Pages

Sunday, 18 October 2015

Australia's human rights abuses

Crimes of Silence” in Australia against Refugees and Asylum Seekers
The Turnbull Government, Nauru and Frustrating Due Process

By Binoy Kampmark


17 October, 2015


Institutionalised brutality is a rather easy thing to replicate. It begins with a selected language, and ends up justifying monstrous conduct. It pardons behaviour, and it condemns victims. The global debate on refugees is characterised by its distinct lack of humanity, and Australia, leading the charge, knows no limits on how far that lack of humanity can go.

The response to the claims that a Somali woman was raped, and then brought back to Australia for an abortion from Nauru, only to then have her returned back to the offshore prison camp, is yet another inglorious tale. Canberra’s response was one of genuine disbelief that a traumatised individual might have required counselling about the procedure.
The immigration minister Peter Dutton decided to go one step further about this perceived wobbliness on her part – a “racket” exploited by asylum seekers had grown up to subvert Australia’s mandatory offshore system. (Repulsively, Australian detention centres, privatised and immunised from legal scrutiny, may designate asylum seekers refugees but not send them back to the Australian mainland.)
Accordingly, Dutton’s statement takes aim at refugee advocates and refugees generally. Regarding the circumstances of her rendition, Dutton was convinced that, “Comments from some advocates to the contrary are a fabrication, while some others appear to be using this woman’s circumstance for their own political agenda. They should be ashamed of their lies.”
Dutton certainly baulks against any notion of humanitarianism, a significant handicap given his ministerial portfolio. At 9:00am on Friday, he authorised immigration officials to take Abyan from her room at Sydney’s Villawood detention centre. The intention was to effectively render her back to Nauru. Before her legal team could get an injunction preventing her effective expulsion from the mainland, government lawyers informed the Federal Court that the application was futile – she was already in Honiara on her way to Nauru.[1] When it comes to expelling and rendering refugees, Canberra’s snail-paced bureaucrats suddenly get busy.
The Refugee Action Coalition’s Ian Rintoul explained to ABC’s AM program that, “What we now know is that she was at some point put on a jet to Honiara to get her out of the country, to avoid court action that might have prevented her being removed from Australia.”
The Australian Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, preferred a different tact to explaining why the government effectively sabotaged due process by speedily whisking Abyan away and out of the court’s jurisdiction. “The information I have is that [the] woman in question changed her mind about seeking a termination and that’s all I know.”
Abyan’s lawyer George Newhouse also disclosed to the ABC that his client wished to see a counsellor before going through with the abortion. “We asked for counselling, support and for her to understand the procedure she was about to undertake.” According to Newhouse, it was precisely in asking for such assistance that the government retaliated. “We are gobsmacked.”
There is certainly more to come. Authorities in Nauru, ever willing to show a colonial like submissiveness to the Australian metropole, have been happy to target alleged victims of rape by releasing police file details and names. A Somali woman known as Najma was one such individual. Nauru’s justice minister, David Adeang, shows little interest in the rampant sexual abuse taking place in what effectively are prison conditions for refugees and asylum seekers. He prefers to see detainees as habitual liars and detainee guards as victimised saints.
Adeang, and Dutton, may have minds cut from the same cloth, but ample evidence has been adduced to the Senate select committee investigating the Australian-funded facility of atrocious conditions. Effectively sending detainees back to such conditions brings the Refugee Convention into play, with such rendition violating the rule against non-refoulement.
Last month, the committee inspired by the gruesome findings of the Moss Review, which revealed the alleged sexual exploitation of detainees, including children, by the staff at the processing centre, found it was “not adequate, appropriate or safe for the asylum seekers detained there.” The committee further observed that, “There appears to be no other pathway for those affected by what they have seen and experienced in the Regional Processing Centre (RPC) on Nauru to disclose allegations of mistreatment, abuse or to make complaints.”[2]
Dutton’s desensitised response? It was an obvious witch hunt that unnecessarily rubbished a strong response against scoundrels seeking to come to Australia by unconventional routes.
With the rendering of a pregnant Somali woman back to Nauru, away from judicial scrutiny and review, on a Royal Australian Airforce Aircraft, the deeply militarised approach to refugees have been confirmed. It is a world of secrets guarded by threats of punishment; it is a world policed by former service personnel. And it is one treated as non-Australian, an issue for the Nauru authorities.
Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email:bkampmark@gmail.com

Notes




Australia dumps tetraplegic
Australia extradites wheelchair-bound Kiwi under controversial new law.

Key tried to force a backtrack on the law but Turnbull has refused to budge. Photo / Getty Images
18 October, 2015


A tetraplegic sent to New Zealand after 36 years living across the Tasman is the latest victim of Australia's tough new immigration laws.

The 56-year-old New Zealander, who asked to be identified only as "Paul", said the Australian Government "dumped me at Auckland Airport" three weeks ago.

He has no friends or family here and landed with only $200 and a voucher for a week's accommodation.

