Unraveliling the mystery of MH17

Information based partially on information published by 

a German source and on unidentified correspondence, a Ukrainian pilot reportedly confessed (in exchange for money?) that MH17 was shot down with his plane SU-25 based at the airport in Poltava, No. 10902, using a cannon. 

The hit was executed in the direction of the plane's front. The plane was, however, flown during that particular mission by a Polish pilot with a US citizenship. 

At the airport, he served under the name of "Peter Hiller" [Heller?], age 41. The US contractor/mercenary was supposed to have left Ukraine on July 20 for Poland and then with a new passport (and a name?) for another country.

---Vladimir Suchan

Ukrainian pilot admits to shooting down MH17

UKRAINISCHER PILOT GIBT ABSCHUSS VON MH17 ZU

Allgemeine Rundschai Morgenpost,
25 July, 2014



Electronic translation from the German

Ultimately, the pressure was still too large. The Pilot of the Ukrainian Su-25, in the Presentation of the Russian General staff it was shown that was yesterday, the plane with his cannon became flightless shot. Consistently were photos of the crashed Boeing shown a clear bullet holes of Maschinengewehrkugeln that was consistently a frontal angle showed and hardly of a Buk missile arise. Many Pro-Russia Schreiberlingen in the forums and comments columns in the Internet came across this confession on relief. A small victory for the Putinversteher, so far unsuccessfully tried the Internet with their facts to flood.

A small collection of the usual arguments of the Putinisten:

For one, there is the change of power in Ukraine. This was according to a statement from the pro-Russian writer by a coup: Proof: Yanukovych is never resigned. If he does not, the President may only through an impeachment disempowered. In case of a positive decision of the courts, the Rada, the President, with a 75% majority of his office release. This was in the vote, despite obvious manipulations and massive intimidation the members by the right of the sector will not be achieved.

Another point is the all too obvious presentation of the new Ukrainian government Arseny Jaszenjuk on his website. There is, according to the Putinversteher clear that Jazenjuk an Agent of the West, so that the interference in the internal Affairs of Ukraine clearly transferred. Often in this context, the clear bias of Western Politgrößen on the Maidan called. Also it is n this context, within 24 hours of the foreign Ministers of Germany, Poland and France, and also from the West steered “oppositional representatives of the Ukraine” Klitschko (Konrad Adenauer Foundation), Tjagnibok (NPD/Swoboda) and Jazenjuk (NATO/USA) broken agreement on the resolution of the Maidan and the withdrawal of the police with Yanukovych called. The withdrawal of the police unit made for the violent nationalists the way to the storm of the president's palace free.

And then of course there is the Sniper. The shots on the Maidan were critical and free Western media unanimously Yanukovych in theShoes pushed. Evidence to date, there is no. Instead, summarize the evidence, that the Sniper from the Hotel Ukraina from had shot, this time in the hands of the nationalist insurgents. As proof of a telephone conversation with abgehörtes Catherine Ashton and Urmas Paet, as well as statements of the SBU and references from the population. The announced investigation into the operations by the new government is up today not been carried out. Supposedly, even trees on the Maidan please, for the tracks to blur.

Disagreements with the free Western democracies by independent media-established opinion, there are also with regard to the Anti-Terror Operation of the democratically-elected government in Kiev, Eastern Ukraine. Allegedly, the term “Pro-Russian” and “separatists” is an invention of the Westpresse. The people don't have the intention had Russia to join. The first bloodless protest only through the “brutal” attack of the Kiev troops to a civil war degenerated. In contrast, have peaceful citizens tried the tanks of the attacker with his bare hands to stop.

Finally, the seemingly most powerful Argument in the Putin Versteher:

There is the rule of law in a bid, the “presumption of innocence”, stating that as long as someone is innocent until his guilt is proved.

So far there for the crash of the Malayan aircraft is no evidence on the rebel underground, as yet, no evidence exists that the appropriate capacity would have.

So stick anyway, only the Ukrainian side as Hauptverdächtiger left. The claims also the Propaganda of the Russian vassals Malaysia:

• Supposedly was MH17 rely on a height herunterzugehen that a Su-25 fighter jet can operate
• An air traffic controller have MH17 instructed, contrary to all previous flights over the Bürgerkriegsterritorium to fly
• The show clear signs of a planned False-Flag Operation

Of course, here is clear, that the presented information is largely to facts.

An important aspect of the Putin-Fans but overlooked: The most important factor in the democracy is the freedom of expression. Without freedom, no democracy!

The work with facts is also a clear attack on the freedom of expression. Freedom of expression according to the Western Standard can only exist where facts are missing.

