Bankrupt
California cities slash public services to fund six-figure pensions
As
some California cities face bankruptcy, public services are being
slashed so unusually high pensions can stay on the books. Stockton’s
former police chief rakes in a pension of more than $200,000 a year,
while also working another job.
RT,
4
August, 2012
Former
Stockton Police Chief Tom Morris retired with a $204,000 pension
after just eight months on the job. While his California city became
the largest in the US to file for bankruptcy, he moved to another
city and makes an additional $76,066 salary at a new job.
The
former police chief retired at age 52, and was among four of the
city’s chiefs who held the job for less than three years, while
retiring with an average of 92 per cent of their final salaries.
But
Morris’ unusually high pension is not an isolated incident. City
councils across California have allowed public safety employees to
retire after working for 30 years and collect 90 per cent of their
top salaries. But while raking in a sizable pension, they often take
jobs elsewhere, while still in their early 50’s.
Two
former police chiefs in San Bernardino receive similarly high
pensions. Keith Kilmer receives $216,581 annually, while working
another job. His predecessor, Michael Billdt, who has no college
degree and was accused of trying to bribe an officer to withdraw a
union grievance in exchange for a dropped investigation, receives
$205,014.
“We
have some safety retirees that are actually earning more in
retirement than they earned when they were working, because they were
able to manipulate the system enough in that last year that they
could crank that last year’s income and then get 3 per cent times
their 25 to 30 years,” said Kathy Miller, the city’s vice mayor,
in an interview with Bloomberg News.
And
these pensions are significantly higher than normal – an average
annual payout from the California Public Employees’ Retirement
System is $36,780.
While
Stockton decided on Morris’ exceedingly high pension before going
bankrupt, at a time when its finances seemed promising, it is now
struggling to confront rising pension costs while also dealing with
increasing unemployment and declining property and sales tax revenue.
While
local California governments continue to pay six-figure lifetime
benefits for some retirees, they are slashing local police and fire
services to make up for the costs. They are also cutting library
hours and other public services to keep up with the payments.
“We
didn’t have very many people looking out for the taxpayers when
these deals were negotiated,” San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed told
Bloomberg News. In the past 10 years, his city increased retirement
spending from $73 million to $245 million.
Stockton,
which filed for bankruptcy protection on June 28, continues to fund
expensive employee pensions that it can’t afford.
In
2007, the city borrowed $125 million with a bond issue in order to
pay for enhanced pension benefits. But when the market crashed,
Stockton's assets lost one third of their value, and the town still
owes $124 million on the bonds.
Meanwhile,
San Bernardino, which filed for bankruptcy on August 1, had already
lowered its retirement age for public safety workers from 55 to 50.
In the past year, the city was forced to use 13 per cent of its
budget to pay for its pensions, an increase from 9 per cent in 2007.
Lowering
the retirement age took a strike at San Bernadino's budget that may
have contributed to its bankruptcy filing.
But
after they are made, pensions are usually set in stone, which causes
a dilemma when cities like Stockton, San Bernardino and Mammoth Lakes
go bankrupt.
“You
don’t want [employees] in a vulnerable position where [the
pensions] easily could be lost, but then you also have to make sure
that you have a fair system that can make adjustments if a city’s
finances are tanking,” said State Controller John Chiang.
But
while Stockton’s former police chief is living the life with a
quarter million dollars coming in a year, the broke city has been
left in the dust as it struggles to continue funding the young
retirees' income.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.