Thousands
of supporters and opponents of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi are
battling for control of Cairo’s Tahrir Square, the epicenter of the
recent revolution. Over one hundred protesters are reported injured
in the violence
RT,
12
October, 2012
Supporters
and opponents of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi are battling for
control of Cairo’s Tahrir Square, the epicenter of the recent
revolution. Over one hundred protesters have been reported injured in
the violence.
Protesters
hurled rocks and bottles at each other, fists flew and gunshots were
heard during the melee in downtown Cairo on Friday. The ongoing
conflict is the first major street fight between liberals and
Islamists since Morsi's election in June.
Bel
Trew, a Cairo-based journalist, told RT about the chaotic scene
unfolding on Tahrir, saying she had “personally
witnessed rock throwing, several very heavy head injuries, Molotov
[cocktail] throwing;
we have heard gunshots, though I can’t confirm that myself as I
wasn’t able to see.”
She
also said there were small fires by a museum adjacent to the square
caused by petrol bombs and fireworks. Trew believes the violence is
unlikely to end soon, as “there
has been no police presence whatsoever, even though in Morsi’s
100-day plan, he did say that he would up security in the country and
reassure people that they wouldn’t see scenes like this.”
The
Health Ministry said 110 people had sustained light to moderate
injuries, state media reported.
Mounira
Public Hospital chief Muhammad Shawky said earlier in the afternoon
that his hospital had received at least ten injured protesters, the
Egypt Independent reports. One man was hospitalized after receiving a
serious eye injury, while nine others were treated for minor wounds
and later released. Since then, the number reported injured has
continued to increase without any signs of abating.
Eyewitnesses
said many of the injured had been pelted with rocks.
Egyptian protesters hold a national flag as they walk past a burning bus during clashes in Cairo on October 12, 2012 (AFP Photo / Str)
Some
2,000 people poured onto the square on Friday after tensions erupted
between pro- and anti-Morsi forces when a court acquitted Mubarak-era
officials accused of ordering camels to charge against protesters
during last year’s uprising.
The
February 2011 incident, known as the "Camel Battle," left
nearly a dozen people dead. It was one of the bloodiest incidents in
the 2011 revolution that toppled the Mubarak regime.
The
so-called "Judgement Day” protest on the square had originally
been organized by left-leaning activists hoping to draw attention to
their disaffection with President Morsi and the Constituent Assembly.
Islamists arrived to protest the contentious "Camel Battle"
ruling, which saw 25 figures in the Mubarak regime set free.
While
all sides to the conflict were united in their opposition to the
acquittal, long simmering tensions between the rival parties quickly
spilled over.
The
coalition of liberals and secular-minded groups was particularly
concerned with Islamist control of the body drafting the country's
new constitution.
Fighting
commenced after Muslim Brotherhood supporters tore down a podium
belonging to a group chanting anti-Morsi slogans, AFP reported.
“Down,
down with rule by the guide,” Morsi's
detractors chanted in reference to Mohammed Badie, the leader of the
Muslim Brotherhood. Morsi officially resigned from the Brotherhood
upon assuming office, but his opponents believe that he maintains
control over the president.
Egyptians inspect a burnt bus which was set on fire during clashes on Tahrir square in Cairo on October 12, 2012 (AFP Photo / Khaled Desouki)
On
Friday Morsi was in Egypt's second largest city, Alexandria, where he
vowed that the former regime's figures would be held accountable in
spite of Wednesday's ruling.
Morsi
moved to dismiss the country's prosecutor general – a Mubarak
appointee – following the controversial verdict. The
prosecutor, Abdel-Maguid Mahmoud refused to resign and accept an
offer to be Egypt's envoy to the Vatican.
Following
Friday's altercations on Tahrir Square, the April 6 movement, which
played a key role in ousting Mubarak from power, said its supporters
would march on the prosecutor's office.
Egyptian opponents of the Muslim Brotherhood and President Mohamed Morsi (top) confront government supporters in Tahrir square in Cairo on October 12, 2012 (AFP Photo / Khaled Desouki)
Egyptians evacuate a wounded man during clashes between government supporters and opponent of the Muslim Brotherhood and President Mohamed Morsi in Tahrir square in Cairo on October 12, 2012 (AFP Photo / Khaled Desouki)
Egypt on the road to Islamization?
Fears
that Egypt's controversial new draft constitution will lead to the
establishment of an Islamist state were expressed by Trew, who argued
that a "massive Islamization of the constitution" is
underway.
“Key
articles in the constitution, like Article 2 and Article 36 relating
to the Egyptian penal code and also relating to women’s’ rights,
are really seeing a lot of Islamization, in which people are saying
Egyptian law should not only derive from Islamic Sharia, but actually
follow Islamic Sharia. This is one of the ongoing battles in the
Constituent Assembly,"she
said.
Trew
also said that many fear that draft Article 36 will put women
directly under the thumb of "Islamic
jurisprudence."
