“The
clathrate gun has been fired”
---Guy
McPherson
This
is by Malcolm Light who first raised the possibility of human
extinction within a generation.
The
Non-Disclosed Extreme Arctic Methane Threat
The
2013 Australian above - average temperatures set a record of 0.22oC
higher than 12 month period prior to 2013 and confirm a mid-21st
century atmospheric methane-induced global deglaciation and major
extinction event.
Malcolm
P.R. Light
22
December, 2013
ABSTRACT
Pre-industrial
levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide never exceeded 275 ppm during
all of human existence but now exceeds 400 ppm (Gleick, 2013). Prof.
Jennifer Frances of Rutgers University (2013) shows proof that fossil
fuel carbon dioxide pollution has caused a massive atmospheric
temperature rise since 1960. Furthermore this carbon dioxide build up
has a delayed temperature anomaly of more than 12oC and is causing an
increase in the severity of storm systems as the evaporation puts
more energy into the atmosphere. There is uncertainty about when this
sudden delayed temperature anomaly will occur in the future but an
earlier anomaly was delayed by some 1000 years, 17,500 years ago
(Shakun et al. 2012).
In
the last 200 years the methane concentration in the atmosphere as
increased by three times and at a much faster rate than the carbon
dioxide to which it oxidises to in over 10 to 30 years (Shakova
2013). Furthermore over periods of a few months to a few years
methane has a global warming potential from 1000 to 100 times that of
carbon dioxide (Carana, 2013; Light 2013). IPCC estimate that all
global methane emissions and natural sources are some 548 million
tonnes/year with some estimates as high as 852 million tonnes/year
while hydroxyl breaks down about 540 million tonnes of this methane
per year (Carana, 2013). The IPCC has decided not to warn people
about the danger that these large methane emissions will lead to
abrupt climate change within decades (Carana, 2013).
Australia
has experienced a set of above average temperatures for a period of
15 successive months months since August 2012 which set a new record
temperature anomaly of 0.22oC above that of the 12 month period up to
2013 (NOAA, 2013). This temperature anomaly combined with the mean
temperature gradient determined by the difference between the
modelled estimates of, and the actual rate of floating Arctic ice cap
melting has been combined with other data to define a more accurate
global atmospheric temperature gradient caused by the fast increasing
emission of Arctic atmospheric methane from global warming
destabilization of the Arctic subsea methane hydrates.
The
best estimate of the time that methane eruption in the Arctic will
produce a mean atmospheric temperature of 8oC leading to total global
deglaciation and the major extinction of all life on Earth (IPCC,
2007) is 2050.6 +- 3.4 (N=8) with a total range from 2042.2 to 2052.8
(Figures 1 and 2, Tables 1a - 1d, Table 2).
The
lowest range extinction date of 2042.2 is 2.6 years later than to the
previous best estimate for the extinction of 3/4 of the Earth's
surface (2039.6) using aerial growth and methane GWP methods (Light,
2012 Figure 3) and is close to Carana's (2012) best estimate from
runaway global warming (Figure 4). The mean time of extinction of the
Northern Hemisphere was previously fixed between 2024 and 2039
(Light, 2012). The best estimate of final extinction (2050.6) is 3
years later than the mean estimate for the Southern Hemisphere of
2047.6 (Range 2038 to 2057)(Figure 3). Carana and Light's extinction
estimates are more than an order more accurate than the 50 year error
that has been determined between International global atmospheric
modelling estimates of and the actual rate of Arctic floating ice cap
decline (see Figure 5, thinkprogress.org, 2012).
In
the Angels Proposal (see; Arctic-news.blogspot.com) subsea Arctic
methane is extracted, stored and sold as LNG for distribution as
fuel, but permanent storage underground is more preferable (Carana,
2013). Methane can be permanently removed from the atmosphere, oceans
and subsea permafrost and stored in ocean basins at near ambient
temperatures and pressures in propane and ethane hydrates (Carana,
2013).
Two
symbiotic methane eating microbes in cold ocean waters excrete carbon
dioxide and need an enzyme that requires tungsten to operate (Glass,
2013). The carbon dioxide released by the bacteria reacts with
minerals in the water to form calcium carbonate (Glass 2013). If
these bacteria and enzymes were introduced in great quantities into
the Arctic Ocean they could eleminate the methane plumes before they
entered the atmosphere.
The
Lucy and Alamo (HAARP) projects were designed to break down
atmospheric methane using radio - laser transmissions (Light and
Carana 2013). In a new modified version of the Lucy Project,
hydroxyls will be generated by a polarized 13.56 MHZ beam
intersecting the sea surface over the region where a massive methane
torch (plume) is entering the atmosphere so that the additional
hydroxl will react with the rising methane breaking a large part of
it down. The polarized 13.56 MHZ radio waves will decompose
atmospheric humidity, mist, fog, ocean spray, and the surface of the
waves themselves in the Arctic Ocean into nascent hydrogen and
hydroxyl (Figure 6).
The
newly determined atmospheric temperature gradient indicates that the
mean global atmospheric temperature will reach 1.5oC in 15 years
(2028.5) and 2oC in 20 years (2033.4). Consequently we only have 15
years to get an efficient methane destruction radio - laser system
designed, tested and installed (Lucy and Alamo (HAARP) Projects,
Figure 7) before the accelerating methane eruptions take us into
uncontrollable runaway global warming. This will give a leeway of 5
years before the critical 2oC temperature anomaly will have been
exceeded and we will be looking at catastrophic storm systems, a fast
rate of sea level rise and coastal zone flooding with its extremely
deleterious effects on world populations and global stability (ICCP,
2013).
Introduction
Intelligent
survivors of extremely perilous circumstances plan for the worst case
scenario taking Murphy's law as the given truth - "If anything
can go wrong, it will go wrong". This paper further explores and
shows new proof that Humanity is facing an Arctic methane induced
firestorm by the middle of this Century. Emission of methane from
Arctic subsea methane hydrates is now out of control and is caused by
fossil fuel driven global warming of the Earth's atmosphere and
oceans mostly in the North Atlantic - Gulf Stream area (Figure 8).
The
recent deteriorating weather activity has shown the following to be
true:
Recent
measured Australian atmospheric temperature anomaly data
(0.22oC/year) (NOAA 2013), measured rates of methane emission from
the East Siberian Arctic Shelf and satellite derived Giss atmospheric
temperature anomalies confirm a Mid 21st Century methane induced
global deglaciation and major extinction event around 2050 (Figures 1
- 5; Tables 1 and 2). Australia experienced above average
temperatures for 15 successive months since August 2012 and set a new
record 0.22oC higher than the 12 months leading up to 2013 (NOAA
2013).
The
Sandy (2102) and Haiyan (2013) hurricane/cyclone catastrophic
disasters indicate that we have now passed a major climatic tipping
point. The Earth is now accelerating into a region of fierce climatic
events which will lead to chaos and death in both the developing and
developed world causing famine, massive migrations of desperate
people and widespread wars.
The
difference between the measured exponential rate of melting of the
floating Arctic ice cap and the global atmospheric modelling
predictions which are out by some 50 years has been used to correct
the time of atmospheric global heating due to fossil fuel greenhouse
gas emissions from the mean global atmospheric temperature gradient
(Figure 5; thinkprogress.org, 2012; ICCP 2010?).
A
giant pall of methane covers the Northern Hemisphere (Figures 9a,b))
and massive amounts methane have been erupting along the entire
length of the Eurasian basin and the Laptev Sea from October to
December, 2013 (Figures 10 - 12). The Eurasian basin was not a region
of major emissions in 2012 (Figure 10, Extraction priority map)
confirming that the rate of emission from destabilized Arctic subsea
methane hydrates has increased at such a pace that the differences
are now clearly discernable on atmospheric methane map data (Figures
10 and 11).
