Masksaredangerous.com,29 January, 2022For those who just want the short story: Here’s the picture of one drop of New Zealand’s Pfizer COMIRNATY “vaccine” under a cover slip, after it was inadvertently heated lightly, and viewed the same day through dark field microscopy at low magnification, projected onto a TV monitor.
These images below are after a new computer with decent graphics was purchased along with software for the camera.
Increase the magnification on the image below and look closely.
The long story goes like this: I am a physician in good standing, having a background in mathematics and physics from university, then specialized beyond internal medicine after residency. I’ve had extensive phase contrast microscopy experience. People who were injured by the Pfizer jab started showing up in my practice. At this time in 2021, I didn’t have a microscope. Several doctors had come forward in other countries to report strange observations. Dr. Zandre Botha from South Africa showed the uniform strange round circles. La Quinta Columna showed what appeared to be microchips and other formations. Two other doctors talked about parasites and of all things, hydras! This is not my first rodeo. Having previously experienced how those of us that critically look at the vaccine situation are heavily infiltrated by persons wishing to divert and control the narrative, I thought, “What is real?”, “What is put forth in order to lead questioners to look like fools?” Because of my previous extensive microscopy experience, learning to use a dark field microscope didn’t take a huge amount of education. I took a 12 week course on live blood analysis using the most sophisticated dark field microscope and camera, that my money could buy. It magnifies up to 4000x. After having a close look at the blood of dozens of vaccine injured people, patients started asking me about certain round and square bright yellow formations in their capillary blood as seen on the screen.
Nothing in the textbooks identified such things, and various people doing similar work, suggested that they might be crystals or some sort of slide or cover slip anomaly. At first, I just told the patients that it wasn’t important—possibly uric acid or something like that. Then several “empty” vials of Pfizer COMIRNATY vaccine were obtained. I trust the source of the shots 100%. The vials were from recent leftover vaccine after the shots had been given. On a Friday in December, alone in my office, I took the vials out, thawed, and examined them. I drew up all the contents (just a few drops in each one) from each vial into a 3cc syringe with a 16G needle and put one drop of it on a slide with a cover slip, and another slide with a drop of vaccine mixed with a drop of human blood and put a cover slip on it. The images that follow are from the different slides and were taken immediately after the slides were made.
The amount of activity in the liquid and the strange shapes were baffling to say the least. Squares and circles seemed to connect up to each other consistently. Over an hour or two, the squares and circles seemed to enlarge somehow.
On the same hot day, I had to travel from my office to another office some distance away. The slides were packed up in plastic slide mailers and placed in a cardboard box in the car alongside the microscope. It had been a long week, and the ocean looked enticing, so I parked the car with the windows cracked about two inches, went for a 40-minute walk, then continued my drive. At my destination, the microscope was set up and I had another look at the slides. I don’t scare easily but what I saw next gave me a bit of a chill.
The straight lines and corners were lined with squares, rectangles, and circles Wanting better graphics, I purchased a gaming PC laptop. The software was then useable and I could take future images from the video program attached to the camera, for better definition. If this was to be believed by anyone, it had to be repeated and understood better. In the days that followed I contemplated how the formation happened. Was it a function of time? Of the vibration in the car? Heat? Cell towers along the way? It could have been any of those, so I took some more of the liquid and plated out some more slides, put them in multiple slide carriers, drove them all around the city near cell towers for two hours, and then came back. I did get some additional interesting images but nothing like the first one.
A few weeks later, I got hold of some more vaccine from the same source. This time there were lot numbers and four vials. I plated them out separately and also mixed some of the old liquid with the new. The new liquid had far more circles than the first lot, and had fewer squares.
The first attempts gave formations.
Interesting that on the second day when I came back and re-looked, the structures had shifted off their foundations. This may have been from handling the slides but it shows that the formations are “things” and not shadows or dehydration.
After some more attempts, interesting activity and organization occurred, but no dramatic new images were made.
I plated out another batch on the 16th of January. Then I took them out in the car into the city on a hot day and left them in the car with the windows down. It was around 28°C outdoors, and the car got to around 40°C max. When I got home, this image was on the slide with a whole lot more. The experiment was successfully repeated.
