The doctors may be 'perplexed', but the rest of us have some idea of what might be causing this.
Doctors unsure what's behind dramatic increase in birth defects in rural Washington
Doctors unsure what's behind dramatic increase in birth defects in rural Washington
As
state and federal officials document the alarming rise of deadly
birth defects in rural Washington, health experts are at a loss when
it comes to pinpointing the source of the problem.
17
February, 2014
In
the three years prior to January 2013, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention found there had been 23 cases of anencephaly –
a birth defect in which a child is born without parts of their brain
or skull – reported in three Washington counties: Benton, Franklin
and Yakima.
This
rate of 8.4 cases per 10,000 live births quickly attracted the
attention of health officials, especially since it’s four times the
national average
Anencephaly
wasn’t the only severe birth defect confirmed by the CDC, however.
Three cases of spina bifida were also uncovered, a condition that
involves the failure of a baby’s spine and brain to develop
properly.
Since
the publication of the report last year, another eight or nine cases
of anencephaly and spina bifida have been reported by Susie Ball, a
counselor at the Central Washington Genetics Program.
The
most worrisome aspect of the whole situation isn’t simply the
increased rate of the defects, but the fact that no one is quite sure
what’s causing the problem. According to a report by NBC News, the
CDC inspected the medical records of hundreds of individuals, looking
for disparities between mothers whose children suffered birth defects
and those whose children were fine.
Despite
examining disease history, the types of medication taken, the source
of the water used by mothers, and other factors, the research
ultimately yielded disappointing results.
“No
statistically significant differences were identified between cases
and controls, and a clear cause of the elevated prevalence of
anencephaly was not determined,”
the CDC report stated.
While
some experts, such as the CDC’s Jim Kucik, speculate that the
cluster of defects could simply be an unfortunate coincidence, others
pointed out that since the investigation did not include interviews
of the mothers due to lack of funds, crucial information could have
been missed.
“If
there were resources, it really would be wonderful to go back to the
families to conduct more intensive interviews regarding common
environmental exposures,”
Allison Ashley-Koch, a professor at the Duke University Medical
Center for Human Genetics, told NBC.
Ashley-Koch
went on to note that considering the three affected Washington
counties contain a significant agricultural presence, the anencephaly
cases could be linked to prolonged exposure to pesticides or mold. If
the pesticides used in the area contain nitrates, it’s possible
they could be playing a role.
“They
may have eaten the same type of produce from a particular grower or
farmer, which essentially put all those folks at risk,”
she said.
Another
potential source of nitrates could be coming from private well water,
which typically contain far more of the compound than water from a
tap or bottle. As noted last year by the Yakima Herald, a Texas A&M
study found that women with high levels of nitrate in their drinking
water were at a higher risk of encountering birth defects.
Although
the root cause of the defects remains unclear, health experts have
often recommended taking folic acid on a daily basis to combat the
maladies. According to a report by the Texas Department of State
Health Services, this practice could potentially prevent 50-75
percent of birth defects like anencephaly.
For
Andrea Jackman, a Washington mother whose child was born with spina
bifida, the next step is to make sure the public knows about the
risks. She told NBC that for years she lived near an orchard that
employed pesticides and also drank well water, and was never informed
of the chances she was taking.
“There’s
got to be something. I mean, something causes it,”
Jackman said. “Every mother
wants their child to be perfect. If you could find a way to stop this
from happening, why wouldn’t you want to do that? Why would you not
want to tell people?”
The
CDC is expected to publish another report on the situation later this
year.
'Bizarre'
Cluster of Severe Birth Defects Haunts Health Experts
A
mysterious cluster of severe birth defects in rural Washington state
is confounding health experts, who say they can find no cause, even
as reports of new cases continue to climb.
17
February, 2014
Federal
and state officials won’t say how many women in a three-county area
near Yakima, Wash., have had babies with anencephaly, a
heart-breaking condition in which they’re born missing parts of the
brain or skull. And they admit they haven't interviewed any of the
women in question, or told the mothers there's a potentially
widespread problem.
But
as of January 2013, officials with the Washington state health
department and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had
counted nearly two dozen cases in three years, a rate four times the
national average.
Since
then, one local genetic counselor, Susie Ball of the Central
Washington Genetics Program at Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital, says
she has reported “eight or nine” additional cases of anencephaly
and spina bifida, another birth defect in which the neural tube,
which forms the brain and spine, fails to close properly.
“It
does strike me as a lot,” says Ball.