The
methane emission zones have not only spread over large regions of the
Arctic Ocean but have now started to appear strongly down the East
Coast of Greenland (Figure 10, bottom right image; Figure 11). This
confirms that the Gulf Stream (Atlantic) waters have got so hot that
they are now destabilizing the methane hydrates throughout the entire
Arctic Ocean and after they have made their exit from the Arctic
Ocean as the East Greenland Current (Figures 10 and 11) (Bourke et
al. 1988; Manley, 1995). This is in fact the warming effect of the
Canadian and United States pollution returning back as heat in the
ocean and the heat in the East Greenland Current will move
progressively southwards down the coast of Greenland detabilizing the
methane hydrates en route to the east coast of the United States,
releasing progressively larger amounts of methane (Figures 10 and
11).
The
East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS) methane emission rates have risen
from 8 million tons in 2010 to 17 million tons by 2012(Shakova et al,
2013). The mean rate of methane emission, 8.0952 tonnes per square km
has been calculated for the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS) (area =
2.1 million square km) from total emission estimates determined by
Shakova et al. 2013. This new rate of methane emission has now been
applied to the entire area of the Arctic Ocean (area = 14.056 million
square km) as a first approximation, because satellite data now show
that methane emission volumes from the ESAS are generally lower than
those from the Eurasian Basin and Laptev Sea in 2013 (Figures 10 -
12) (Note that the surface area of the Earth is 510 million square
km, Lide and Frederickse, 1995). Gulf Stream (Atlantic) water exiting
the Arctic Ocean is also destabilizing the methane hydrates along the
East Greenland shelf so it must be affecting the whole of the Arctic
Ocean before it go to that position. The destabilization of methane
hydrates in the Arctic Ocean is also a conservative estimate because
no account is taken of methane emissions from surface Arctic
permafrost regions or of other Northern Hemisphere continental
emissions.
The
atmospheric temperature increase in Australia this year (2013, 0.22o
C; BBC 2013) indicates that in 10 years it will exceed 2.2o C. In 30
to 40 years the atmospheric temperature anomaly will be 6.6o C to
8.8o C. An 8o C temperature rise will cause total deglaciation and
extinction of all life on Earth between 2040 and 2050 exactly the
same time period as the predicted temperature increase from the
exponential Arctic methane build up (Light, 2012; Carana, 2012).
The
start date for the Australian atmospheric anomaly of 0.22oC/year back
calculates to 2007.8 on the corrected gradient for measured Arctic
surface melt back (Figures 1,2 and 5) indicating that 2007 was the
main atmospheric tipping point for methane emissions (Table 1a-d).
After 2007 the subsea Arctic methane emissions have been increasing
at a fast accelerating pace (Figure 13). 2007 is exactly the time the
main atmospheric tipping point was predicted to occur from Global
earthquake frequency and magnitude data and the measured rate Arctic
surface melt back (Figure 13, position d). Worldwide earthquake
frequency and magnitude were inversely related between 1980 and 2003
when subduction was mostly driven by the density of the cooling ocean
crust and any increase in subduction rate and earthquakes generated
tension and reduced the magnitude of the resulting earthquakes
(Figure 13). Between location b and d on Figure 13, variations in
Arctic earthquake activity appear directly linked to larger bursts of
methane entering the atmosphere probably a result of earthquake
detabilization of Arctic shelf and slope methane hydrates. From 2007
(location d on Figure 13) the mean atmospheric methane exceeded 1785
- 1795 ppb and increased at a much faster rate than the atmospheric
carbon dioxide. This confirms that in 2007, the subsea Arctic Ocean
methane clathrate gun began to fire a continuous volley of methane
into the Arctic atmosphere (Figure 13, position d) and that we are
now power diving into extinction by the Mid 21st Century unless we
take immediate and drastic action to remove large volumes of methane
from the atmosphere.
When
different estimates of the mean atmospheric temperature (ranging from
14oC to 15oC) are used in global atmospheric thermal gradient
calibration they have a negligible effect on the methane gradient
temperature curve estimate of when the atmosphere will reach the 8oC
anomaly causing total deglaciation and major extinction. This
indicates that the massive temperature increase is almost entirely
due to the build up of methane in the atmosphere from destabilization
of the subsea Arctic methane hydrates. The Arctic atmospheric methane
is the killer and we need to immediately find methods to remove large
volumes of it from the troposphere and the stratosphere if we have
any hope of surviving the fast approaching extinction event (See Lucy
and Alamo (HAARP) Projects; Sam Carana's Arctic-news blog.
There
is in addition a delayed carbon dioxide and methane temperature
anomaly of 12o C to 20o C(see Frances, 2013). The delayed 20o C
methane atmospheric temperature anomaly is the same as the
temperature anomalies of hot clouds that have been blowing around the
Arctic this year (Figures 14 a,b). This indicates that the Arctic has
almost caught up with the methane delayed global warming heating. The
stage is therefore set for giant firestorms, catastrophic weather
systems, drought and sea level rise caused mostly by the uncontrolled
build up of methane in the atmosphere due to the destabilization of
the Arctic permafrost and subsea methane hydrates by carbon dioxide
induced global warming .
Methane
Hydrate "Clathrate Gun"
The
cause of the sudden temperature increase in Australia this year can
be traced to the fast building pall of methane in the Northern
Hemisphere caused by global warming of the Arctic methane hydrate
permafrosts and destabilization of the subsea methane hydrates
(Figure 9). At the moment, the entire Arctic is covered by a
widespread methane cloud but it is very concentrated (> 1950 ppb)
over the Eurasian Basin and Laptev Sea where the subsea methane
hydrates are being destabilized at increasing rates by heated
Atlantic (Gulf Stream) waters (Figure 10 and 11). The area of the
Eurasian Basin is similar to that of the East Siberian Shelf where
Shakova et al. (1999) indicate that some 50 billion tons of methane
could be released at any moment over the next 50 years from
destabilization of subsea methane hydrates, producing catastrophic
consequences for the global climate system. Consequently global
warming is probably now also destabilizing methane hydrates in the
Eurasian Basin, (Figures 10 and 11) starting the release of an
additional 50 billion tons of methane which will further compound the
catastrophe represented by the destabilization of methane hydrates on
the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (Shakova et al. 1999). Essentially we
have passed the methane hydrate tipping point and are now
accelerating into extinction as the methane hydrate "Clathrate
Gun" has begun firing volleys of methane into the Arctic
atmosphere (Figure 13).
Ice
- Core Temperature Methane Correlation
Arctic
surface temperature data with anomalies greater than 20oC above
normal (Yurganov 2012) indicate that the massive Arctic methane
enhanced heating threat is spreading and is now being seen as
increased dryness, droughts and wildfire problems and extreme weather
events in Russia, Europe, the United States, Australia, the
Phillipines and elsewhere (Light 2012a,b, Light 2011b, Light and
Carana 2011, Light and Solana 2002 a,b; Carana 2013). Giant methane
rich clouds with temperature anomalies greater than 20oC began to
circulate in the Arctic during the 2012-2013 winter indicating that
the Arctic methane emission rate is now growing substantially and is
probably out of our present control (Figure 14; Yurganov 2013 in
Carana 2013). The problem is that the anomalously hot (20oC)
circulating Arctic methane clouds are going to grow and spread out at
an alarming rate (Figure 14,15 and 16).