It is not for me to make assumptions on what these elements are, but I don’t think this is a normal finding in old style non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The organisation that occurred does not appear to be simply organic, or debris, or artefact, and it is not simply dehydration of the slide. It is highly self-organised and appears to be part of the design of the liquid. For so many months I had pondered why this infection was so severe and important, that the vaccine has to be given to every human on the planet several times—even if one has recovered from Covid. This is unprecedented in vaccine history. Anyone with a dark field microscope can do this same thing. Why aren’t more people looking at the vaccine under a microscope? Why hasn’t the public been informed of the full ingredients of the only FDA approved vaccine for Covid? The following images are from the slide which had one drop of fresh human blood mixed with one drop of vaccine liquid. When the liquid met up to the blood, the white blood cells were annihilated, and the red blood cells heavily damaged. While concentrating on getting as good a focus as possible, I didn’t think too much of what I captured. But when I later looked closer, it was obviously an image of some sort of nano-tech chips linked by “cords”. The cords may be made in part from fibrin. But what is certain is that when mixed with human blood, different things than just “vaccine alone”, happen on the slide.
Have a look.
There were also these startling formations:
I have nothing else to say. The pictures speak for themselves.
This research should be continued by other laboratories.
Get some high quality German slides and cover slips. Place a drop of vaccine from a used vial or a fresh vial. Observe the activity at lower magnification and also at 1600 to 4000x using dark field microscopy. Get a dry incubator for the fresh slides and set it at different temperatures ranging from 38-42 for at least an hour. Observe again. If nothing interesting occurred, try putting it back in the incubator. Follow up the second day. Do the same with a drop of blood and a drop of vaccine. Combine different vaccine lots and use one drop of the combined vaccines on each slide.
Use PPE and vent the space so you are not breathing the liquid (a laminar flow hood would be ideal) and wear gloves
A short time ago I booked in for a session with a new doctor at the Manuka Health Centre where I used to work as an acupuncturist for ten years until 2011 until I shifted to a new doctor at a different centre.
With Dr. William Crawford in Canada for the last 2 years and unlikely to come back any time soon my time at the Connolly Street Medical Centre was pretty disastrous as detailed fully elsewhere.
Intuition told me not to transfer my files back until I had spoken to the new doctor on the basis of the principle "if things look as if they cannot get worse they usually do". By chance we looked at the Manuka Health Centre website and found the following.The following is what caught our attention.Basically, the Centre which still advertises the following on their website is introducing a three- tier system for their patients that seems to exceed Jacinda's shenanigans or MoH guidelines. They still have the following on their website:
"Manuka Health Centre practises integrative medicine. The term integrative medicine refers to the blending of conventional medicine and natural/complementary medicines and/or therapies along with lifestyle interventions and a holistic approach - taking into account the physical, psychological, social and spiritual wellbeing of the person. Our GP's aim to use the most appropriate, safe and evidence-based modalities available."
Then, they somewhat presumptuously announce:
"..If you do not share our health philosophy we may not be the right practise for you to enrol with".
We decided to check on what was happening elsewhere to see if any other organisations are insisting on a phone or video consultation to see a one-on-one consultation (read, 'medical consultation' because a phone conversation is not that).
We rang Wellington hospital and the after-hours clinic to check if they had a policy that was in any way similar. Neither of them did. Their only policy was that patients wear a mask but were otherwise welcome to come in, vaccinated or not.
On Monday morning I rang the Connolly Street clinic and gave the same message and stated that they did not have any streaming before the consultation. What they did not tell me I will detail below.
When we turned up for the consultation we had a an eerie feeling because the car park was completely empty and when we went in the clinic was completely empty apart from staff. It was almost as if they had emptied the whole centre for this consultation with the "unclean", although I never mentioned vaccination status and they didn't ask.
My consultation was with a Dr.Tom Spiegler who arrived in June in the midst of the pandemic at the very time when the best New Zealand doctors were being frozen out of their professions and it was well-nigh impossible to find vacancies in the MIQ
quarantine sessions.He came across in his bio as if he was straight out of the pages of the Guardian, and that impression was only amplified in the conversation.
I told him that I had had the intention of discussing my medical condition before moving over but wanted, first of all, to hear his explanation for the Centre's "streaming" policy.
I showed him a copy of the policy and explained how we had not been able to find any duplication of this elsewhere and showed him the guidelines from the Ministry of Health.In it the Ministry guidelines say that:
"in most cases, with vaccinated staff and other precautions in place, that the risks are unlikely to be high enough to provide sufficient justification to not follow the Code."
And:
An individual seeking healthcare cannot be refused care because of their beliefs. In this case an individual who believes that a vaccine is harmful cannot be refused care for that belief.
They point out clearly that:
The management of unvaccinated individuals through an alternative pathway is highly likely to negatively impact access to care which must be balanced by a demonstrable benefit.
When the rate of community spread is zero or very low, the risk of transmission from any consultation will be very low, unless a person is known to be at higher risk because they are symptomatic or a close contact of a confirmed case.
