tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2171175265245997391.post2087170811625907390..comments2024-03-02T23:32:19.314+13:00Comments on Seemorerocks: Carbon emissionsseemorerockshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09638172074263860001noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2171175265245997391.post-70473499435953812122015-03-27T06:49:19.011+13:002015-03-27T06:49:19.011+13:00Not only is what you say correct, (and thanks for ...Not only is what you say correct, (and thanks for your work!) I believe that it is SO correct that if the reading of emissions are indeed as they say, it is far more likely that, instead of the world attaining some mythical "growth without emissions" miracle, the world has gone into economic contraction and it is only the massaged government data that is indicating otherwise. Of especial note is the fact that the same people who laugh at the Chinese government-furnished growth figures, and look instead at both the Baltic Dry, and Chinese railroad traffic (Both down substantially from a year ago) as the true indicators of economic growth, pretend that they accept this idiotic rubric. The main reason that emissions growth is down is indeed that economic growth is not only down in China, the world's largest emitter of said emissions, but collapsing.Robertlowrey.blogspot.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14929839643254994477noreply@blogger.com