The
mean speed of horizontal displacement of the stratosphere around the
Earth is about 120 km/hr from the Krakatoa eruption in 1883
(Heicklen, 1976). Mean wind velocities in the region between 36 km
and 91 km height are some 48 metres/second during the day and 56
metres/second at night (Olivier, 1942, 1948). Shuttle launches have
shown that shuttle exhaust gases form noctilucent clouds which are
transferred at high velocities from equatorial regions to the north
pole in a few days (Figure 17; NASA 2007). It will therefore be only
in the wink of an eye from a geological standpoint that the 20oC
anomaly methane clouds will spread over the entire surface of the
Earth. As the 20oC temperature anomaly methane rich Arctic clouds
expand into the atmosphere they will trap the sun's heat beneath them
and heat up the Arctic ocean causing an increase in Arctic sea ice
melting and widespread destabilization of the subsea shelf/slope
methane hydrates. These 20oC methane rich clouds will also rise as
they are blown by Arctic vortices into the stratosphere where they
will increase the concentration of the methane in the Equatorial
stratosphere which is already above 1.8 ppm/v (Figure 16; NOAA, NASA,
2012) equivalent to a delayed temperature anomaly of some 20oC from
the polar ice core methane - temperature relation (Figure 18;
Morrison, 2012)
The
methane concentration - temperature correlation from polar ice core
data is graphically illustrated in Figures 18 and 19 modified from
Morrison (2012). This correlation which goes back to 420,000 years
ago shows that when the mean methane content of the atmosphere hit
1.79 ppm/v (1790 ppb) that it would produce a methane eruption
induced temperature anomaly of some 20oC (Figure 19). This is
precisely the temperature of the giant methane rich clouds that are
now circulating the Arctic in 2012 - 2013 (Figure 14; Yurganov, 2013;
Carana 2012, 2013) indicating that here, the delayed methane
temperature anomaly has already caught up with the Arctic mean
atmospheric concentrations because of the extreme methane emissions
from the subsea destabilizing methane hydrates (Figure 10).
Such
a huge Arctic temperature anomaly can only be produced by methane
with an apparent Methane Global Warming Potential of about 1850 times
that of carbon dioxide. It is clear however that the atmospheric
methane is only partly responsible for this high global warming
potential because of massive feedbacks due to the summer loss of the
floating ice cap and solar heating of the now exposed dark ocean
surface. This results in further heating of the Arctic ocean currents
and more detabilization of the shelf and slope methane hydrates
adding increased quantities of methane to the Arctic Atmosphere and
causes increased surface evaporation adding water and energy to the
atmosphere thus increasing the ferocity of storm systems, snowfall
and rain (See Francis, 2012 for CO2). In the Autumn and Winter, the
hot Arctic Ocean steams off, feeding heat and moisture directly into
the already overcharged atmosphere which all combined generate this
extremely high "Combined Global Warming Potential (CGWP) of
1850, that the methane emitted into the atmosphere shows.
From
the polar ice cap methane - temperature correlation (Morrison 2012),
it is possible to calculate when the mean temperature anomaly of the
Earth's atmosphere will reach 8oC at which time total deglaciation is
expected with a 68.3 m sea level rise (Wales, 2012). To achieve and
8oC temperature increase in the atmosphere we need only raise the
atmospheric temperature by 7.2oC as the present atmosphere has
already been heated by 0.8oC by global warming (Wales, 2012). On the
polar ice core methane temperature correlation chart (Figure 19 and
20; Morrison, 2012) the atmosphere was 7.2oC cooler in 1971.29 some
40.71 years before 2012. If we assume a linear relation applies, it
will therefore take about 40.71 years to increase the mean
atmospheric temperature to 7.2oC, i.e by 2052.71 at which time total
global deglaciation and widespread extinction will occur. This is
almost identical to the time defined by the latent heat of ice -
melting curve for an 8oC temperature rise (2051.3; Figure 3 and Table
2). and is similar to the melt back time of glaciers (2052) and the
new mean of 2050.6 determined in this paper (Figures 21 a,b,c).
A
concentration of 1250 ppb methane in the atmosphere will make an
atmospheric temperature anomaly of 11 to 12oC, leading to total
deglaciation and extinction (Figures 18, 19 and Table 3). The polar
ice core delayed methane temperature anomaly at 1000 ppb methane is
8oC, at 727 ppb methane, it is 2oC and 673 ppb methane it is 1oC
(Table 3). We clearly have to destroy more than 62% to 64 % of the
present methane content of the atmosphere before the Earth will have
a livable atmosphere (Table 3). This also means stopping all the
Arctic methane eruptions by depressurizing the methane under the
subsea methane hydrates to stabilize the methane content of the
atmosphere (Angels Project; Arctic-news.blogspot.com). This methane
could be used as a fuel but is better sequestered in stable propane
hydrates on the ocean shelves (Figures 22a,b,c,d Carana, 2013).
The
atmosphere contains about 5 billion tons of methane, but about half
of the present global warming is caused by some 3 billion tonnes of
methane that have been added to the atmosphere since the
concentration reached 1750 ppb (Carana 2013). Shakova et al 2010a
estimate that some 50 billion tonnes of methane could erupt at any
moment on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS), where some 1700
billion tonnes of methane could be held in the form of free gas and
methane hydrates. This will cause a worldwide temperature anomaly of
more than 10oC above the present atmospheric mean and as the methane
spreads around the world's atmosphere will lead to our certain
extinction in the next 20 to 40 years (Light 2012a,b; Light 2011b).
The polar ice core atmospheric methane-temperature correlation
(Figure 18 and 19) indicates however that an atmospheric methane
concentration of 1790 ppb to 1850 ppb will produce a delayed mean
atmospheric temperature anomaly of 20oC totally eclipsing the Major
Permian Extinction Event by some 14oC (Figure 3). Furthermore Prof.
Jennifer Francis has shown that the present CO2 content of the
atmosphere has a delayed temperature anomaly more than 12oC (Figures
23 a,b) which is higher than the Major Permian Extinction Event
(Wignall, 2009) so we will be facing total extinction unless we
sharply reduce our carbon dioxide emissions by a large amount (more
than 90%) and the existing methane content of the atmosphere by more
than 60%.
Gulf
Stream Destabilizing Arctic Methane Hydrates
The
hot Atlantic water destabilizing the methane hydrates in the Eurasian
Basin, Laptev Sea and the rest of the Arctic Ocean has its origin in
the Gulf Stream, which is heated by pollution clouds pouring
eastwards off the coasts of Canada and the United States, the main
pollution culprits which produce the largest and most intense region
of oceanic evaporation on Earth (Figure 8). Although the mean speed
of the Gulf Stream is 6.4 km/hour (1.78 metres/second), the much
wider North Atlantic Drift, which is its NE extension, flows at about
0.51 metres/second (3.5 times slower) while the West Spitzbergen
(Svalbard) (Gulf Stream Branch) current flows at about 0.35
metres/second (5 times slower)(Figures 24 and 25) (Boyd and Dasaro,
1994; Aagaard et al.1987, Light and Solana 2002 a,b).
The
West Spitzbergen Current has a total depth range of 5 to 500 metres
and the hot (> 2oC) core region of this current at 300 metres
depth moves along the entire continental slope region of the Eurasian
Basin formed of unstable methane hydrates (Figure 26 and 27). This
hot current then runs aground at the junction of the Eurasian Basin
and the Laptev Sea in a region where there is a large zone of methane
hydrate accumulations destabilizing them (Figure 26, Light and Solana
2002; Light 2011, 2012). The methane hydrates occur at the point
where the shelf edge swings westward and is intersected by the Gakkel
Ridge (Figure 28). The eastern shallower (300 metres deep) Yermack
branch of the Gulf Stream flows into the Baltic Sea and then makes
its way to the Laptev Sea flowing above the West Spitzbergen Current
there to form an extensive zone of shallower methane hydrate
destabilization there (Figure 25)(Bourke et al 1988; Manley 1995).