They say: In addition, in this situation the difference in the risk of transmission between vaccinated and unvaccinated people will be negligible. When the prevalence of disease in the community is high, the risk of transmission from any individual is not negligible and is likely to warrant application of mitigations for all consultations.
That is hardly the situation we are in now.Most surprisingly (given the 24/7 government and media propaganda) the MoH says the following.
"When there is high COVID-19 vaccine coverage (i.e., above 80 percent of eligible people are fully vaccinated), transmission is more likely to occur from a vaccinated than an unvaccinated individual."
His first reaction was quite predictable. He stated that they are not denying treatment but trying to keep everyone, including the unvaxxed "safe" (sic).
The fact that the unvaxxed are put into a special category and have to have to PAY to see if they are worthy of a consultation which they will again have to pay for and they seemingly vacated the whole premises for this consultation speaks otherwise.
He ignored most of my points so I presented him with the latest data from the United Kingdom which shows that the majority of deaths are from people who are vaccinated along with explaining that 100 to 300 or more people have died from vaccine reactions in New Zealand since the beginning of the years compared with the 50 who have died WITH covid from co-morbidities or in one case, gunshot wounds.His response was straight out of the government/media playbook - straight out of Jacinda's authoritarian "single source of information". Quite simple, he said. Only natural that more vaxxed people should be denying "because they are in the MAJORITY."
We could not get. anywhere close to agreeing that the vaccines are ineffective and becoming less so with every day.
For him a vaccine is a vaccine....is a vaccine, although one provides a degree of protection while the other provides none and in fact increases the odds of getting covid.
It was like I was talking to someone just quoting from Newshub or Radio New Zealand (or perhaps more appropriately, the Guardian).
One might have expected that as a health professional talking to someone who clearly knew what he was talking about that he could have provided some real evidence to counter mine.
I have sort of been waiting for that evidence for 2 years but it has never been forthcoming and now I had a professional sitting in front of me was still not forthcoming. There were only two possibilities: either this doctor was monumentally ignorant and should not be sitting where he was or, more worryingly, knows it all and has been instructed to just counter any arguments with propaganda points that
I could have gleaned from any "news" broadcast. I think I know what it is.Clearly very uncomfortable by this time he shut off the consultation although I was paying quite handsomely for his time
POSTSCRIPT
Intrigued by the empty centre the day before we decided to check with the clinic I am still registered with so drove down to have a look. The first difference was that the door was locked and we had to be admitted.
Compared with the completely empty Manuka Health Centre there were quite a few people in the waiting room.
NOTE: I took a photo through the locked door that had a few patients, all wearing facemasks and so indistinct you could not tell distinctly who they are (other than being human beings, male or female).
I have received the following letter from the Connolly Medical Centre in which they are worried by the privacy of their patients.
They are not too worried about the privacy of patients when it comes to vaccine status. That is available to anybody (including restaurants and the like) with the access to a database.
However, to avoid trouble I shall remove the photograph since it is immaterial to the article; all you need to know is that the waiting room is full of patients wearing facemasks behind a locked door.
I could blank out the already indistinct faces but currently it is beyond my computer skills.
***
Compared with the Manuka Health Centre where patients are completely separated from reception and staff by plexiglass (which you can see below) this was absent at Connolly Street.
This is Pam with nurse, Kristen Birch who part from one senior doctor is the sole hangover from when I worked there 12 years ago. If you look you can see that the reception area is completely blocked off by plexiglass.
We decided to drive back to the Manuka Health Centre to find three cars outside in the carpark and just one person in the waiting room.
That is a long way from the 10 years I worked there when it was a happening place and attracted all those seeking an alternative to conventional practise - something,I hasten to add, it really never did - it was really a conventional practise that sold vitamins and minerals.
At 10 am on a Tuesday the carpark would always have been completely full along with the waiting area. All of this has left me with a sinking feeling that I am now left marooned (even more than previously) without hope of medical care. More seriously, it has left me with the question:
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO OUR HEALTH SYSTEM?
The System was already pretty useless, especially for those with chronic conditions and my impression has been of a system that has left differential diagnosis behind and practises algorithmic (AKA "cookbook') medicine that is increasingly dependant on protocols and dictates from the health bureaucrats - I think the weasel word for this is "harmonising".
As if to underscore this I heard a story in the weekend of someone who felt compelled to spend $150,000 for successful treatment of her multiple sclerosis in Russia.
MS is a pretty well-recognised condition They can't treat this in New Zealand?!!
