Russian/Ukrainian economic news

Forget Russia Dumping U.S. Treasuries … Here’s the REAL Economic Threat

George Washington Blog,

21 March, 2013

Russia Could Crush the Petrodollar

Russia threatened to dump its U.S. treasuries if America imposed sanctions regarding Putin’s action in the Crimea.

Zero Hedge argues that Russia has already done so.

But veteran investor Jim Sinclair argues that Russia has a much scarier financial attack which it can use against the U.S.

Specifically, Sinclair says that if Russia accepts payment for oil and gas in any currency other than the dollar – whether it’s gold, the Euro, the Ruble, the Rupee, or anything else – then the U.S. petrodollar system will collapse:

Indeed, one of the main pillars for U.S. power is the petrodollar, and the U.S. is desperate for the dollar to maintain reserve status.  Some wise commentators have argued that recent U.S. wars have really been about keeping the rest of the world on the petrodollar standard.

The theory is that – after Nixon took the U.S. off the gold standard, which had made the dollar the world’s reserve currency – America salvaged that role by adopting the petrodollar.   Specifically, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia agreed that all oil and gas would be priced in dollars, so the rest of the world had to use dollars for most transactions.

But Reuters notes that Russia may be mere months away from signing a bilateral trade deal with China, where China would buy huge quantities of Russian oil and gas.

Zero Hedge argues:

Add bilateral trade denominated in either Rubles or Renminbi (or gold), add Iran, Iraq, India, and soon the Saudis (China’s largest foreign source of crude, whose crown prince also happened to meet president Xi Jinping last week to expand trade further) and wave goodbye to the petrodollar.

As we noted last year:

The average life expectancy for a fiat currency is less than 40 years.

But what about “reserve currencies”, like the U.S. dollar?

JP Morgan noted last year that “reserve currencies” have a limited shelf-life:

As the table shows, U.S. reserve status has already lasted as long as Portugal and the Netherland’s reigns.  It won’t happen tomorrow, or next week … but the end of the dollar’s rein is coming nonetheless, and China and many other countries are calling for a new reserve currency.

Remember, China is entering into more and more major deals with other countries to settle trades in Yuans, instead of dollars.  This includes the European Union (the world’s largest economy) [and also Russia]. 

And China is quietly becoming a gold superpower…

Given that China has surpassed the U.S. as the world’s largest importer of oil, Saudi Arabia is moving away from the U.S. … and towards China. (Some even argue that the world will switch from the petrodollar to the petroYUAN. We’re not convinced that will happen.)

In any event, a switch to pricing petroleum in anything other than dollars exclusively – whether a single alternative currency, gold, or even a mix of currencies or commodities – would spell the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

For that reason, Sinclair – no fan of either Russia or Putin – urges American leaders to back away from an economic confrontation with Russia, arguing that the U.S. would be the loser.

Ukraine to Impose Wealth Tax on Deposits; Run on Ukrainian Banks Coming?

Global Economic Analysis,

21 March, 2013

IndexToday has an interesting story on a Ukraine Wealth Tax.

The Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy Yatsenyuk proposed on Wednesday 19th of March 2014 the adoption of taxes on wealth of the richest Ukrainians in order to tackle the economic crisis in the country, clarifying that the law will apply to him as well.

The Ukrainian prime minister stated that the proposed tax measures should apply on deposits more than 50,000 hryvnia (less than 4,000 euros). The measure is expected to affect approximately 10% of the population.

During the ministerial council meeting, Arseniy Yatsenyuk cited his own tax return as an example showing that interest on his deposits amounted to 714,000 hryvnia (47,000 euros).

Mr Yatsenyuk specifically stated: "Rich people ought to share their wealth with the country. It is time for justice. It is time to help the country".

The online financial newspaper Ekonomitcna Pravda criticized this initiative with the fear of a massive withdrawal of deposits especially nowadays that the bank sector is in a difficult position because of the political and economic crisis.

The Ukrainian economy is in a terrible position with a public debt of €75 billion, which the country accumulated mostly during the last years, and a huge financial deficit.

Run on Banks Coming?

Certainly, if I had money in a Ukrainian bank I would want to get it out. If everyone could, and did, there would be a massive run on Ukrainian banks.

I picked this story up from ZeroHedge Ukraine Goes Cyprus 2.0, To Tax Deposits Over 100,000 Hryvnia (To Appease IMF?).