The case is a fresh embarrassment over the treatment of New Zealand-born convicted criminals by Australia.

It comes as Prime Minister John Key and his Australian counterpart met in Auckland yesterday when Turnbull described the transtasman neighbours as "family".

Australia's Department of Immigration and Border Protection would not comment to the Herald on Sunday last night.

Paul - who is wheelchair bound but has some feeling in his arms - said he was jailed twice after being caught self-medicating with controlled painkillers.

After the first incident in 2012 he served 13 months in jail. A few months after his release he was caught again and served a further seven months.

He was extradited last month under a controversial new Australian law which allows foreign nationals who have served a year or more in jail to be deported.

The man says he would be begging on the streets of Auckland had it not been for government-funded charity Prisoners' Aid and Rehabilitation Society (Pars).

"I feel like I've just been dumped - away from all my family and friends. I have nothing here."

Earlier complaints about the deportation system include Angela Russell who has spent 37 of her 40 years in Australia but is being sent here after being convicted of theft.

Junior Togatuki, 23, died while in a detention centre after his pleas not to be deported were rejected. He was 4 when he moved from Auckland to Sydney and told authorities he had "no memory" of New Zealand.

More than 200 New Zealanders are held in seven detention centres, including some who have lived in Australia their whole lives.

Key tried to force a backtrack on the law but Turnbull has refused to budge, saying only more resource would be poured into the appeal process to speed it up.

Turnbull said there had been a large number of revocations since the law was introduced last year but the numbers would go down as the backlog was cleared.

Paul, who broke his neck in a 2010 accident, said the deportation policy didn't take into account the severity of someone's crime.

"I'm not making excuses for what I did, but I didn't hurt anyone and I wasn't dealing anything," he said.

He was told his visa was being withdrawn by the Australian Government two days before his second jail term was up. He said he then spent an additional four months in a detention centre while his deportation was organised.

Paul's case, and that of other Kiwi deportees, is putting strain on Pars' resources, the Department of Corrections-funded service.

Tui Ah Lo, Pars' executive director, said the level of resource available to them has posed serious difficulties in trying to offer Paul the service he needs.





 no caption

A lawyer representing New Zealanders detained in Australia says the outcome of talks between the countries' leaders is disappointing.

At talks in Auckland yesterday Prime Minister John Key discussed the deportation policy under which hundreds of New Zealanders with criminal convictions had their visas revoked.

Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said no special dispensations would be given to New Zealanders facing deportation in Australia.

Lawyer Craig Tuck has two clients being detained in Christmas Island and Sydney who were hoping for more.

"Well the outcome is a wet tea towel really. Because nothing has changed except as I understand it they are going to speed up the appeal process which may or may not put more resources into it.

"But clearly the timeframes are extended now. It's open ended, it would be good to hear some specifics about how that is going to be dealt with," Mr Tuck said.

University of Otago law professor Mark Henaghan said the talks were hopeless.
Professor Henaghan said the situation was intolerable, and the talks went nowhere with little leeway from the Australian prime minister.

"I think basically he is saying we are doing the best we can, but at the end of the day he is not prepared to speed up the process. And there doesn't seem to be any explanation coming from Australia as to why the process is taking this long.

"Obviously deportation requires some paperwork and things to be carried out. But it seems incredible that the paperwork would take years."

Labour said it was encouraged Australia was taking steps to speed up the appeal process for those facing deportation.

Leader Andrew Little said a simpler, quicker appeal process was helpful, but warned there was still a major issue about the discretion being exercised for those subject to deportation.

"What we are seeing is people who have been born in New Zealand but left in childhood, grown up there, gone to school there, to all intents and purposes Australian. But when they offend and do a prison sentence, and are subject to deportation, they are effectively sent back to a country they have no links to."
John Key confident fewer kiwis will be held

Mr Key said he was reasonably confident progress could be made on the subject of New Zealanders awaiting deportation in Australian detention centres.

He said more resources being put into speeding up the appeal process for those wanting to stay in Australia should help bring down the number of New Zealand detainees.

"When somebody's visa is revoked, that happens early on in the process and actually they know the outcome of that by the time they finish their sentence in prison and therefore they don't need to go to a detention centre."

Mr Key said he hoped Australia would take on board this country's call for compassion for some of the affected New Zealanders.

Mr Turnbull said New Zealanders who had their visas revoked could choose to return home rather than be detained.

He said New Zealand citizens who committed crimes in Australia would not receive special dispensation from immigration laws.

But he said they were free to return to New Zealand and undertake their appeal to the Immigration Minister from there.


"They are able to travel to New Zealand. They are able to undertake their appeal to the Minister from New Zealand. And so there is no need for any New Zealander whose visa has been revoked and is in detention in Australia to stay there."

1 comment:

  1. we should do away with the anzac treaty ..the aussies dont deserve to have us help them .for years their banks have sucked the econemy out of new zealand ..lets use the same laws against them ..ive herd south auckland is a wash with aussie bikers ,causing trouble .

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.