Syria
crisis: France is no longer shoulder-to-shoulder with US
‘Cheese-eating
surrender monkeys’ again risk American wrath as François Hollande
steps back from air strikes
29
August, 2013
François
Hollande – who has to date found himself in the unusual position
for a French president of being the staunchest backer of proposed
American military action – appeared today to back away from
immediate air strikes against Syria by talking of the importance of a
“political solution” to the crisis.
After
a meeting at the Elysée Palace with Ahmad al-Jarba, the leader of
the Western-backed opposition group Syrian National Coalition, Mr
Hollande also warned that peace would be impossible if the
international community failed to “put an end” to “the
escalation of violence” such as last week’s alleged use of
chemical weapons against civilians in a Damascus suburb.
Overall,
however, Mr Hollande’s remarks were more cautious than his previous
statement on Tuesday when he said that France was “ready to punish
those who took the iniquitous decision to gas innocent people”. It
appears that the President has been obliged to touch the brake to
stay in line with hesitations in the United States and with the
parliamentary procedure started in the UK.
“Everything
must be done to find a political solution but it will not arrive
unless the Coalition is capable of acting as an alternative
(government),” he said. “We will not get there unless the
international community puts an end to this escalation of violence of
which this chemical massacre is only one example.”
His
remarks appeared to disappoint Mr Jarba, who called for “a punitive
strike against the regime”.
France,
like Britain, is said to have told the United States that it is ready
to play an auxiliary role in any missiles or air strikes against
Syria. French officials said that Mr Hollande is personally convinced
that the gas attack near Damascus was carried out by the Assad
regime.
The
French defence minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said today that the armed
forces were ready to “respond to the requests and the decisions of
the President once he reaches that point”. A French anti-aircraft
frigate moved into the eastern Mediterranean in recent days.
President
Hollande has the power to engage French forces without parliamentary
approval so long as the action does not last longer than four months.
Timing is, however, critical. Diplomats suggest that Mr Hollande
would be reluctant to act with the US alone. Any western intervention
may, therefore, have to wait until the British parliamentary
procedure is completed.
French
public opinion is heavily weighted against any military action in
Syria – even one approved by the United Nations Security Council.
Almost all senior political figures on the left and the right have
approved Mr Hollande’s hints that France is ready to act with the
US and the UK. The only exception is the former centre-right Prime
Minister, Dominique de Villepin, who led France’s opposition to the
Anglo-American invasion of Iraq in 2003.
The
French position is markedly different to that of 10 years ago when
the government of President Jacques Chirac was derided by certain
figures for its opposition to the Iraq invasion. The then US Defence
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld accused France of representing “old
Europe” and certain elements of the American press dismissed French
officials as “cheese-eating surrender monkeys”.
According
to an IFOP poll, 59 per cent of French voters oppose French
involvement in an air-strike in Syria. The poll found that UN action
would be supported by 55 per cent of French people – so long as the
French military does not take part.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.