As far as the restriction of freedom of expression in Russia now is advanced, you looked significantly at the press conference of the General staff of the Russian army on Monday: While in the Western free media in view of the information shown immediately a storm of accusations in the direction of the obvious culprits would be severed in a healthy outbreak of explosive formation of opinions in the comments columns in would have led, were the fierce-looking generals, not a single free opinion formulate, who now because of guilt.

What are already the few facts against the overwhelming majority of free and independently thinking citizens, through intensive consumption unbewiesener claims in the Western media, an independent and unaffected opinion is formed?

What is the cumulative power of the responsible citizens of the West against an authoritarian Regime, which by the presentation of the facts, the opinion of manipulative in a certain direction will - in your namely!

What is the concentrated Typist so wonderful, Western opinion leaders, such as Robert Easy by the FAZ, Jochen Bittner in time, Jan Fleischhauer in the mirror, or Boris Reitschuster, the fantasielosen, wortkargen Russian Faktenpräsentation creative face, then value?

We must decide whether we want to live in a democracy, with freedom of expression, diversity, creativity, or in a dictatorship, where the Close of the facts to strangle threatens!

NEW MH17 SENSATION: 

German experts point finger 

at Ukrainian air-force jets.

Surface to air missile attack ruled out as calibre of cockpit bullet holes puts Ukraine pilots in the frame for MH17 murders

The Slog,
28 July, 2014



This is what a German pilot-cum-air technology expert Peter Haisenko has just published on the subject of the MH17 disaster (my emphases):

‘The misfortune of the Malaysian MH 017 is known to all. The flight recorder is in England and is being evaluated. What can come of this? May be more than you want to accept….if you look at the image of Cockpit-Fragments, this picture is certainly shocking.

Entry And Exit holes from bullets in the area of the Cockpit. This is not speculation, but analysis of clear facts: the cockpit shows clear evidence of bullet holes. You can see the entry holes and some exit points. The edges of the bullet holes are bent inwards, these are much smaller and round in shape. A 30mm calibre. The exit holes are less well formed and the edges are torn outwards.

Furthermore it is visible that the exit holes have torn the double aluminium skin and bent them outwards. That is to say, splinters from inside the cockpit blew through the outside of the cabin. The open rivets have also been bent outwards….There is only one conclusion one can make, and that is that this: the aircraft was not hit by a missile. The damage to the aircraft is exclusively in the cockpit area….

Armour-Piercing Ammunition. Russia has published radar data that a Ukranian SU 25 was close to MH 017. this corresponds with Spanish air traffic control that two Ukranian fighter aircraft were in direct contact with MH 017. Examine the weaponry of the SU 25: it is fitted out with a 30mm cannon Type GSch-302 /AO-17A, with 250 rounds of splintering exploding bullets on a belt – shrapnel rounds. 

The cockpit of MH 017 was hit from TWO sides, as there are entry and exit holes on the same side….’

Very compelling stuff, is it not?

Now read this (also German) article by defence expert Bernd Biederman, who offers equally sound reasons why the shooting down could NOT have been from a surface to air missile:

‘ the shooting down of the Malaysian Boeing on July 17 in the Eastern Ukraine“  could not have been hit by a surface to air defense missile” .

This is the assessment of retired Colonel Bernd Biedermann in an article for the daily newspaper published in Berlin “new Germany” (Thursday edition). Had splinters from a surface to air missile hitthe plane, it would have immediately caught fire, argues the NVA anti-aircraft missile specialist. His reasoning is because of the “enormous frictional heat that the splinters generate on penetrating the fuselage. A single splinter contains the same kinetic energy as a 40-ton freight car hitting the buffers at 60 kilometers per hour.” In the case of the Malaysian Boeing, scattered fires had broken out after the impact with the ground, because hot debris from the aircraft had come in contact with combustible materials.

Biedermann is familiar with Soviet and Russian air defense technology, he led units in the duty officer system in East Germany and taught at the Military Academy in the field of anti-aircraft missile troops.’

Articles are beginning to appear across the Web to the effect that Angela Merkel is disturbed by (and growing tired of) the incessant US propaganda being emitted in favour of its energy agenda….and so we must perhaps in turn view these articles in the light of her alleged new agenda concerning the creation of an alternative bloc to that of America. (More on this here in the near future).

But spin or not, these analyses make sense. The US State Dept has now shifted its position from ‘Russian atrocity’ to ‘tragic accident’. The above opinions suggest that neither are true: they suggest strongly that the Ukrainian air force took out MH17.