Huffington Post Removes Article Claiming Hillary Clinton Will Be Indicted
SAUL
LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
29 May, 2016
The
liberal publication Huffington Post removed an article on its website
Sunday claiming that the FBI plans to pursue an indictment against
Hillary Clinton on federal racketeering charges.
HuffPo
freelance contributor Frank Huguenard, a scientist and public
speaker, posted an article on the site’s blog entitled “Hillary
Clinton to be Indicted on Federal Racketeering Charges”.
Huguenard wrote:
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
Activity considered to be racketeering may include bribery, counterfeiting, money laundering, embezzlement, illegal gambling, kidnapping, murder, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other nefarious business practices.
James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.
The
piece was publicized on Twitter by conservatives including Clinton
critic Jared Wyand:
But
the article link now directs to
a page that says “404” with
a frownie face and the message “This is so embarrassing” after
Huffington Post took the piece down Sunday.
A
note at the bottom of the original article explains that “This post
is hosted on the Huffington Post’s Contributor platform.
Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site. If
you need to flag this entry as abusive, send
us an email.”
The
Huffington Post’s media team and also HuffPo senior politics editor
Sam Stein did not return requests for comment as of press time.
This is the removed Huffington Post article reposted
Hillary Clinton to be Indicted on Federal Racketeering Charges
James Comey
US
Politics,
29
May, 2016
The
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United
States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool
for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO
allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity
that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
Activity
considered to be racketeering may include bribery,
counterfeiting, money
laundering,
embezzlement, illegal gambling, kidnapping, murder, drug trafficking,
slavery, and a host of other nefarious business practices.
James
Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch,
Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent
argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal
enterprise engaged in money
laundering and
soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative
favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign
and domestic.
“The New York Times examined Bill Clinton’s relationship with a Canadian mining financier, Frank Giustra, who has donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and sits on its board. Clinton, the story suggests, helped Giustra’s company secure a lucrative uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan and in return received “a flow of cash” to the Clinton Foundation, including previously undisclosed donations from the company’s chairman totaling $2.35 million.”
Initially,
Comey had indicated that the investigation into Hillary’s home
brewed email server was to be concluded by October of 2015. However,
as more and more evidence in the case has come to light, this initial
date kept being pushed back as the criminal investigation has
expanded well beyond violating State
Department regulations to
include questions about espionage, perjury and influence peddling.
Here’s
what we do know. Tens of millions of dollars donated to the
Clinton Foundation was funneled to the organization through a
Canadian shell company which has made tracing the donors nearly
impossible. Less than 10% of donations to the Foundation has
actually been released to charitable organizations and $2M that has
been traced back to long time Bill Clinton friend Julie McMahon
(aka The
Energizer).
When the official investigation into Hillary’s email server
began, she instructed her IT professional to delete over 30,000
emails and cloud backups of her emails older than 30 days at
both Platte
River Networks and Datto,
Inc.
The FBI has subsequently recovered the majority, if not all, of
Hillary’s deleted emails and are putting together a strong case
against her for attempting to cover up her illegal and illicit
activities.
A
conviction under RICO comes when the Department of Justice proves
that the defendant has engaged in two or more examples of
racketeering and that the defendant maintained an interest in,
participated in or invested in a criminal enterprise affecting
interstate or foreign commerce. There is ample evidence already
in the public record that the Clinton Foundation qualifies as a
criminal enterprise and there’s no doubt that the FBI is privy to
significantly more evidence than has already been made public.
Under
RICO, the sections most relevant in this case will be section 1503
(obstruction of justice), section 1510 (obstruction of criminal
investigations) and section 1511 (obstruction of State or local law
enforcement). As in the case with Richard Nixon after the
Watergate Break-in, it’s the cover-up of a crime that will be the
Clintons’ downfall. Furthermore, under provisions of title
18, United States Code: Section 201, the Clinton Foundation can be
held accountable for improprieties relating to bribery. The FBI
will be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that through the
Clinton Foundation, international entities were able to commit
bribery in exchange for help in securing business deals, such as the
uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan.
It
is a Federal Crime to negligently handle classified information
under United
States Code (USC) 18 section 1924.
It is a Federal Class A Felony under USC
18 section 798.
Hillary certified under oath to a federal judge that she had handed
over to the state department all of her emails, which she clearly did
not. In spite of her repeated statements to the effect that
everything that she did with her home brewed email server as
Secretary of State was above-board and approved by the State
Department, the Inspector
General Report vehemently
refutes this claim. Hillary refused to be interview by the
Inspector General’s office in their investigation, claiming that
her upcoming FBI interview took precedent but it seems more likely
that Hillary is more concerned about committing perjury or admitting
to anything that can be used against her in a court of law.
“Secretary Clinton should have preserved any Federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary. At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the Department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act.”
Inspector General Report
Hillary
Clinton is guilty of exposing classified documents to foreign
governments by placing them illegally on her server, of sending and
receiving classified documents and conspiring with her staff to
circumvent the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by avoiding the use
of the State Department run servers. Some of the documents were
so highly classified the the investigators on the case weren’t even
able to examine the material themselves until they got their own
clearances raised to the highest levels.
While
there is an excellent cast to be made the Hillary committed
treasonous actions, the strongest case the FBI has is charging both
Bill and Hillary Clinton as well as the Clinton Foundation of
Racketeering. There’s no wonder why it’s taken this long
for the FBI to bring forward a recommendation. The rabbit
hole is so deep on this one that
it has taking dozens of investigators to determine the full extent of
the crimes that have been committed. Perhaps the most
interesting question here is whether or not the FBI’s investigation
will be able to directly link
The Clinton Foundation with The Hillary
Victory Fund. If this happens, the DNC itself may be in
jeopardy of accusations of either being an accomplice or of being
complicit in racketeering.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.