Consequently it will take some time (2 to 6 months) for the summer -
heated Gulf Stream waters to reach the Laptev Sea. In addition,
because the Gulf Stream does a closed circuit in the Tropical
Atlantic passing close to West Africa (Canary Current) and returning
back to the Gulf along the hurricane tracks, it is able to
continuously feed hot water into the North Atlantic Drift over a very
long time period (Figure 24). This explains why methane has been
continuously boiling off the subsea methane hydrates from the
Eurasian Basin and Laptev Sea during September to November this year
and will continue to be emitted past January 2014 (Figures 10 and
11).
What
we have got to do is eliminate as much of the atmospheric methane by
whatever means we are able to devise, to bring its concentration down
to about 700 ppb (Table 3) . This level will eliminate much of the
methane delayed temperature anomaly and give the massive industrial
nations a little leaway to get their houses in order. All the
scientific expenditure and ingenuity of the major industrial nations
should be engaged in developing methods of breaking down atmospheric
methane without burning it. Methods of increasing the tropospheric
and stratospheric hydroxyl concentrations and using radio - laser
systems such as the Alamo - Lucy projects and their applications to
HAARP must be developed and tested with the utmost urgency, as should
local methods of converting carbon dioxide and methane via catalysts
into other products (See Sam Carana's Arctic-news blog and the Alamo
and Lucy projects). We have to get rid of this methane monster before
it devours us all. If we fail to reduce the fast growing methane
content of the atmosphere in the next few decades we are going to go
the same way as the dinosaurs.
Modified
Lucy Project to Generate Hydroxyls at the Sea Surface Using Beams of
Polarized 13.56 MHZ Radio Transmissions
The
Lucy and Alamo (HAARP) projects were designed to break down
atmospheric methane using radio - laser transmissions (Light and
Carana 2013).
A
modified version of the Lucy Project is illustrated in Figure 6. In
this system three additional transmitters on three separate ships
will have their antenna placed slightly lower than the main 13.56 MHZ
methane destruction antennae. Recent experiments have shown that when
a test tube of seawater was illuminated by a polarized 13.56 MHZ
radio beam, that flammable gases (nascent hydrogen and hydroxyls)
were released at the top of the tube (iopscience.iop.org, 2013;
www.i-sis.org.uk/canWaterBurn.php,
2013). In the modified version of the Lucy Project, hydroxyls will be
generated by a polarized 13.56 MHZ beam intersecting the sea surface
over the region where a massive methane torch (plume) is entering the
atmosphere in order that the additional hydroxyl produced will react
with the rising methane breaking a large part of it down. In the
Arctic Ocean, the polarized 13.56 MHZ radio waves will decompose
atmospheric humidity, mist, fog, ocean spray and the surface of the
waves themselves into nascent hydrogen and hydroxyl.
The
distance to the edges of the methane torch on the surface of the
Arctic Ocean X in km will depend on the height h in metres that the
polarized 13.56 MHZ transmitting antenna is set at on the ship and
Table 5 shows the relationship between antenna height and distance to
horizon at sea (Table 4). The formula linking the two is:-
X
= Square root ((R+(h/1000))^2 - R^2)
Where:
X = distance to edge of methane torch in km
h
= height of polarized 13.56 MHZ antenna in metres
R
= Polar radius of the Earth (6356.755 km)
R
= Mean radius of the Earth (6371 km)
R
= Equatorial radius of the Earth (6378.14 km)
(Lide
and Frederickse, 1995)
The
angle Phi in degrees subtended by the polarized 13.56 MHZ beam needed
to intersect the entire diameter of the methane torch at the sea
surface is a function of the distance of the antenna from the edge of
the methane torch in km and the diameter of the methane torch in km .
The formula relating the two is:-
Theta
= 2Arcsin (d/(2*X))
Where:
X = distance to edge of methane torch in km
d
= diameter of the methane eruption torch in km
New
safe thorium energy generators have been invented that can replace
normal nuclear stations and can be made small enough to run a car for
100 years without refueling (industrytap.com, 2013; peswiki.com,
2013). This clean energy source can supply the electricity to run the
Lucy and HAARP transmission systems (Figures 6 and 7).
A
newly determined global atmospheric temperature gradient (Figure 1
and Table 5) indicates that the mean global atmospheric temperature
anomaly will reach 1.5oC in 15 years (2028.5) and 2oC in 20 years
(2033.4). Consequently we only have 15 years to get an efficient
methane destruction radio - laser system designed, tested and
installed (Lucy and Alamo (HAARP) Projects) before the accelerating
methane eruptions take us into uncontrollable runaway global warming.
This will give a leeway of 5 years before the critical 2oC
temperature anomaly will have been exceeded (Table 5) and we will be
looking at catastrophic storm systems, a fast rate of sea level rise
and coastal zone flooding with its disastrous effects on world
populations and global stability. An anomalous temperature of 4oC
will be reached by the atmosphere around 2043 which will end the
vegetation carbon sink, preventing plants from helping balance carbon
dioxide exhalation and this will further accelerate climatic change
(Table 5)(Friend, 2013).
Alamo
Project
Methane
is rising into the stratosphere and mesosphere where some of it is
being oxidised to produce larger quantities of noctilucent clouds
between 76 and 85 km altitude (Figures 15 -17). Noctilucent clouds
were originally confined to the southern polar regions, were then
seen north of Norway and are now occuring at much lower latitudes
over Colorado. Prof. James Russel of Hampton University argues that
the build up of methane in the atmosphere is the reason for the
increase in noctilucent clouds. Prof Russel says: "When methane
makes its way into the upper atmosphere it is oxidised by a complex
series of reactions to form water vapour. This extra water vapour is
then available to grow ice crystals for noctilucent clouds".
If
we succeed in breaking down the methane in the stratosphere and
mesosphere with the HAARP-IRIS (Ionospheric Research Instrument)
using the 13.56 MHZ methane destruction frequency, it could lead to
an increase in noctilucent cloud formation in a circular zone
directly above the HAARP transmitters which could be detected by
optical cameras or radar (Figure 7). Besides the elimination of the
high global warming potential methane, noctilucent clouds formed from
methane water condensing on meteorite dust and nano diamonds will
reflect the suns radiation back into space and this will also help to
counteract global warming. The HAARP-IRIS transmitters normal
frequency range is from 2.8 MHZ to 10 MHZ. If for example a 10 MHZ
carrier wave is modulated by a 3.56 MHZ signal, it will produce and
Upper Side frequency of 13.56 MHZ, the necessary methane destruction
frequency and a Lower Side Frequency of 6.44 MHZ (Penguin Dictionary
of Physics, 2000).
The
HAARP tests should be conducted in the summer when the stratospheric
temperatures are at the lowest in Alaska (140oK to 160oK) increasing
the chances of noctilucent cloud formation from the radio frequency
oxidised methane.
Arctic
Methane Permanent Storage
In
the Angels Proposal (see; Arctic-news.blogspot.com) subsea Arctic
methane is extracted, stored and sold as LNG for distribution as
fuel, but permanent storage underground is more preferable (Figure
22, Carana, 2013).
Prof.
Kenneth Yanda at the University of California - Irvine has shown that
methane can be stored in propane - methane hydrates that are stable
at temperatures of ca 15oC and low pressure (25 pounds per square
inch - 1.66 atmospheres) very close to the ambient temperature and
pressure conditions (Figure 22). Hydrates can be produced that
contain larger cages for other gases and smaller cages for methane
(Figures 22a - 22b, Carana, 2013). Methane can be converted into
propane and other gases with UV light and the final goal would be
long term storage of these gases in the form of hydrates in deep
waters such as those north of Alaska (Carana, 2013). Carbon dioxide
can also then be sequestered in the hydrates to remove it from the
atmosphere as the volume of carbon stored in worldwide hydrates is
huge (Figure 22c, Carana, 2013).
