Bernanke Begs Congress to Address "Fiscal Cliff", Pledges to Hold Interest Rates Near Zero Through Mid-2015 Even If Economy Picks Up
1
October, 2012
Fed
Chairman Ben Bernanke was yapping about jobs today in his speech Five
Questions about the Federal Reserve and Monetary Policy in
Indianapolis.
Bernanke asked five questions of himself and gave five self-serving responses, all absolving the Fed of its role in the global financial crisis.
Bernanke also patted himself on the back numerous times (indeed in the answers to nearly every question).
In particular, Bernanke bragged about the inflation-fighting prowess of the Fed, not pointing out the Fed and fractional reserve lending are the source of inflation.Direct Lies
In the direct lie category, Bernanke stated "The Federal Reserve is also very open about its finances and operations."
In reality, it took freedom-of-information lawsuits from Bloomberg and others to get information from the Fed. The Fed still does not want to be audited.
Here are a couple of key snips regarding monetary and fiscal policy.
Pledge To Hold Rates Low
In the category of communications policy, we also extended our estimate of how long we expect to keep the short-term interest rate at exceptionally low levels to at least mid-2015. That doesn't mean that we expect the economy to be weak through 2015. Rather, our message was that, so long as price stability is preserved, we will take care not to raise rates prematurely. Specifically, we expect that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the economy strengthens. We hope that, by clarifying our expectations about future policy, we can provide individuals, families, businesses, and financial markets greater confidence about the Federal Reserve's commitment to promoting a sustainable recovery and that, as a result, they will become more willing to invest, hire and spend.
Bernnake Begs Congress to Address "Fiscal Cliff"
I certainly don't underestimate the challenges that fiscal policymakers face. They must find ways to put the federal budget on a sustainable path, but not so abruptly as to endanger the economic recovery in the near term. In particular, the Congress and the Administration will soon have to address the so-called fiscal cliff, a combination of sharply higher taxes and reduced spending that is set to happen at the beginning of the year. According to the Congressional Budget Office and virtually all other experts, if that were allowed to occur, it would likely throw the economy back into recession. The Congress and the Administration will also have to raise the debt ceiling to prevent the Treasury from defaulting on its obligations, an outcome that would have extremely negative consequences for the country for years to come. Achieving these fiscal goals would be even more difficult if monetary policy were not helping support the economic recovery.
Bernanke Tosses Monetarist and Keynesian Hats Into
the Ring
Although Bernanke does not want Congress meddling in monetary policy at all, he meddles in fiscal policy all the time. Bernanke cannot make decisions or pass laws, however, Bernanke is clearly warning Congress the alleged "Fiscal Cliff" of tax hikes and automatic budget cuts "would likely throw the economy back in recession".
I suggest the US economy is already back in recession. Regardless, Keynesian and Monetarist clowns (Bernanke wears both hats when he attempts to manipulate Congress), never want to do anything "now" to fix structural problems.
Indeed, Bernanke does not even want to do anything until at least mid-2015 regardless of what the economy is doing.
If you want to know why the boom-bust cycles have ever-increasing amplitudes and troughs, look at the policies of the Fed.
Bear in mind that I side with Bernanke that price inflation is not going to get out of hand. However, His policies have destroyed those on fixed income (a claim he tries but fails to address in his five questions). More importantly, those with first access to money (primarily banks and the wealthy) are the biggest beneficiaries of monetary printing exercises.
Those wondering how the 1% got so wealthy need only look at the Fed for the answer.
That was a question Bernanke did not address, but I addressed in detail a few days ago in Can the Fed Fight Droids and Win? Apple's SIRI, Driverless Trucks, What's Next? Riveting Video: Are Droids Taking Our Jobs?
Please take a look at that post if you have not yet done so.
Bernanke asked five questions of himself and gave five self-serving responses, all absolving the Fed of its role in the global financial crisis.
Bernanke also patted himself on the back numerous times (indeed in the answers to nearly every question).