He only had these two lines, likely from an economic feed, with and no links.

*UKRAINE PROPOSES NEW TAX ON DEPOSITS EXCEEDING 100,000 HRYVNIA

*UKRAINE TAX PROPOSAL WOULD INCLUDE 1.5% OF ALL DEPOSITS

No Peep in Mainstream Media

This is significant news, but there was not a peep on the Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, or the New York Times.

The only other reference I could find was Russian News on Rupaper.com: Ukrainian Authorities Suggested to Tax Large Deposits. This appears to be a translation and is somewhat garbled. I will post a paragraph "as is".

Over 50 thousand hryvnias (5,1 thousand dollars) need to be taxed Interest income of deposits. About it as L_gab_znes_nform reports, the prime minister of the country Arseniy Yatsenyuk declared. According to him, the relevant bill is already submitted on cabinet consideration. Yatsenyuk noted that he is the opponent of a tax on all deposits without exception, and specified that 90 percent of Ukrainians have deposits for the sum up to 50 thousand hryvnias. "Other ten percent rich have to share with Ukraine, it is normal, so does the whole world" — the prime minister declared. Yatsenyuk gave the personal savings as an example. He told that last year gained 613 thousand hryvnias of interest income, and from him didn't levy "any hryvnia taxes". At the end of February of this year the National Bank of Ukraine had to enter restrictions on removal of currency deposits in local banks in an equivalent no more than 15 thousand hryvnias per day. Such decision was made in connection with a mass conclusion of means from banks. According to the Central Bank, only on February 18-20 Ukrainians discounted about three billion dollars. In September, 2012 the Independent association of banks of Ukraine reported that champions by the size of deposits in the country are inhabitants of Kiev. The average size of deposits among capital investors at that time made 26,6 thousand hryvnias. The smallest deposits appeared in Zhitomir area — 3,2 thousand hryvnias.

Capital Controls

As I said, if I had money in a Ukrainian bank, I would want to get it out. But the above article explains limits on withdrawals were placed in February.

I mentioned capital controls on February 28: Ukraine Limits Withdrawals to 15,000 Hryvnia per Day (about $1,500)

Smart individuals likely took out 15 thousand hryvnias per day since the end of February. Really smart (or well connected) individuals wired out everything in January before capital controls were placed.

Moral of the Story

Here's a hint, if you see capital controls, figure a wealth tax confiscation will soon follow. And here's the moral of the story: If you think capital controls may be coming, get your money out of banks now.

Addendum:

The headline links and the articles in question imply a wealth tax on deposits. This translation provided by reader Andrey suggests it is only income that is taxed, not deposits. Either way, the moral of the story does not change, but certainly a tax on income is far less severe than a tax on deposits.

The Honeymoon Is Over: 

Ukraine To Stun Citizens 

With 40% Gas Price Hike

Zero Hedge,

21 March, 2013

Back in 2011, when as part of the Arab Spring one after another regime were toppled in North Africa following violent coups, not without substantial support by the US foreign service and the CIA, the local population was delighted - after all there is nothing quite like the specter of Hope and Change to lift one's mood, and murder the reigning dictator. 

Unfortunately, what is usually not discussed, is that within a very brief period of time, usually within a year or two, the post-coup nations promptly reverted to violence and kicked out the ascendent coupy rulers themselves. 

Hardly new, this is process has been observed in history throughout time, most notably with the French revolution, where the concept of the Thermidorian Reaction was first penned. 

Most recently, this was best captured by events in Egypt in the past year, when the Hillary Clinton-blessed regime of Morsi was toppled last summer with even more violent witchhunts organized against its Muslim Brotherhood supporters. No wonder one hardly hears a peep about this particular US success story.

So where should we look for the next such process? Why in Ukraine of course. Only right now the general population is still in its euphoric Hope and Change phase. Understandable - the evil regime has been toppled and the new and pure (even though in reality they are just as corrupt as the old ones) politicians are in charge, so why not look to the future with rose-colored sunglasses?

Alas, Ukraine's honeymoon period with its new rulers may end far sooner that most expect, and it will be certainly accelerated with news such as this. A few hours ago, Interfax reported that Ukraine expects to increase domestic gas prices by 40% once discounted import prices from Russia expire, the country’s Energy Minister Yury Prodan told journalists in the European Parliament on Thursday.