Unlike
carbon dioxide, methane is completely non-polar and reacts very
weakly with most materials. Three zeolite types (SBN, ZON and FER)
have been found to absorbe methane at high to moderate rates
(Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory(LLNL) and UC Berkley, 2013)
and may be used in treating coal-mine ventilation air (see
arctic-news.blogspot.com.es)(Figure 22d, Carana 2013).
Symbiotic
Bacteria Destroying Methane in the Arctic Ocean
Two
symbiotic methane eating microbes in cold ocean waters excrete carbon
dioxide and need an enzyme that requires tungsten to operate (Glass,
2013). They are a sulfate utilizing deltaproteobacteria and an
anaerobic methanotrophic archea (Glass, 2013) The carbon dioxide
released by the bacteria reacts with minerals in the water to form
calcium carbonate (Glass 2013). If these bacteria and tungsten
enzymes were introduced in great quantities into the Arctic Ocean
they could eliminate the methane plumes before they entered the
atmosphere giving humanity time to destroy the existing atmospheric
methane accumulations.
Conclusions
The
Earth is a giant convecting planet, the underlying molten magma being
heated by deep seated radioactivity and the oceans and atmosphere are
its cooling radiator which allows the Earth the facility to vent this
heat into open space (Windley, 1984; Allen and Allen, 1990). Mother
Earth has carefully held the atmospheric temperature within a stable
range necessary for oceans to exist for at least 4 billion years and
nurtured the earliest bacteria to evolve into today's space faring
humans (Calder, 1983).
The
fouling up of the Earth's cooling radiator from Human emissions of
greenhouse gases derived from fossil fuels will be counteracted by
Mother Earth in her characteristic fashion by emitting vast volumes
of deadly methane into the atmosphere from the Arctic regions. This
will lead to the total extermination of all harmful biological
species that produce greenhouse gases in the same way that Mother
Earth did during the Permian and other extinction extinction events.
In this case however we have totally tipped the balance with our
extreme carbon dioxide and methane emissions so that there will be no
chance of recovery for the Earth in this time frame, because the
methane release will cause the oceans to begin boiling off between
115oC and 120oC (Severson, 2013) in 2080 and the Earth's atmosphere
will have reached temperatures equivalent to those on Venus by 2096
(460oC to 467oC)(Wales, 2013; Moon Phases, 2013).
Mankind's
greed for fossil fuels will have completely destroyed a magnificent
beautiful blue planet and converted its atmosphere into a barren,
stiflingly hot , carbon dioxide rich haze. The earth will have moved
permanently out of the magical zone (Circumstellar habitable zone,
Goldilocks zone) where life (some of it probably highly intelligent)
also exists elsewhere in the myriad of other solar systems that are
located within the far reaches of our Universe.
The
power, prestige and massive economy of the United States has been
built on cheap and abundant fossil fuels and Canada is now trying to
do the same. The present end of the financial crisis and recovery of
the U.S. economy will take us down the same fossil fuel driven road
to catastrophe that the U.S. has followed before. Unless the United
States, Canada reduce their extreme carbon footprints (per unit
population)(Figures 29 and 30), they will end up being found guilty
of ecocide and genocide as the number of countries destroyed by the
catastrophic weather systems continues to increase.
The
United States and Canada with their expanding economies and their
growing frenetic extraction of fossil fuels, using the most
environmentally destructive methods possible (fracking and shale oil)
as well as the population's total addiction to inefficient gas
transport is leading our planet into suicide. We are like maniacal
lemmings leaping to their deaths over a global warming cliff. What a
final and futile legacy it will be for the leader of the free world
to be remembered only in the log of some passing alien ship recording
the loss of the Earth’s atmosphere and hydrosphere after 2080 due
to human greed and absolute energy ineptitude.
The
U.S. Government and Canada must ban all environmentally destructive
methods of fossil fuel extraction such as fracking, extracting shale
oil and coal and widespread construction of the now found to be
faulty hydrocarbon pipeline systems. All Federal Government subsidies
to fossil fuel corporations, for fossil fuel discovery and extraction
must be immediately eliminated and the money spent solely on
renewable energy development which will provide many jobs to the
unemployed. All long and short range (high consumption) fossil fuel
transport must be electrified and where the range is too large,
electrical trains must be used instead of trucks for transport. All
the major work for this conversion and railway construction can
provide a new and growing set of jobs for the unemployed. Nuclear
power stations must continue to be used and should be converted to
the safe thorium energy system until the transition is complete.
The
U.S. has to put itself on a war footing, recall its entire military
forces and set them to work on the massive change over to renewable
energy that the country needs to undertake, if it wishes to survive
the fast approaching catastrophe. The enemy now is Mother Nature who
has infinite power at her disposal and intends to take no prisoners
in this very short, absolutely brutal, 30 to 40 year war she has
begun. I cannot emphasise more, how serious humanity’s predicament
is and what we should try to do to prevent our certain final
destruction and extinction in the next 30 to 40 years if we continue
down the present path we are following .
Acknowledgements
My
greatest thanks go to Sam Carana and Harold Hensel for their tireless
work in continuously editing publishing and speaking about the latest
available information on the fast growing Arctic methane threat to an
ever expanding audience. Their work has been unceasing and of
outstanding value in these very dangerous times. Let us hope and pray
that their efforts bear fruit and that we and our children are able
to come out of this in one piece.
References
Generating
Hydroxyls from Water by Beaming Polarized 13.56 MHZ Radio Waves
Thorium
Reactors and Car Engines
General
References
Abu-Nasr
D., 1998. World's weather losses will set record this year. Austin
American Satesman, saturday, november 28, A7
Allen,
P.A., and Allen, J.R. 1990. Basin Analysis, Principles and
Applications. Blackwell, Oxford, 451 pp.
Anderson
L.I., Peterson K.P. and Parisi, W.A., 1984. "Enhanced production
from a Slightly Geopressured Water-Drive Gas Condensate Field".
SPE/DOE/GRI 12866. Paper presented at the Unconventional Gas Recovery
Symposium, Pittsburgh, P.A., May 13 - 15, 1984.
Anitei
S. 2007. How is the Ozone layer menaced? The Daily Climate. www.
Daily Climate.org.
Arctic
Methane Emergency Group (AMEG), 2012
Altonn
H. 2000. Weird hunt for U.H. team. The biggest oddest place in the
upper ocean could yield greenhouse gas clue. Star-belletin.com
Ashton,
A. 2001. Harmonograph. A visual guide to the mathematics of music.
Wooden Books, Glastonbury. 58 pp.
Avetisov
G.P. 2008. Seismic Arctic Earthquakes-Geophysical Center. Russian
Academy of Sciences-NGDC-NOAA.
Barnola
et al. 1987. Nature, 329. 408-4
Boudon
V. 2012. Spectroscopy of Methane. Molecular Spectroscopy and
Applications. Department of Optics and Matter-Radiation Interaction.
Institut Carnat de Bourgogne (ICB). UMR5209 CNRS-Universite de
Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Box
J. and Decker D. 2012. Greenland Ice Sheet Reflectivity , July 2000 –
2011, 2012 days 1 – 23. NASA MOD1OA1 data processed by Jason Bird
and David Decker. Byrd Polar Research Centre. Projection in red added
by Sam Carana, 2012.
Brown
J., Ferrians O. J., Heginbottom, J.A., and Melnikov, E.S., 1997.