In particular, Bernanke bragged about the inflation-fighting prowess of the Fed, not pointing out the Fed and fractional reserve lending are the source of inflation.Direct Lies
In the direct lie category, Bernanke stated "The Federal Reserve is also very open about its finances and operations."
In reality, it took freedom-of-information lawsuits from Bloomberg and others to get information from the Fed. The Fed still does not want to be audited.
Here are a couple of key snips regarding monetary and fiscal policy.
Pledge To Hold Rates Low
In the category of communications policy, we also extended our estimate of how long we expect to keep the short-term interest rate at exceptionally low levels to at least mid-2015. That doesn't mean that we expect the economy to be weak through 2015. Rather, our message was that, so long as price stability is preserved, we will take care not to raise rates prematurely. Specifically, we expect that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the economy strengthens. We hope that, by clarifying our expectations about future policy, we can provide individuals, families, businesses, and financial markets greater confidence about the Federal Reserve's commitment to promoting a sustainable recovery and that, as a result, they will become more willing to invest, hire and spend.
Bernnake Begs Congress to Address "Fiscal Cliff"
I certainly don't underestimate the challenges that fiscal policymakers face. They must find ways to put the federal budget on a sustainable path, but not so abruptly as to endanger the economic recovery in the near term. In particular, the Congress and the Administration will soon have to address the so-called fiscal cliff, a combination of sharply higher taxes and reduced spending that is set to happen at the beginning of the year. According to the Congressional Budget Office and virtually all other experts, if that were allowed to occur, it would likely throw the economy back into recession. The Congress and the Administration will also have to raise the debt ceiling to prevent the Treasury from defaulting on its obligations, an outcome that would have extremely negative consequences for the country for years to come. Achieving these fiscal goals would be even more difficult if monetary policy were not helping support the economic recovery.
Bernanke Tosses Monetarist and Keynesian Hats Into
the Ring
Although Bernanke does not want Congress meddling in monetary policy at all, he meddles in fiscal policy all the time. Bernanke cannot make decisions or pass laws, however, Bernanke is clearly warning Congress the alleged "Fiscal Cliff" of tax hikes and automatic budget cuts "would likely throw the economy back in recession".
I suggest the US economy is already back in recession. Regardless, Keynesian and Monetarist clowns (Bernanke wears both hats when he attempts to manipulate Congress), never want to do anything "now" to fix structural problems.
Indeed, Bernanke does not even want to do anything until at least mid-2015 regardless of what the economy is doing.
If you want to know why the boom-bust cycles have ever-increasing amplitudes and troughs, look at the policies of the Fed.
Bear in mind that I side with Bernanke that price inflation is not going to get out of hand. However, His policies have destroyed those on fixed income (a claim he tries but fails to address in his five questions). More importantly, those with first access to money (primarily banks and the wealthy) are the biggest beneficiaries of monetary printing exercises.
Those wondering how the 1% got so wealthy need only look at the Fed for the answer.
That was a question Bernanke did not address, but I addressed in detail a few days ago in Can the Fed Fight Droids and Win? Apple's SIRI, Driverless Trucks, What's Next? Riveting Video: Are Droids Taking Our Jobs?
Please take a look at that post if you have not yet done so.
Bernanke Says Don't Worry,
"It's Only Temporary"
1
October, 2012
Earlier
today, in Bernanke
Begs Congress to Address "Fiscal Cliff", Pledges to Hold
Interest Rates Near Zero Through Mid-2015 Even If Economy Picks Up I
commented on the Bernanke's self-serving responses to his own
questions.
In this post I want to focus on another disingenuous part of his speech that I did not comment on previously. Specifically ...
