-->
I
would like to put this aside but there are too many disclosures that
keep coming out.
Perhaps
the truth of the relationship between this government and the
American government will come out.
SIS
under scrutiny in Dotcom surveillance case
27
September, 2012
The
Security Intelligence Service appears to have known about the
residency status of internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom before another
government spy agency unlawfully intercepted his communications.
This
week, the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) became the
subject of an inquiry after revelations it unlawfully spied on Mr
Dotcom and his colleagues.
Mr
Dotcom, a German national, is fighting extradition to the United
States to face copyright, money laundering and fraud charges.
The
GCSB believed that Mr Dotcom and a co-accused were foreign nationals
due to incorrect advice from police, but they have New Zealand
residency.
Radio
New Zealand's political editor Brent Edwards says it appears the SIS
would have checked Mr Dotcom's background when he applied for and got
residency.
Mr
Edwards told Morning Report on Thursday the SIS has a close
relationship with the GCSB and it is understood the application would
have gone through a process known as silent approval.
"The
SIS itself says it checks thousands of visas for people coming into
the country, although these are mainly related to concerns over
terrorism. In its report it says in terms of threat management, it
does give border screening advice."
Kim
Dotcom's US-based lawyer says he is seeking full disclosure of the
Government's reasons for spying on his client to protect the rights
of all New Zealanders.
Ira
Rothken told Morning Report he also wants to know at what point they
learned what they were doing was illegal.
"We're
just interested in getting full and transparent disclosure - not only
to protect Mr Dotcom's rights, but also for the benefit of all New
Zealand residents who would prefer the Government not engage in such
conduct."
Immigration
Minister Nathan Guy is not commenting, apart from saying the matter
will be covered by the inquiry looking into the GCSB's actions.
Dotcom
case likened to Te Urewera raids
27
September, 2012
Opposition
MPs are drawing comparisons between the Kim Dotcom spying case and
the police raids in Te Urewera National Park.
Charges
against most of the people arrested in the Bay of Plenty raids in
2007 were dropped after the Supreme Court ruled that police broke the
law with their covert video surveillance.
This
week, the Government Communications Security Bureau became the
subject of an inquiry after revelations that it unlawfully spied on
the German internet entrepreneur and his colleagues.
Kim
Dotcom is fighting extradition to the United States to face
copyright, money laundering and fraud charges.
The
spy agency believed that Mr Dotcom and a co-accused were foreign
nationals due to incorrect advice from police, but they have New
Zealand residency. It is illegal for the GCSB to spy on New Zealand
residents and it is being investigated over the matter.
The
Green Party says the Government needs to make its crime-fighting
agencies more transparent, so the public can have confidence they are
doing the right thing.
Co-leader
Metiria Turei says there are similarities between police breaking the
law with their covert surveillance during the 2007 raids and the
illegal spying on Mr Dotcom.
Ms
Turei says because there is no transparency, people can neither
protect themselves nor hold the Government to account.
Maori
Party MP Te Ururoa Flavell says as soon as he heard about the illegal
surveillance of Mr Dotcom he was reminded of the raids in his
Waiariki electorate.
New
Zealand First leader Winston Peters says the commonality in the two
cases is the breaching of the law by agencies supposed to be
enforcing it.
However,
Police Minister Anne Tolley says comparing them is drawing a very
long bow.
For
television coverage and an interview with Kim Dotcom's US attorney
Ira Rothken GO
HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.