Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov has said.
The
convoy with humanitarian aid heading to the embattled city of Aleppo
can be seen being accompanied by a militant pickup truck, Defense
Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov has said.
“Analysis
of the yesterday’s drone footage monitoring the movement of the aid
convoy through the militant held areas helped to reveal new details,”
Konashenkov said. He added that the drone footage points at
insurgents seeking cover behind the trucks.
“The
video clearly shows how the terrorists are relocating a pickup truck
with a large-caliber mortar.”
The
footage shows the pickup in question riding alongside a line of aid
trucks, and stopping right next to one of them, so it can be seen
from one side only.
On
Monday a humanitarian convoy consisting of 31 trucks was attacked
while heading to Aleppo. According to the Red Cross, 20 civilians and
one aid worker died as a result. Initial reports by the organization
claimed the convoy had been targeted by an airstrike.
Russia
denied the allegations, citing the destruction levels of the affected
vehicles.
“There
are no craters, while the vehicles have their chassis intact and they
have not been severely damaged, which would have been the case from
an airstrike,” Konashenkov said.
On
Tuesday, the UN also retreated from its claims that the convoy was
hit by military planes.
"We
are not in a position to determine whether these were in fact
airstrikes. We are in a position to say that the convoy was
attacked," UN humanitarian spokesman Jens Laerke said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.