"In
addition, they have to reconcile their domestic responsibilities with
the other sides of their life. Basically implying that [for] women,
the home comes first," she
continued.
But
Barah Mikail, a senior researcher on Middle Eastern issues at the
FRIDE think tank, told RT that talks of Egypt becoming an Islamist
country were premature.
“I
wouldn’t talk about any danger when it comes to Egypt’s global
reorganization of social and political aspects. We haven’t got a
clear picture of what could occur in the future. What we know [is
that] whenever the constitution is definitely drafted, it will also
be submitted to a vote. This is why I think there is no real threat
on the future of Egypt when it comes to [talking] about
its [return] to
an authoritarian regime or a dictatorship,” he
said.
“At
the same time, whatever result we receive with the constitution, we
will still have growing frustrations among the Egyptian population.”
Jerusalem
Post journalist Yaakov Lappin was less optimistic about Egypt's
constitution, telling RT that many of the current draft laws being
debated were disconcerting "for
anyone who would like to see Egypt remain a secular, democratic
state."
"There
was a draft clause that would make Al-Azhar – the foremost Sunni
Islamic learning institution – some sort of body that would be able
to decide whether new laws are compatible or incompatible with
Islamic law. These are the basic steps that one would take if one
wanted to set up an Islamist state," he
said.
"As
long as a majority of people who are setting up the new constitution
are Islamists, they will naturally seek to create an Islamist state,
and at this stage I don’t see how that could be avoided."
Bahraini
protesters emboldened by police teargassing
Bahraini
police fired tear gas and stun grenades at hundreds of demonstrators
at a pro-democracy protest in the capital, Manama. Thousands joined
in for a second march after the initial rally was forcefully
dispersed.
RT,
12
October, 2012
Riot
police clashed with participants in the "Destination Manama"
rallies, which called for the right to self-determination and
increased freedoms for the country’s Shiite Muslim majority.
Protesters
chanted “We
want freedom!”,
“Democracy!”,
“Free Nabeel
Rajab!”
and even “Down,
down, down Hamad!”
The last was in reference to King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa, the head
of Bahrain’s ruling monarchy.
A
YouTube video from "Destination Manama" showed men and
women fleeing security forces as shooting was heard in the
background.
Bahrain's
Interior Ministry, meanwhile, wrote on Twitter that its police had
stepped in to restore order after groups of “thugs”
began rioting and “hurling
Molotov cocktails”
at law enforcement.
But
Sayed Yousif al-Muhafda, from the Bahrain Center for Human Rights,
denied the Interior Ministry’s report.
“It
was a peaceful protest,”
al-Muhafda told RT. “All
the people were carrying were Bahraini flags. There were no Molotov
cocktails. It was witnessed by human rights organizations and
journalists."
After
the first protest was dispersed and arrests were made, demonstrators
regrouped and continued their rally.
Thousands
joined in for the second march, led by main opposition bloc al-Wefaq,
Reuters reported. Their slogan was "Stop
the shedding of our blood, we will not give up our demands."
Women riot police detain an anti-government protester in Manama October 12, 2012 (Reuters / Stringer)
Bahrain,
which hosts the US Navy’s Fifth fleet, continues to see almost
daily demonstrations and clashes.
The
country's Shiite majority demands a bigger role in running the
country, which is controlled by the Sunni al-Khalifa family.
At
least 50 people have died in nearly 20 months of unrest, with a
16-year-old boy becoming one of the latest victims.
Thousands
of anti-government activists have been arrested, says the Bahrain
Center for Human Rights. This includes human rights activist Nabeel
Rajab who, after several detainments, was sentenced to three years in
jail for “participation
in an illegal assembly”
and “calling
for a march without prior notification.”
Image from twitter @Bhr14Fb
‘US will not tolerate democratic reform in Bahrain’
Discussing
with RT why the popular uprising in Bahrain does not get as much
coverage in the Western media as revolts in Egypt, Libya and other
countries, Dominic Kavakeb, from Bahrain's Justice and Development
Movement, says the current leaders of Bahrain are viewed as allies in
the West, hence the leniency among journalists. The West just wants
to keep up al-Khalifa’s rule, he said.
“What
they don’t realize, however, is that they have huge leverage to
convince Bahrain into reforms,”
says Kavakeb. “The
reality is that when Bahrain is calling for democracy and change, it
does not have to be against the West’s interests. It would actually
be much more in the interest of the entire world to have a democratic
and stable country.”
But
geopolitical analyst Patrick Henningsen believes the US and other
Western countries are looking to sustain the Shiite uprising in
Bahrain instead of allowing reforms. He explains it by the high
probability that the country's Shiite majority coming to power would
not tolerate any confrontation with Iran.
“The
US will not tolerate any sort of democratic reform or uprising in
Bahrain, because they need a hardcore dictatorship in place. There
are obviously many military assets they’ve got in the country. They
also rely on the Bahraini royal family to support them in Israel, and
if not in isolating or positioning to attack Iran, then at least in
minimizing the influence the Persian country has in the region,”
Henningsen told RT.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.