And
at least one Yakima mother whose baby is part of the cluster says no
one told her there was a problem at all.
“I
had no idea,” said Andrea Jackman, 30, whose blue-eyed daughter,
Olivia, was born in September with the most severe form of spina
bifida. “I honestly was really surprised that nobody had said
anything. If my doctor hadn’t wanted us to see the geneticist, I
wouldn’t have known.”
There’s
no secret, state and CDC officials said, and they noted that small
clusters of birth defects often turn out to be nothing more than sad
coincidence.
The
agencies released a report last summer detailing an investigation of
27 women with pregnancies that resulted in neural tube defects in
Yakima, Franklin and Benton counties between 2010 and 2013. That
included 23 cases of anencephaly, a rate of 8.4 per 10,000 live
births, far higher than the national rate of 2.1 cases per 10,000.
There were three cases of spina bifida and one with encephalocele, a
sac-like protrusion of the brain through the front or back of the
skull.
They
publicly posted the results of the investigation in press releases
and on state and federal websites. Those were picked up in news
stories, including one in the local newspaper, the Yakima
Herald-Republic. "State says no cause found for birth defect in
Yakima County," the July headline read.
But
it's not clear whether affected women saw those stories, and there
was no effort to reach out to individual families, said Mandy Stahre,
the CDC's Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer based in Washington
state, who led the inquiry. “There were very few of us that could
spend time doing this investigation,” Stahre said. “I’m not
sure the women knew they were part of a cluster.”
Health
officials originally were alerted to the problem by a nurse, Sara
Barron, 58, who was in charge of infection control and quality
assurance at Prosser Memorial Hospital, a 25-bed medical center in
the farm town set on the Yakima River. A 30-year nursing veteran,
she’d seen perhaps one or two devastating cases of anencephaly in
her wide-ranging career.
“And
now I was sitting at Prosser, with 30 deliveries a month and there’s
two cases in a six-month period,” Barron said. “Then, I was
talking to another doctor about it and she has a third one coming. My
teeth dropped. It was like, ‘Oh my God.’”
At
a regional medical meeting, there were more anecdotal reports. So
Barron notified state health officials, who started looking into the
problem.
“This
is bizarre,” Barron said. “This is a very, very small area.”
"This
is bizarre. This is a very, very small area."
Investigators
pored over medical records of the 27 area women with affected
pregnancies and 108 matched controls who received care at the same 13
prenatal clinics, Stahre said. They examined where the women worked,
what diseases they had, whether they smoked or drank alcohol, what
kind of medications they took and other factors. They looked at where
they lived and whether they got their water from a public source or a
private well. They looked at race and whether the problem was more
pronounced in the area's migrant farm workers or in other residents.
In
the end, there was nothing — “no common exposures, conditions or
causes,” state officials said — to explain the spike.
“No
statistically significant differences were identified between cases
and controls, and a clear cause of the elevated prevalence of
anencephaly was not determined,” the CDC wrote.
The
results were disappointing, but not entirely unexpected, said Jim
Kucik, a health scientist with the CDC’s Birth Defects Surveillance
Team who reviewed the results. There’s not usually one single
factor that causes such birth defects and it can take an examination
of a much larger population to find when something’s wrong.
“This
cluster is fairly small in size. It makes it challenging to find that
smoking gun,” he said.
A
group of birth defects can appear to be related, when it’s actually
just coincidence, Kucik added. “I think that there is a lot of
frustration when dealing with these type of cluster investigations
because they end up without a lot of answers,” he added.
Adding
to the problem is that investigations take time and personnel. Stahre
and her crew relied only on medical records for their study because
there weren’t resources for a full “boots-on-the-ground”
effort, Kucik explained.
“We
certainly don’t shrug off any indication of high rates of birth
defects,” he said.
But
that doesn’t help Andrea Jackman, who was an assistant manager at a
Yakima Blockbuster Video store when she discovered she was pregnant —
and then that the baby had spina bifida.
“The
doctor who did the ultrasound said she’d be in a wheelchair the
rest of her life. He pretty much told us she’d be a vegetable,”
said Jackman, who now lives with Olivia at the home of her aunt and
uncle in Ellensburg, Wash.
The
news was devastating, and Jackman initially considered ending the
pregnancy.
“Then
I decided that it wasn’t my decision to make,” she said. “If
she wasn’t going to live, it wasn’t going to be my decision.”