With monetary policy being so accommodative now, though, it is not unreasonable to ask whether we are sowing the seeds of future inflation. A related question I sometimes hear--which bears also on the relationship between monetary and fiscal policy, is this: By buying securities, are you "monetizing the debt"--printing money for the government to use--and will that inevitably lead to higher inflation? No, that's not what is happening, and that will not happen. Monetizing the debt means using money creation as a permanent source of financing for government spending. In contrast, we are acquiring Treasury securities on the open market and only on a temporary basis, with the goal of supporting the economic recovery through lower interest rates. At the appropriate time, the Federal Reserve will gradually sell these securities or let them mature, as needed, to return its balance sheet to a more normal size. Moreover, the way the Fed finances its securities purchases is by creating reserves in the banking system. Increased bank reserves held at the Fed don't necessarily translate into more money or cash in circulation, and, indeed, broad measures of the supply of money have not grown especially quickly, on balance, over the past few years.
Gradual Bullsheet
Bernanke knows damn well that the Fed will never "gradually sell these securities". Rather, the only way the Fed would be willing to sell securities is at break-even or a profit.
Yet, if Bernanke honors his pledge to hold those securities until after a recovery is well underway, interest rates will be higher and the Fed will have losses.
Thus, it is the clear intent of the Fed to hold assets it buys from now until maturity (perhaps a decade from now, which for all practical purposes is "permanent"). At that point in the distant future, the Fed may even roll the securities over.
Who Benefits From This?
As I did note previously ...
Bernanke's policies have destroyed those on fixed income (a claim he tries but fails to address in his five questions). More importantly, those with first access to money (primarily banks and the wealthy) are the biggest beneficiaries of monetary printing exercises.
Those wondering how the 1% got so wealthy need only look at the Fed for the answer.
That was a question Bernanke did not address, but I addressed in detail a few days ago in Can the Fed Fight Droids and Win? Apple's SIRI, Driverless Trucks, What's Next? Riveting Video: Are Droids Taking Our Jobs?
Finally, when it comes to "printing" let's flashback to December 8, 2010: Caught in a Massive Lie: Daily Show Comments on Bernanke's Lies Regarding "Printing Money"
In this post I want to focus on another disingenuous part of his speech that I did not comment on previously. Specifically ...
With monetary policy being so accommodative now, though, it is not unreasonable to ask whether we are sowing the seeds of future inflation. A related question I sometimes hear--which bears also on the relationship between monetary and fiscal policy, is this: By buying securities, are you "monetizing the debt"--printing money for the government to use--and will that inevitably lead to higher inflation? No, that's not what is happening, and that will not happen. Monetizing the debt means using money creation as a permanent source of financing for government spending. In contrast, we are acquiring Treasury securities on the open market and only on a temporary basis, with the goal of supporting the economic recovery through lower interest rates. At the appropriate time, the Federal Reserve will gradually sell these securities or let them mature, as needed, to return its balance sheet to a more normal size. Moreover, the way the Fed finances its securities purchases is by creating reserves in the banking system. Increased bank reserves held at the Fed don't necessarily translate into more money or cash in circulation, and, indeed, broad measures of the supply of money have not grown especially quickly, on balance, over the past few years.
Gradual Bullsheet
Bernanke knows damn well that the Fed will never "gradually sell these securities". Rather, the only way the Fed would be willing to sell securities is at break-even or a profit.
Yet, if Bernanke honors his pledge to hold those securities until after a recovery is well underway, interest rates will be higher and the Fed will have losses.
Thus, it is the clear intent of the Fed to hold assets it buys from now until maturity (perhaps a decade from now, which for all practical purposes is "permanent"). At that point in the distant future, the Fed may even roll the securities over.
Who Benefits From This?
As I did note previously ...
Bernanke's policies have destroyed those on fixed income (a claim he tries but fails to address in his five questions). More importantly, those with first access to money (primarily banks and the wealthy) are the biggest beneficiaries of monetary printing exercises.
Those wondering how the 1% got so wealthy need only look at the Fed for the answer.
That was a question Bernanke did not address, but I addressed in detail a few days ago in Can the Fed Fight Droids and Win? Apple's SIRI, Driverless Trucks, What's Next? Riveting Video: Are Droids Taking Our Jobs?
Finally, when it comes to "printing" let's flashback to December 8, 2010: Caught in a Massive Lie: Daily Show Comments on Bernanke's Lies Regarding "Printing Money"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.