Just as we warned a few weeks ago when we were discussing the creeping capital controls gripping the crisis-riddled country with the foundering currency and its rapidly depleting reserves, the first thing that usually happens, with or without foreign aid, is runaway inflation. And a 40% jump in one of the core staples will certainly dent much of the quite brief and tenuous hope and change the population may have had as a result of recent events. Because once the downstream effects of nat gas funnel through the economy, we wouldn't be surprised if Ukraine ends up with hyperinflation of all goods and services within the year.

What is certain, is that the struggling population, most of whom never wanted the recent political overhaul and were quite happy with life as it was, will suddenly demand a return to the living standards under the old, if "horrible" regime, and demand an even quicker overhaul of the current administration.

Something Putin knows all too well.

Why does he know it? Because current events are a carbon copy of what happened in 2007 that led to the infamous 2008 Ukrainian political crisis.

What happened in 2007? This:

Ukraine agreed to pay close to $180 for every thousand cubic meters of natural gas it gets next year from Russia, Russia's state-run gas monopoly said, marking a nearly 40% increase over current prices.

The deal, which comes after months of negotiations between Moscow and Kiev, is part of what Russia describes as an effort to stop giving energy supplies to former Soviet republics at cut-rate prices.

That effort escalated into a full-blown dispute two years ago, when Russia cut supplies to Ukraine. The dispute affected some European countries, raising concerns about Russia's reliability as Europe's main energy supplier.

OAO Gazprom said Ukraine agreed in a deal signed by Ukrainian Energy Minister Yury Boiko to pay $179.50 for every thousand cubic meters it buys from Russia next year. Gazprom said transit prices would be set at $1.70, the price for gas shipping across Russia.

Ukraine currently pays $130 for every thousand cubic meters of gas from Russia.

In October, Russia urged Ukraine to make good on what it said was a $1.3 billion debt for gas shipments, a demand described by some Ukrainian officials as an effort to influence Ukrainian politics after September's parliamentary elections.

The deal comes a week after Gazprom said it would pay as much as 50% more next year for natural gas from Turkmenistan. Russia controls nearly all gas exports from the Central Asian nation.

Funny how history not only rhymes, but sometimes repeats itself. Verbatim.

China Takes Sides: Sues Ukraine For $3bn Loan Repayment

Zero Hedge,

21 March, 2013

It is widely known that Russia is owed billions by Ukraine for already-delivered gas (as we noted earlier, leaving Gazprom among the most powerful players in this game). It is less widely know that Russia also hold $3b of UK law bonds which, as we explained in detail here, are callable upon certain covenants that any IMF (or US) loan bailout will trigger. Russia has 'quasi' promised not to call those loans. It is, until now, hardly known at all (it would seem) that China is also owed $3bn, it claims, for loans made for future grain delivery to China. It would seem clear from this action on which side of the 'sanctions' fence China is sitting.

Via RBC Ukraine (Google Translate),

In 2012, The State Food and Grain Corporation and the Export-Import Bank of China agreed to provide Ukrainian corporation loan of $ 3 billion, which was planned to be on the spot and forward purchases of grain for future delivery to China.

...

Minister of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine Igor Schweich confirmed that China has filed a lawsuit against Ukraine in a London court for the return of a loan of $3 billion.

The Ukraine minister disagrees with China's case:

"filed false information that there are no claims to us from China. According to the contract have different interpretations, different interpretations, which led to the treatment of the Chinese side in court Gaft who works in London. Registered dispute between the parties exists," - said Minister told reporters.

According to him, the parties agreed to take the following week a representative of the Chinese corporation for the possibility of peaceful settlement of the dispute.

"We, for our part, will do their steps to ensure that the other party or retract its announcement, or we found another way to a peaceful settlement," - he said.

According to Schweich, a meeting will be held on March 26.

Ukraine appears to claim that these loans were made by the previous administration

The Minister added that the main problem lies in the fact that some leaders of PJSC "State Food and Grain Corporation of Ukraine" incorrect information. "These people are now removed during the protest," - said Schweich, noting that China "is relevant to understand.

In February 2014. the current Prime Minister of Ukraine Yatsenyuk said that "location $ 3 billion is not found."

While China has been relatively quiet in the background - though abstaining from the UN vote waqs a clear signal of relative support for Russia - this is a meaningful step in the direction of pressure against the West, as yet again, any bailout funds would flow straight to either Russia (gas bill sor callable bonds) or China (agriculture loans).