That
choice was a good one, she said, cradling a smiling Olivia as they
waited for a medical appointment at Seattle Children’s Hospital.
The tiny girl has survived surgery to close the gap on her back and
endured multiple MRI procedures to measure the fluid inside her
brain. So far, she hasn’t needed a shunt to drain fluid, and she’s
meeting all typical developmental milestones.
“It
was scary at first, but every time they see her, she gets better and
better,” Jackman said.
Olivia's
defect isn't as severe as some, but she's still considered part of
the cluster of neural tube defects in the region. Jackman said that
if she’d known that other area women had babies with similar birth
defects, she would at least have been aware that the issue existed.
That
concern is shared by experts in neural tube defects, who say health
officials should look harder — and spread the word about what what
they find.
“Any
time you see a geographic cluster of a pretty severe birth defect, it
does make you wonder if there is a common exposure contributing,”
said Allison Ashley-Koch, a professor at the Duke University Medical
Center for Human Genetics, whose focus is anencephaly. “If there
were resources, it really would be wonderful to go back to the
families to conduct more intensive interviews regarding common
environmental exposures."
That's
been true in high-profile clusters, including one in Texas in April
1991, in which three babies with anencephaly were born in a
Brownsville hospital within 36 hours. It sparked years of
surveillance and research that found that the problem could be traced
in part to the lack of folic acid in the diets of the mostly Hispanic
women who lived on the Texas-Mexico border. Obesity and diabetes
appeared to be factors, as did exposure to fumonisins, or grain
molds.
Research
has shown that there are potential links between anencephaly and
exposure to molds and to pesticides, Ashley-Koch said. Central
Washington is a prime agricultural area that produces crops from
apples and cherries to potatoes and wheat, which may require
pesticides that contain nitrates.
“They
may have eaten the same type of produce from a particular grower or
farmer, which essentially put all those folks at risk,” she said.
A
Texas A&M University Health Science Center study published last
year found that mothers of babies with spina bifida were twice as
likely to ingest at least 5 milligrams of nitrate daily from drinking
water than control mothers of babies without major birth defects.
The
study, led by Jean Brender, associate dean of research at the School
of Rural Public Health, found that nitrate levels in drinking water
varied widely according to the source, with average levels of 0.33
miligrams per liter in bottled water, 5.0 milligrams per liter in
public water supplies and 17.5 milligrams per liter in private wells.
“I
have a daughter in her childbearing years,” Brender said. “If she
were on a private well, I would tell her to have her well-water
tested or drink bottled water.”
Ashley-Koch,
the Duke professor, acknowledged that CDC and state officials faced a
tough task. It's difficult tracing back through previous pregnancies
and trying to find a common cause for birth defects, particularly
when not all of defects are the same. Still, she suggested that the
investigation may have been a “cursory approach.”
“Without
actually conducting interviews, it’s pretty difficult to discern
what potential exposures may or may not have occurred,” she said.
Sara
Barron, the nurse who discovered the problem, thinks that health
officials could — and should — do more.
“I
definitely believe something is going on,” she said. “There was
something. Maybe it just hit once and blew through, God willing. If
there are still cases going on, we need to know.”
Dr.
Joffre Olaya, a neurosurgeon at Seattle Children's Hospital, has been
monitoring the care of Olivia Jackman. Her mother, Andrea Jackman,
says the baby is doing better than anyone expected.
CDC
and state officials refused to tell NBC News how many new cases
they’d received in 2013, saying they plan a full report later this
spring. Stahre had previously said they’d received “a few more
cases” after the original investigation.
Susie
Ball, the genetic counselor who has reported additional cases, said
she's "not convinced — yet" that there's a problem in the
area and that it may take more time to tell. She wouldn't want to
scare people, she said. Still, she said the situation should be more
widely publicized to let local women of child-bearing age know the
risk — and to help them take action to prevent birth defects.
“Make
sure that everyone who could become pregnant knows they should be
taking folic acid,” Ball said, referring to the B vitamin that can
help prevent spina bifida. “Look at this unexplained spike here in
the valley. Take your folic acid.”
It’s
the lack of information that still haunts Andrea Jackman, who said
she lived near a pesticide-laden apple orchard and drank well water
in the couple years before her surprise pregnancy.
“There’s
got to be something. I mean, something causes it,” she said. “Every
mother wants their child to be perfect. If you could find a way to
stop this from happening, why wouldn’t you want to do that? Why
would you not want to tell people?”
Illegal dumping.
ReplyDelete