Russia’s
Gazprom Tightens Its Stranglehold On Europe, France Falls: The
Natural Gas War Gets Dirty
Wolf
Richter
31
August, 2012
Why
would France suddenly prohibit
shale gas exploration? Sure, there are environmental issues with
horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the methods used to
extract gas from porous shale deep underground: flammable drinking
water, earth quakes, cows that die, radioactive sludge in sewage
treatment plants.... But French governments have had, let’s say, an
uneasy relationship with environmentalists. Its spy service DGSE, for
example, sank Greenpeace’s flagship, the Rainbow
Warrior, in
the port of Auckland, New Zealand, killing one person.
No,
there must have been another reason why the government of Nicholas
Sarkozy prohibited shale gas exploration in 2011, after having
already issued permits in 2010. A mini hullabaloo had broken out,
stirred up by the European Ecologists and The Greens (EELV), the
fringe on the French left. And Sarkozy caved! Without a fight!
Enthusiastically. The government of François Hollande just confirmed
the prohibition when Environment Minister Delphine Batho declared:
“Hydraulic fracturing remains and will remain prohibited.”
The
clue: Sarkozy suddenly visited Japan on March 31, 2011, a couple of
weeks after the horrific earthquake and tsunami, and the subsequent
nuclear accident at Fukushima, to declare in front of shell-shocked
Japanese that there was “no alternative” to nuclear power.
He’d
been dispatched by the almighty state-owned nuclear industry to tamp
down on the growing anti-nuclear sentiment at home. Owned by the
government, nuclear power plants produce 75% of France’s
electricity and export some of it. No one who wants to be politically
viable is allowed to hamper the industry. If someone strays off the
reservation, he or she is dragged back soon. While Hollande
campaigned on a vague promise to reduce dependency on nuclear power
to 50%, it was understood as one of the bones he had to toss to
environmentalists. Nothing would come of it.
So
when Batho, who wants to add more renewables to the portfolio, toed
the party line by saying, “Nuclear power is an industry with
future,” then qualified it
with a “but,” it caused an outcry even among the Socialists.
That’s the power the nuclear industry has over the political
machines.
But
now another powerful entity turned up: Russia’s Gazprom. It’s the
world’s largest gas producer, gas exporter, and gas distribution
company with nearly 100,000 miles of gas trunk lines and branches.
The Russian government owns 50.01% of it. At home, it has to sell gas
under cost, one of the Soviet leftovers. It relies on high-profit
sales from Europe to make up for it. But Europe is diversifying away
from its single most important supplier.
Competitors
include Russia’s number two, Novatek, and Norway—the second
largest natural
gas exporter in the world. So, in April, Gazprom had to lower its
European sales guidance for 2012. Its market share in Europe was 27%
last year, and it’s shooting for 30% by 2020, but if the US
shale-gas boom ever infects Europe, those plans would become a
pipedream—and if the high-profit sales from Europe tapered off
further, it would have to raise prices at home, a political
nightmare. Hence its fight by hook or crook against shale gas in
France.
Gazprom’s
“underhanded tactics” and “scaremongering about a new
technology” have Moscow’s nod of approval and are designed to
dissuade governments from developing their own shale-gas reserves,
according to a report by Platts,
a global provider of information on energy, petrochemicals, and
metals. Efforts include all manner of operations, online and through
encouraging demonstrations, but also paying public relation firms to
spread “myths and misconceptions,” said Aviezer
Tucker, assistant director of the Energy Institute at the University
of Texas. A “European Union-wide ban” on shale-gas production, he
said, would be the “holy grail.”
With
France already knocked off, Sergei Komlev of Gazprom Export has been
bouncing around the world in his fight against European shale gas. At
a meeting in Qatar, according to Platts’ report, he gave a
presentation. “Multiple Handicaps Will Retard Shale Gas Development
Outside US” was the title of one of his slides. “Fortunately, it
claimed, “European shale gas development faces numerous economic,
regulatory, and political barriers before there are significant
amounts of shale gas production, not sooner than in ten or more
years.”
Breathing
room for Gazprom in the natural gas wars.
In
the US, natural gas may be the most mispriced commodity these days.
Its price has been below the cost of production for so long that the
industry is suffering billions in losses. But demand for natural gas
by power producers has been booming—and it’s killing coal, one
powerplant at a time. Read.... Natural
Gas Is Pushing Coal Over The Cliff.
And
here is a highly insightful interview of James Hamilton, energy
economist, former visiting scholar at the Federal Reserve Board in
Washington, DC and other Federal Reserve Banks. Read.... The Real
Reason Behind Oil Price Rises,
by James Stafford.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.