Russia
and the Ukraine are out of the headlines in the Guardian.
US-Ukraine loan ‘final rape and plunder by the West’
William Engdahl
RT,
2
April, 2014
The
law approved by Congress to grant a one billion dollar loan to
Ukraine is only a loan guarantee and will not even dent Ukraine’s
huge debts, 25 billion of which must be paid this year, William
Engdahl, a geopolitical analyst, told RT.
The
bill will also give more power to American NGO’s to promote
democracy in Ukraine, many of the same NGOs that helped create the
current instability in Kiev. This is the last thing Ukraine needs at
the moment, says Engdahl.
RT:
Washington is offering Ukraine a one billion dollar loan. Is it a
good deal for Ukraine?
William
Engdahl: If you look at the details of what they’re offering,
they’re not offering a loan of even one billion dollars. They are
offering a loan guarantee and the cost of that loan guarantee is that
Ukraine submits to IMF austerity like Greece did, and that will
simply open up their economy to the final rape and plunder from the
West.
But
the other point about this is that the debt of Ukraine that comes due
this year is a staggering amount. I believe it is some 25 billion
dollars that has to be rolled over. And a one billion dollar loan
guarantee… it’s hard to know who is more stupid in this piece of
legislation: the United States congressmen, who voted for this, or
the non-elected government of Ukraine, if they accept this –
because it is simply a no brainer on all sides.
RT:
Also the bill gives more power to America’s co-called “democracy
promoting” NGOs. Are these the same NGOs that reportedly helped
topple the democratically elected government there in Ukraine a few
weeks ago?
WE:
Of course, they are. They are the National Endowment for Democracy
(NED), Freedom House, no doubt, the Open Society Foundations of
George Soros, who always seems to be paired up with these
organizations. John McCain is the chairman of the NED’s
International Republican Institute.He has been on the front row of
every regime stabilization in recent years. So these are not
democracy promoting NGOs, these are coup d’état NGOs, who are
doing what the CIA used to do, only through private agencies that are
backed up by the US government.
This
is not anything good for Ukraine. Ukraine doesn’t need this
nonsense. It’s interference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign
country. But since when has Washington or at least the Congress been
concerned about that?
RT:
So, if they are not going to promote democracy, how exactly are their
NGOs going to influence political life in Ukraine?
WE:
Well, as you pointed out, the NGOs prepared the way for the last
several years, well before the decision not to join the EU
confederation agreement taken by Viktor Yanukovich’s government
last November. They had been preparing to oust the Moscow-leaning
Yanukovich, a fairly elected presidentof Ukraine, and create the
incident using canvas operatives from Belgrade financed by US
taxpayers money, to train activists assembled in Maidan Square and
create the movement that shapes exactly what the government will or
will not be able to do.
And
to do more of that for Ukraine… I think Ukraine needs a little
break from all of this.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.