Nine
years later the murder by Israelis of Rachel Corrie and the
bulldozing of palestinian homes may seem to be eclipsed by an
avalanche of events that are upon us now.
But
to me, this is still shocking even if the whitewashing by the
Israelis is unsurprising. We must never get desensitised to these
individual acts of extreme injustice.
Israeli
court acquits IDF in 2003 death of American pro-Palestinian activist
Rachel Corrie
An
Israeli judge has exonerated a military investigation that acquitted
the IDF of the killing of a US activist by a bulldozer. The judge
reiterated that the death was “an accident,” while the victim’s
family insists she was purposefully run over.
RT,
28
August, 2012
Nine
years after US activist Rachel Corrie was crushed to death by an
Israeli army bulldozer, her family has been handed a verdict in their
civil lawsuit against Israel.
The
court ruled that the state was not at fault for Corrie’s death and
that an earlier military investigation, which cleared troops of
wrongdoing, was conducted appropriately. It further stated that there
was neither intent nor negligence involved.
After
hearing the verdict, Rachel's mother Cindy said that she was deeply
saddened, but expected that the IDF soldiers would be granted
systemic impunity.
"Now
we know that the protection for soldiers extends to the court,"
she told reporters outside the court. “At least we have had access
to a court system, which most Palestinians are denied," she
said.
“While
not surprising, this verdict is yet another example of where impunity
has prevailed over accountability and fairness,” attorney for the
Corrie family Hussein Abu Hussein said in a statement posted on the
Rachel Corrie foundation website.
On
March 16, 2003, the 23-year old American was crushed and killed by an
Israeli bulldozer while attempting to stop the vehicle from
destroying Palestinian homes on the Egypt-Gaza border. Corrie was a
volunteer with the International Solidarity Movement, and was one of
eight American and British activists attempting to prevent the
demolition.
The
Israeli army had been conducting systematic demolitions in the
densely populated area in an attempt to halt gun and mortar attacks
against soldiers and Jewish settlers.
An
investigation by an Israeli military court cleared the IDF of
wrongdoing, concluding that Corrie’s death was an accident and that
she was at fault for endangering herself.
“Rachel
Corrie was not run over by an engineering vehicle but rather was
struck by a hard object, most probably a slab of concrete which was
moved or slid down while the mound of earth which she was standing
behind was moved,” the IDF report said.
The
driver, whose name has never been disclosed, insisted he had not seen
the activist despite her wearing an orange jacket and being clearly
visible. The Corrie family was unable to take him to court, as the
Israeli Supreme Court has upheld a decision to shield him from
prosecution.
Eyewitness
accounts from Rafah claimed that the driver of the bulldozer was
aware that Corrie was in front of the vehicle, but continued to
demolish the house and intentionally crushed her in the process.
“The
bulldozer went towards her very slowly, she was fully in clear view,
straight in front of them,” witness Tom Dale of Lichfield,
Staffordshire, said.
No
charges were brought against the driver or his superiors, and the
case was closed.
Unsatisfied
by the IDF’s report, the Corrie family launched a civil case
against the state of Israel in March 2010, accusing its military of
either intentionally killing Corrie, or of gross negligence.
The
court ruling exonerated the Israeli military investigation, and
denied any malicious intent or negligence on the part of the IDF.
“Rachel
Corrie was injured as a result of her prohibited action, for which
she is solely responsible, due to her considerable negligence and
lack of caution,” the Israeli Justice Ministry said in a statement.
The
Corrie family's case is the first civil lawsuit on behalf a foreigner
harmed by the IDF to have been concluded in a full civilian trial.
Other cases have resulted in out-of-court settlements.
The
family claimed they spent over $200,000 of their own savings to fly
in witnesses, attend hearings and translate over 2,000 pages of court
transcripts. Their case was supported by an army of volunteers,
including lawyers, translators and media activists.
The
Corries were seeking a symbolic $1 in damages, along with
compensation for costs incurred during litigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.