Circum - Arctic map of the permafrost and ground - ice
conditions.International Permafrost Association. United Sates
Geological Survey. Scale 1:10 000 000, 1 sheet.
Calder,
N. 1984. Timescale - An Atlas of the Fourth Dimension. Chatto and
Windus, London, 288 pp.
Callesthen
C. 2001. Giant submarine landslides off continetal margins and
stability of hydrocarbon clathrate hydrates - A laboratory study.
U.S.G.S.
Campbell
I.D., Campbell C., Apps M.J., Rutter N.W., Bush A. B. G., 1998. Late
Holocene - 1500 yr climatic periodicities and their implcations.
geology 26,5. p. 471 - 473
Carana,
S. 2011a. Runaway Warming 2011. Geo-engineering blog
Carana,
S. 2011b. Runaway global warming 2011. Knol
Carana,
S. 2011g. Runaway Global Warming. In: Climate Change the Next
Generation.
Carana,
S. 2012. Striking increase of methane in the Arctic. In: Arctic News
Carana
S., 2012. Record levels of greenhouse gases in the Arctic. Arctic
News. Wednesday, May 2, 2012.
Carana
S., 2012. The accumulating impact of methane releases in the Arctic
and how much time there is left to act.
Carana
S., 2012. How much time is there left to act? Abrupt release of 1 Gt
of methane.
Carana
S., 2013. Quantifying Arctic Methane.
Carana
S., 2013. Methane - hydrates.
Carana
S., 2013. Methane up to 2241 ppb at 742 mb on January 23, 2013. In:
Carana S., 2013, Dramatic increase in methane in the Arctic in
January 2013.
Carana
S., 2013. Global warming, accelerated warming in the Arctic and
runaway global warming. - How much will temperatures rise?.
Carana
S., 2011b. Light, M.P.R. and Carana, S. 2011c. Knol - A unit of
Knowledge - Methane linked to seismic activity in the Arctic.
Chao,
B.F., Yu, Y.H., Li, Y.S., 2008. Impact of Artificial Reservoir Water
Impoundment on Global Sea Level. Science, v. 320, p. 212 – 214.
Chesney
T.P., Lewis R.C., and Trice, 1982. "Secondary Gas Recovery from
a Moderately Strong Water Drive reservoir. A Case History. "Journal
of Petroleum Technology. September 1982.
Church
J.A., White N.J., Thorkild A., Wilson W.S., Woodworth, .L. Domingues
C.M., Hunter J.R., Lambeck K., 2008. Understanding global sea levels:
past, present and future. Special Feature. Original Article. Sustain
Sci. V.3, pp. 9 - 22.
Clague
D.A., Maher N., and Paull C.K., 2001. High resolution multibeam
survey of Hydrate ridge offshore Oregon. In: Natural Gas Hydrates.
Occurence, distribution and detection. C.K. Paul and W.P. Dillon
(Eds.) Geophysical Monograph 124. American Geophysical Union, p. 297
- 303.
ClimateChange
2012. Climate Change; The Next Generation
Collett
T.S., 1993. Natural gas hydrates of the Prudoe Bay and Kuparak River
area, North Slope, Alaska. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists Bulletin, 77, p. 793 - 812.
Collett
T.S., 1995. Gas Hydrate Resources of the United States. In Gautier
D.L. et al. eds. National assessment of United States oil and gas
resources on CD-ROM. U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series 30.
Collett
T.S. and Ladd J., 1999. Detection of gas hydrate with down hole logs
and assessment of gas hydrate concentrations (saturations) and gas
volumes on the Blake Ridge with electrical resistivity log data - Leg
164 SR, in press.
Connor
S., 2011. Shock as retreat of Arctic sea ice releases deadly
greenhouse gas. Russian research team astonished after finding
fountains of methane bubbling to the surface. The Independent.
Cornell
C.B., 2008. "CNG fuel almost free in some parts of the country".
Natural gas Cars.
Couper
A.D., 1983. The Times. Atlas of the Oceans. Van Nostrand Reinold, New
York, 272 pp.
CCSP
2008. Abrupt Climate Change. A report by the U.S. Climate Change
Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change (Clarke P.U.,
and Weaver A.J. (coordinating lead authors), Brook F., Cook E.R.,
Delworth T.L. and Steffen K., (chapter lead authors), U.S. Geological
Survey, Reston, VA, 459 pp.
Csanady
G.T., 2001. Air - Sea Interaction. Laws and Mechanisms. Cambridge
University Press. Cambridge, 236 pp.
Daly
J.L., 1995. The top of the world. Is the North pole turning to water?
http://www.microtech.com.au/daly/polar.arctic.htm
Dessus,
B., and Laponche B., Herve le Treut, 2008. Global Warming: The
Significance of Methane bd-bl-hlt January 2008.
D'Hondt
S., Rutherford S., Spivack A.J., 2002. Metabolic activity of
subsurface life in deep-sea sediments. Science 295, pp. 2067 - 2070.
Dickens
G.R., Paull C.K., Wallace P. et al., 1997. Direct measurement of in
situ methane quantities in a large gas - hydrate reservoir - Nature,
385, p. 426 - 428.
Dillon
W.P. and Max M.D., 2000. Oceanic gas hydrate In: M.D. Max (Ed.)
Natural gas hydrate in ocean and permafrost environments. Elsevier,
Amsterdam. 61 - 76.
Dillon
W.P., Nealon J.W., Taylor M.H., Lee M.W., Drury R.M., Anton C.H.,
2001. Seafloor collapse and methane venting associated with gas
hydrate on the Blake Ridge - cause and implications to sea floor
stability and to methane release. In: Drummond J. 1986. Natural
Energy Resources Map of the Circum Pacific region. Circum - Pacific
Council for Energy and Mineral resources. AAPG, Tulsa. Scale 1:10 000
000.
Dobrynin
V.M., Korotajev YuP. and Plyuschev D.V., 1981. gas hydrates - a
possible energy resource. In: Meyer R.F., Olsen J.C., eds. Long -
term Energy Resources, Boston, Pitman, p. 727 - 729.
Drummond
J. 1984. Geodynamic Map of the Circum - Pacific Region. Circum -
Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral resources. AAPG, Tulsa. Scale
1 :10 000 000.
Duren
T., Sarkisov L., Yaght O.M., Snurr R.Q., 2004. design and New
Material for Methane Storage. Langmuir 20(7) 2689 -9.
Edwards,
M.H., Kurras G.J., Toltstoy, M., Bohnenstiehl, D.R., Coakley, B.J.,
Cochran, J.R., 2001. Evidence of recent volcanic activity on the
ultraslow - spreading Gakkel Ridge. Letters to nature. Nature 409,
no. 6822 808 - 812.
Ehret
G. 2010. MERLIN: French - German climate satellite to be launched in
2014. Deutches Zentrum für Luft - und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für
Physik der Atmosphäre, Lidar Department.
Engineering
Toolbox, 2011. Gases – Specific Gravities.
EPA
(1999). Global Warming Site Reports. Presentations - Climate Change
and Impacts.
http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming/reports/slides/cc&i/a-intro.html
Ewing
T.E., Light M.P.R., and Tyler N., 1984. Thermal and diagenetic
history of the Pleasant Bayou - Chocolate Bayou area, Brazoria
County, Texas. Gulf Coast Association of geological Societies
Transactions, v. 34, p. 341 - 348.
Francis,
J., A., 2013. Extreme Weather and Global Warming. Rutgers University.
Friend,
A., 2013. 4 degree temperature rise will end vegetation ' carbon
sink'.
