Breaking news: FALSE FLAG IN MOSCOW!
27
February, 2015
Boris
Nemtsov has
been shot dead in Moscow. He was one of the most charismatic
leaders of the "liberal" or "democratic"
"non-system" opposition in Russia (please understand that
in the Russian context
"liberal" and "democratic" means pro-US or even
CIA-run, while "non-system" means too small to even get a
single deputy in the Duma). He was shot just a few days before
the announced demonstration of the very same "liberal" or
"democratic" "non-system" opposition scheduled
for March 1st.
 |
Nemtsov
with Yushchenko
|
As
I have already explained many times on this blog, the "liberal"
or "democratic" "non-system" opposition in
Russia has a popular support somewhere in the range of 5% (max). In
other words, it is politically *dead* (for a detailed explanation,
please read "From
Napoleon to Adolf Hitler to Conchita Wurst").
In the hopes of getting a higher number of people to the streets the
"liberal" or "democratic" "non-system"opposition
allied itself with
the ultra-nationalists (usually useful idiots for the CIA) and the
homosexual activists (also useful idiots for the CIA).
Apparently, this was not enough.
And now, in *perfect* timing, Nemtsov is murdered.
We all know the reaction of the AngloZionists and their propaganda machine. It will be exactly the same as for MH-17: Putin the Murderer!!! Democracy Shot!! Freedom Killed!! etc. etc. etc. etc.
There is no doubt in my mind at all that either this is a fantastically unlikely but always possible case of really bad luck for Putin and Nemtsov was shot by some nutcase or mugged, or this was a absolutely prototypical western false flag: you take a spent politician who has no credibility left with anyone with an IQ over 70, and you turn him into an instant "martyr for freedom, democracy, human right and civilization".
By the way if, as I believe, this is a false flag, I expect it to be a stunning success in the West and a total flop in Russia: by now, Russians already can smell that kind of setup a mile away and after MH-17 everybody was expecting a false flag. So, if anything, it will only increase the hostility of Russians towards the West and rally them around Putin. In the Empire, however, this will be huge, better than Politkovskaya or Litvinenko combined. A "Nemtsov" prize will be created, a Nemtov statue will be place somewhere (in Warsaw?), the US Congress will pass a "Nemtsov law" and the usual combo package of "democratic hagiography" will be whipped-up.
What worries me most is that the Russian security services did not see this one coming and let it happen. This is a major failure for the FSB which will now have a lot at stake to find out who did it. I expect them to find a fall-guy, a patsy, who will have no provable contacts with any western services and who, ideally, might even have some contacts with the Russian services (like Andrei Lugovoi).
As for the "liberal" or "democratic" "non-system" - it will probably re-brand the upcoming protests as a "tribute to Nemtsov" thereby getting more people into the streets.
There are folks in Langley tonight who got a promotion.
The Saker
To illustrate the points made by the Saker, see the following from the Guardian
And now, in *perfect* timing, Nemtsov is murdered.
We all know the reaction of the AngloZionists and their propaganda machine. It will be exactly the same as for MH-17: Putin the Murderer!!! Democracy Shot!! Freedom Killed!! etc. etc. etc. etc.
There is no doubt in my mind at all that either this is a fantastically unlikely but always possible case of really bad luck for Putin and Nemtsov was shot by some nutcase or mugged, or this was a absolutely prototypical western false flag: you take a spent politician who has no credibility left with anyone with an IQ over 70, and you turn him into an instant "martyr for freedom, democracy, human right and civilization".
By the way if, as I believe, this is a false flag, I expect it to be a stunning success in the West and a total flop in Russia: by now, Russians already can smell that kind of setup a mile away and after MH-17 everybody was expecting a false flag. So, if anything, it will only increase the hostility of Russians towards the West and rally them around Putin. In the Empire, however, this will be huge, better than Politkovskaya or Litvinenko combined. A "Nemtsov" prize will be created, a Nemtov statue will be place somewhere (in Warsaw?), the US Congress will pass a "Nemtsov law" and the usual combo package of "democratic hagiography" will be whipped-up.
What worries me most is that the Russian security services did not see this one coming and let it happen. This is a major failure for the FSB which will now have a lot at stake to find out who did it. I expect them to find a fall-guy, a patsy, who will have no provable contacts with any western services and who, ideally, might even have some contacts with the Russian services (like Andrei Lugovoi).
As for the "liberal" or "democratic" "non-system" - it will probably re-brand the upcoming protests as a "tribute to Nemtsov" thereby getting more people into the streets.