FT.com
2011. Shell's floating LNG Plant given green light.
Glass
J., 2013. Methane-Eating Microbes Need Trace Metal. School of Earth
and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
Gas
Hydrates, Occurence, distribution and detection. C.K. Paul and W.P.
dillon (Eds.) Geophysical Monograph 124. American Geophysical Union.
p. 211 - 233.
Gazprom
2011. Gazprom Platform Heading North. The Moscow Times 19th August
2011.
Ginsburg
G.D. and Soloviev V.A., 1995. Submarine gas hydrate estimation;
theoretical and empirical approaches - 27th Offshore Technology
Conference, Houston, texas, p. 513 - 518.
Ginsburg
G.D., and Soloviev V.A., 1994. Submarine Gas hydrates
VNIIOkeangeologia, St Petersburg, 216 p.
Gill
A.E. 1982. Atmosphere - Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press. san Diego,
662 pp.
Gille
S.T., 2002. Warming of the Southern Ocean since the 1950's Science,
295, p. 1275 - 1277. http://www.sciencemag.org
Gleick
P., 2013. "You are here". Perspective on 400 ppm CO2 in the
Atmosphere.
http://scienceblogs.com/significantfigures/index.php/2013/12/04/you-are-here-perspective-on-400-ppm-co2-in-the-atmosphere
Image:
Globell
C., Macdonald R.W., Smith J.N., Beaudin 2001, Atlantic water flow
pathways revealed by lead contamination in Arctic Basin sediments.
Science, 293, p. 1301 - 1304.
Gornitz
V and Fung I., 1994. Potential distribution od methane hydrates in
the World's Oceans - Global Biochem Cycles, 8. p. 335 - 347.
Gramberg
I.S., Verba V.V., Verba M.L., Kos'ko' M.K., 1999. Sediemntary Cover
Thickness Map - Sedientary Basins in the Arctic. In: Polarfoeschung
69, Tessensohn F., Roland N.W. (eds.) ICAMIII. III International
Conference on Arctic Margins, Celle (Germany) 12 - 16 October, 1998:
pp 243 - 249.
Grant
- Gross M., 1982. Oceanography: A view of the Earth, 3rd ed.,
Prentice - hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Fig. 6.8.
Grants
A., and Dinter D.A., 1980. Constraints of geologic processes on
western Beaufort sea oil developments. Oil and Gas Journal. 78 (18),
304 - 319.
Guffanti
M., and Nathenson M., 1980. Preliminary map of temperature gradients
in the conterminous Unites States: Geothermal Resources Council
Transactions, V. 4, p. 53 - 56.
Halbouty
M.T., 2001. Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade, 1990 - 2000. An
Introduction.
http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/halbouty03/index.htm
Hansen
J.E. 2011. Giss Surface Temperature Analysis, NASA. Goddard Institute
for Space Physics;
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/egibin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2001&month_last=08&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=02&year1=2009&year2=2009&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=1200&pol=pol
Hargraves,
2012. Altitudes of World Cities. Hargraves Advanced Fluidic
Solutions.
Harrison
J.C., St-Onge M.R., Petrov O., Streinikov S., Lopatin B., Wilson F.,
Tella S., Paul D., Lyndts T., Shokalsky S., Hults C., Bergman S.,
Jepsen H.F., and Solli A., 2008. Geological Map of the Arctic,
geological Survey of Canada, Open File 5816, Scale 1:1000 000, 5
Sheets.
Harvey
L.D., and Huang Z., 1995. Evaluation of the potential impact of
methane clathrate destabilization on future global warming. J.G.R.,
v. 100, No D2, pp 2905 - 2926.
Heezen
B.C. and Ewing M. 1963. The mid - ocean ridge, in: The Sea III, M.N.
Hill (ed.), Interscience, New York, 388 - 410.
Heicklen,
J. 1976. Atmospheric Chemistry. Academic Press, New York, 406 pp.
Hillen,
M.H., Jonkman, S.N., Kanning, W., Kok, M., Geldenhuys M., Vrijling
J.K. and Stive, M.J.F., 2010.
Coastal
Defence Cost Estimates Case Study of the Netherlands, New Orleans and
Vietnam. The Netherlands, TU Delft. Available from:
http:/tiny.cc/wikh
Holmes
A., 1964. Principles of Physical Geology. New Edn. Nelson, London,
1260 pp.
Holbrook
2001. Seismic studies of the Blake Ridge. Implications for hydrate
distribution, methane expulsion and free gas dynamics. In: Natural
Gas Hydrates. Hovland M., and Gudmestad, O.T., Potential Influence of
Gas Hydrates on Seabed Installations. C.K. Paull and W.P. Dillon
(Eds.), Natural Gas Hydrates: Occurence, Distribution and Detection.
Geophysical Monograph 124, pp. 307 - 315.
Holbrook
W., Hoskins H., Wood W., et al. 1996. Methane hydrate and free gas on
the Blake Ridge from vertical seismic profiling - Science, 273, p.
1840 - 1843.
Holtz
M.H., nance P.K., and Finley R.J., 1998. Reduction of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions through Underground CO2 Sequestration in texas Oil &
gas Reservoirs. Final Contract Report Prepared for the Electric Power
Research Institute through U.S. Department of Energy under contract
no. W04603-04, December, Bureau of economic geology, the University
of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 84 p.,
http://www.beg.utexas.edu/environqlty/co201.htm
IPPC
2001. Working Group 1. The Scientific Basis, 4.1.1. Sources of
Greenhouse Gases. IPCC, TAR 2001.
IPPC
2001. Atmosphere, chemistry and Greenhouse Gases, executive Summary.
IPCC, TAR 04 (2001).
IPCC
Fourth Assessment Report on Climate Change 2007 - temperature rise
projections
Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007. Working Group 1. The Physical
Science Basis, Table 2.14. Climate Change 2007.
Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007. Working Group 1. The Physical
Science Basis, FAQ 10.3. Climate Change 2007.
Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2013. AR5 Working Group 1,
Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1992a. Climate Change. The IPCC
Scientific Assessment (Edited by J. J. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins and J.
J. Ephraums). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. U.K.
Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1992b. Climate Change in 1992. The
Supplementary report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (Edited by J.
J. Houghton, B. A. Callander and S. K. Varney). Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge. U.K.
Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007a. Fourth Assessment Report on
Climate Change 2007. FAO 3.1, Figure 1, WG1, Chapter 3, p. 253.
Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007b. Synthesis Report
Lide.
D.R. and Frederikse H.P.R., 1995. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and
Physics. 75th Edition, CRC Press, London. pp. 1-1 - 1-33.
Light
M.P.R. 2011a. Use of beamed interfering radio frequency transmissions
to decompose Arctic atmospheric methane clouds. Edited by Sam Carana.
Light
M.P.R. 2011c. Stratospheric methane global warming veil. Edited by
Sam Carana. In: Arctic News.
Light
M.P.R., 2012a. Global exctinction within one human lifetime as a
result of a spreading atmospheric methane heatwave and surface
firestorm. Edited by Sam Carana. In Arctic News.
Light
M.P.R., 2012b. How much time is there left to act, before methane
hydrate releases will lead to human extinction? Edited by Sam Carana.
In: Geo-Engineering.
Light
M.P.R. 2012c. Angels Proposal - A Proposal for the Prevention of
Arctic Methane Induced Catastrophic Global Climate Change by
Extraction of Methane from beneath the Permafrost/Arctic Methane
Hydrates and its Storage and Sale as a Subsidized "Green Gas"
Energy Source. LGS. 49 pp. In: Arctic News.
Light
M.P.R. and Carana, S., 2011. Methane linked to seismic activity in
the Arctic. Edited by Sam Carana. In: Arctic News.
Light
M.P.R. and Solana C., 2002a. Arctic methane hydrates - Mapping a
potential greenhouse gas hazard. Abstract and Poster, EGS, Nice.
Light,
M.P.R. and Solana, C. , 2002b- Arctic Methane Hydrates: A Potential
Greenhouse Gas Hazard
Lopatin,
N.V. 1971. Temperature and geologic time as factors in coalification
(in Russian). Akad. Nauk SSSR. Izvestiya. Seriya Geologicheskaya, 3,
pp.95 - 106.
Masters.
J. 2009. Top Climate Story of 2008. Arctic Sea Ice Loss. Dr Jeff
Masters Wunderblog.
Moon
Phases 2013. Temperature on Venus in Moon Phases - learn all about
the moon.
Nassar
R., Bernath P.F., Boone C.D., Manney G.L., McLeod S.D., Rinsland
C.P., Skelton R., Walker K.A., 2005. Stratospheric abundances of
water and methane based on ACE-FTS measurements. Geophysical Research
Letters, Vol. 32, LI5504, 5 pp.
NASA
global temperature data
Naumer
T. 2012. Triggering permafrost meltdown is closer than we think.
Neven,
2011. Arctic Sea Ice Blog. Interesting News and Data;
NOAA
2013. Global Analysis, October 2013. National Climate Data Center.
National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration.
NOAA
2011a. Huge sudden atmospheric methane spike Arctic Svalbard (north
of - Norway)
NOAA
2011b. Huge sudden methane spike recorded at Barrow (BRW), Alaska,
United States. Generated ESRL/GMO – 2011. December 14-17-21 pm
NOAA
2006. Global distribution of atmospheric methane adapted by Sam
Carana.
NSIDC,
2011a. The Polar Vortex. National Snow and Ice Data Center.
Olivier
C.P. 1942. Long Enduring Meteor Trains. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 35,
93.
Olivier
C.P. 1948. Long Enduring Meteor Trains. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 91,
315 (Second paper).
Oskin
B., Twice as much methane escapingArctic seafloor.
Parry,
M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P. and Co-authors, 2007. Impacts,
Adaption and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the
Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der
Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
UK, pp. 23 – 78.
Pearce
F., Arctic storms speed up release of methane plumes.
Pravettoni
R. 2009. WWF Arctic Feedbacks Report. UNEP.GRID Arendal.
Science
Daily, 2011. Record Depletion of Arctic Ozone Layer Causing Increased
UV Radiation in Scandinavia.
Scientific
American, 2012. Hurricane Sandy: An Unprecidented Disaster.
Semiletov,
I. 2011. Quoted from Itar-Tass. Heavy methane emissions found in the
Arctic Eastern Sector. Itar-Tass. September 26, 2011.
Semiletov,
I. et al. 2012. Arctic Ocean with predicted deposits of CH4 hydrates
shown in blue. On carbon transport and fate in the East Siberian
Arctic land - shelf - atmosphere system.
Semiletov,
I. et al. 2012. On carbon transport and fate in the East Siberian
Arctic land-shelf-atmosphere system.
Semiletov
et al. 2012. First drlling subsea permafrost in the southeastern
Laptev Sea, East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Results and challenges.
Severson
G. 2013. What is the boiling point of the ocean?
Shakova
N., 2013. A thawing ocean floor pours methane into the atmosphere and
it's only getting worse. PRI. Science, Tech and Environment.
Shakova
N., Semiletov I., Leifer I., Sergienko V., Salyuk A., Kosmach D.,
Chernykh D., Stubbs C., Nicolsky D., Tumskoy V., Gustafsson O., 2007.
Shakova
N., Semiletov, I., Salyuk, A., and Kosmach, D., 2008. Anomalies of
methane in the atmosphere over the East Siberian Shelf. Is there any
sign of methane leakage from shallow shelf hydrates? EGU General
Assembly 2008. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10, EGU2008-A-01526
Shakova,
N. and Semiletov, I., 2010a. Methane release from the East Siberian
Shelf and the potential for abrupt climate change. Presentation in
November 30, 2010.
Shakova
N., Semiletov, I., Leifer, I., Salyuk, A., Rekant, P., and Kosmach,
D. 2010b. Geochemical and geophysical evidence of methane release
over the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Journal Geophys. Research 115,
C08007
Shakova,
N., Semiletov, I., Salyuk, A., Yusupov, V., Kosmach, D., and
Gustafsson, O., 2010c. Extensive methane venting to the atmosphere
from sediments of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Science.
Shakun
et al. 2012.
Shiryaev,
AA., Lakoubovskii, N., Grambole D. and Dubrovinskaia, N. 2006.
Spectroscopic study of defects and inclusions in bulk poly- and
nanocrystalline diamond aggregates. Journal of Physics. Condensed
Matter 18, No 40, L493-L501.
Sternowski,
R.H. 2012. Lecture 7. Softronics Ltd.
Stroeve,
J.E., Serreze, M.C., Holland, M.M., Kay, J.E., Malanik, J., and
Barret, 2012. The Arctics rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: a research
synthesis. Clim. Change. 110, (4.- Mar), p. 1005 - 1027.
Taraborelli
et al. 2012. Global hydroxyl levels day and night. in Hydroxyl
radical buffered by isoprene oxidation over tropical forests.
Tharp.
M., and Frankel, H., 1986. In: Natural History, October 1986. North
American Museum of Natural History, p. 1 – 6.
The
Penguin Dictionary of Physics 2000. 3rd Edition., Market House Books
Ltd., Penguin Books, London. pp. 504.
Tschudi,
M.A., Stroeve, D.K., Perovich, D.K., and Maslanik, J.A., 2012. Arctic
Sea Ice Melt Pond Coverage Derived from Modis and from High
Resolution Satellite Imagery. Remote Sensing of the Environment.
NSIDC.
Windley
B.F. 1984. The Evolving Continents. Second Edition. John Wiley &
Sons. 399 pp.
Wofsy,
S.C. et al. 2009. (image: HIPPO-1 flight along the date line, January
2009) HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): fine-grained,
global-scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases
and aerosols Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2011) 369, 2073–2086
doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0313
Wales
J. 2012. Wikipedia
-
Carbon Dioxide
-
Climate of the Arctic
-
Density of Air
-
Global Warming
-
Methane
-
Natural Gas
-
Enthalpy of Fusion
-
Jason-1
-
Current Sea Level Rise
-
Venus
Wignall
P.B., 2011. Earth Science: Lethal Volcanism. Nature 477, pp. 285 -
286
Wignall,
P. 2009. Miracle Planet; Episode 4, Part 2. Coproduced by NHK (Japan)
and the National Film Board of Canada (NFB).
Yurganov
L. 2013. IASI methane levels March 1-10, 2013 against NSIDC sea ice
concentration map, March 12, 2013 in: Carana S. 2013. Record methane
in Arctic early March 2013.
Yurganov,
L., 2012a. Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) data from NASA's Aqua
Satellite. Index of pub/yurganov/methane/MAPS/
Yurganov,
L., 2012b. Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) data from NASA's Aqua
Satellite.
Zhang
J. and Rothrock D.A. 2012. Arctic Sea Ice Volume Anomaly, Version 2.
Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of
Washington.
Zhang
J. and Rothrock D.A. 2003. Modelling global sea ice with a thickness
and enthalpy distribution model in generalized curvilinear
co-ordinates.
FIGURES
AND TABLES
Is Eric "Fucking" Schmidt not the new Edward Bernays?
ReplyDeletehttp://blennylips.com/IsEricSchmidtnotthenewEdwardBernays.html
The 2013 Australian above - average temperatures set a record of ... temperaturegun.blogspot.com
ReplyDelete