There are folks in Langley tonight who got a promotion.
The Saker
To illustrate the points made by the Saker, see the following from the Guardian
Russian opposition politician Boris Nemtsov shot dead in Moscow
The
rise and sad demise of Boris Nemtsov, a former Yeltsin loyalist who
became a remorseless critic
Investigators
are considering multiple scenarios of Nemtsov's murder
RT,
27
February, 2015
2/27/2015
Translated
from Russian by J.Hawk
Investigators
are considering a personal motive scenario of the killing, as well
as an contract killing by the Ukrainian sponsors of Nemtsov.
Izvestia
reports that the investigators are considering several possible
scenarios of Nemtsov’s murder. They are not excluding the
possibility he was killed for ordinary personal reasons.
“The
young woman who was with Nemtsov at the moment of his murder is a
citizen of Ukraine. We have established that she recently flew from
Moscow to Switzerland to have an abortion. The investigators are
trying to establish whether Nemtsov was her only partner, and we
are not excluding the possibility there was a personal conflict
over her,” notes a highly placed law enforcement source.
Nemtsov
himself went to Ukraine on many occasions and had many contacts
with the representatives of the local political and business
elites, which represent the “party of war.”
“They
could have given him means to destabilize the situation in Russia.
They could have well expected him to use the money to create a
schism within the Russian society. However, there was no schism,
rather the opposite—there was a consolidation. Once they realized
there was no result the sponsors decided to get rid of the
politician who could not carry out his task,” the same source
describes the second scenario.
The
third scenario also has political character.
“This
could have been a contract killing whose objective was to strike a
blow against the government through a provocation. Both internal
and external adversaries may have chosen their “victim” to
destabilize the situation in Russia. Nevertheless, one must express
surprise at the choice of the target. Given the record-high
popularity of the current government, Nemtsov was little more than
an average person who played a minimal role in society,” states
the law enforcement source.
Those
and other scenarios will be thoroughly investigated by the law
enforcement.
As
a reminder, Nemtsov was killed on Friday night in the center of
Moscow on the Bolshoy Moskvoretskiy bridge.
According
to preliminary information, the killer fired at least seven times
at Nemtsov, hitting him in the back, then left the scene. Nemtsov
died on the scene.
The young woman who was with him was not
injured.
J.Hawk's
Comment: I suppose the fourth scenario would be
that the Russian government had him killed, but that one is the
least plausible of all. This is simply not how politics are
conducted in Russia these days. Of the scenarios above, the
personal motive actually sounds the most plausible at the moment.
It seems unlikely that Nemtsov could have obtained large sums of
money and disposed of them without attracting anyone's notice. Even
if he did misuse them, why kill him? He would still be useful to
the Ukrainians alive. There's always a possibility Ukraine's "war
party" needed a martyr, of course, so their involvement cannot
be ruled out entirely.
However,
in the end, it does not seem coincidental that the young woman in
question, a 23-year-old actress-model Anna Duritskaya, a native of
Kiev, was with Nemtsov at the moment of his killing. She might have
had other lovers; she most likely has relatives. At least one of
them might not have been happy with her lifestyle choice. Moreover,
a contract killer would have likely a) not needed to fire seven
shots and b) would not have left a live witness on the scene.
Nemtsov’s Assassination: A Propaganda Attack On Putin?
Paul
Craig Roberts
Boris
Nemtsov, a Russian dissident politician highly critical of President
Vladimir Putin often sounded like an agent of Washington. He was shot
and killed today on a street near Red Square.
If
Nemtsov wasn’t assassinated by the CIA in order to blame Putin,
most likely Nemtsov was killed by Russian nationalists who saw him as
Washington’s agent.
Remembering
the Magnitsky affair that resulted in sanctions imposed on Russians
as a result of the US Congress over-reacting to a jail death in
Russia, Nemtsov’s death will likely be blamed on Putin. The Western
media will repeat endlessly, with no evidence, that Putin had his
critic killed.
I
can tell you one thing, and that is that Putin is much too smart to
play into Washington’s hands in this way. Moreover, Nemtsov,
although a loud mouth, had no impact on Putin’s 85% approval
rating. Nemtsov’s support resided in the Washington-funded NGOs in
Russia. If the CIA assassinated Nemtsov, they killed their own asset.
It
remains to be seen if the propaganda gains justify the CIA’s loss
of a Putin critic.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.