Wednesday, 24 June 2020

The shennanigans with NZ's managed isolation

Please note – this is from Mike Hosking, hardly one of the 

most reliable sources out there

51 of 55 people who left 

isolation early were not 

tested


24 June, 2020



The Ministry of Health has finally revealed how many of the 55 people who left managed isolation early on compassionate leave were not tested for Covid.

The answer is 51.

Of the 55, 39 have now tested negative, seven won't be tested for medical reasons or because they are children and one was wrongly counted because their leave application was withdrawn. Of the remaining eight, four are awaiting test results and four still haven't been tested.

Right up to last night, neither Health Minister David Clark nor health chief Dr Ashley Bloomfield could provide these specific details, following revelations last week that two sisters from the UK had left an Auckland hotel early, without being tested. They made a road-trip to Wellington where they tested positive for Covid.

As the Government announced new border testing moves, Clark and Bloomfield faced more questions about why, after a week, they still could not say how many of the 55 had been released early without having had a test.

National leader Todd Muller described it as a "national disgrace".

The answer finally came through last night – 51 of the 55 had left early without a test, the Ministry of Health said.

And of the four that had had a test, two were tested on the day of departure so they must have been released by staff without knowing they were negative.

Auckland University medical professor Des Gorman said it was hard to imagine so much liberty was allowed at the border. While many of the early-release people might not be found to be infectious now, that did not mean they were not infectious at the time, he told Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking.

He said the system failures were extraordinary.

"I have just been dumbfounded that all of this stuff wasn't in place in February."

Gorman agreed with Hosking that the total 2159 people who left managed isolation between June 9 and 16 would not be tracked down now. "While we don't want to over-egg the souffle, we have to make the assumption these people have reseeded the infection in the community. We have to act accordingly to quickly re-achieve the elimination."

Gorman said in order to stay safe, people needed to retain hygiene habits - including washing hands and, if they felt unwell, staying at home and getting tested in more serious cases. "I think we can rely on the military to get the border right. They don't have the same lack of discipline you have among many health officials."

He said rest-homes, retirement villages and the elderly had to be properly protected "this time", with proper boundaries for the vulnerable.

The Government also needed to sort out contact-tracing, Gorman said. It was taking days to find people's contacts - a "ridiculous" amount of time.

The Government has ordered regular mandatory testing of people working at the border including air crew and people working in quarantine and isolation centres as it faces continued pressure over past failures.

Clark said the new testing regime would also include such people as drivers who ferry arrivals from the airport to isolation, cleaners, immigration, customs, and biosecurity and security staff.

Air New Zealand crew would be regularly tested, Clark said, but he could not say whether air crew from non-New Zealand airlines flying from hotspots such as India or the United States would be tested.

Two new cases of Covid-19 were confirmed yesterday, and with one of the sisters from Britain recovered, the current number of active cases is 10.

Six are from India, one from Britain, two from Pakistan and one from the United States.

All are in quarantine except the sister from Britain who is in self-isolation in the community in the Hutt Valley.

The failures in testing at day three and day 12 of 14-days managed isolation came to light only after the sisters were released early but tested positive after driving from Auckland to Wellington.

They were two of 55 people in 14-days of managed isolation who were allowed to leave early on compassionate grounds since June 9 when routine testing at day three and 12 was supposed to have started.

Announcing the new testing regime, Clark said that to ensure surveillance testing of the population was appropriate and equitable, the Ministry of Health would rigorously monitor testing rates across district health boards and population groups.

The ministry would conduct a weekly review of testing by each DHB and by ethnic group.

"We will be requiring DHBs to take specific actions to increase access to testing for population groups where there is significant variation to national or regional average rates."

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern faced questions from Muller about whether the testing that had taken place had been legally mandatory or voluntary.

Ardern insisted that there had been a firm legal basis for mandatory testing before this week's new Health Order, even though forms given to arrivals said consent was required before a test was taken.

Ardern defended the country's border policy, saying New Zealand was one of only two countries in the world requiring 14 days quarantine, and that required compulsory testing.

"We treat the border with absolute caution. We have some of the most stringent restrictions in the world. There is no playbook for this pandemic, but I stand by the restrictions we have in place."

Who is flying into New Zealand

We are a mobile population normally so this question matters. There is a suspision that we are not being told the entire truth.


Flights into and out of New 

Zealand – what is the 

situation?

Coronavirus live update: 89 new Covid-19 cases, bringing total to ...

I have done an exercise using my VPN to see what happens when I try to book a flight in or out of New Zealand.

The picture that we are fed by government and media is the only flights coming into the country are carrying New Zealanders returning home from overseas.

These are the published regulations





The Customs website makes no mention of covid-19 o restrictions.



I checked the flights coming INTO New Zealand and these are the scheduled flights into Auckland airport.

See how many are coming in from Hong Kong and Shanghai. WHO IS COMING INTO NEW ZEALAND?


 This is the message I get from the NZ-based Flight Centre. Clearly, New Zealanders are not going to any overseas destinations without dispensation.


As a New Zealander I am referred elsewhere


And...



HOW IS IT FOR OTHERS?

No seeming restrictions or problems according to this Singapore-based company


No problems (seemingly) from Hong Kong

This Australian Flight Centre mentions that people will be required to undergo quarantine but says nothing about only being returning New Zealanders.

I checked a New Zealand-based company for flights from Los Angeles to Auckland

And here is the result


So, what is the actual situation?

Whilst it seems overseas travel is off the agenda for New Zealanders the situation seems a little more murky. Clearly there are lots of flights coming into Auckland but how full are they and who is on them.

We know there are lots of foreigners (and I think of Chinese) who were given permanent residence by John Key's government. Just how many of them have second homes here but are normally resident in China which they may be fleeing with the possible onset of a "second wave" of covid-19 in China.

Everything is so opaque and the only information we can get routinely is NZ government PROPAGANDA. So, we may never get any closer to the truth than this.

My visceral reaction to a possible "second wave" with flights coming in with people who are being looked after by the NZ government while the broader New Zealand population having been essentially under house arrest for 6 weeks and still subject to restrictions.

Coronavirus: Britain's manipulated data



UK Covid 'experts' under fire 

for serious data manipulation 

charges

Horby

SOTT.net,
16 June, 2020

The Government's leading body for Covid19 drug trials - led by the controversial character Professor Peter Horby - stands accused of grossly misleading negative trial results for the coronavirus management drug Hydroxychloroquine. Will this at last be a wake-up call for Boris Johnson?

The lead story in today's France Soir - a long-respected and unaligned French online daily - presents compelling evidence to suggest that the Whitehall/Cabinet Covid19 "advice" team cannot be trusted....and raises yet more doubts about BBC complicity in a false Coronavirus narrative.

Last May 10th, The Slog wrote a scathing critique of the interview given by 'Recovery' boss Professor Peter Horby on the Marr Show. Subsequent events would appear to be proving my analysis correct.

Professor Peter Horby is an epidemiologist, and the Professor of Emerging Infectious Diseases and Global Health at the University of Oxford. He chairs the UK government's New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG). In addition, seven weeks ago he was charged with leading the 'Recovery' trial team into drugs for COVID-19.

It obviously goes without saying that, given the tentacular influence of the Big Pharma lobbying and 'research' funding army, a person in such a position must be seen to have total command of the science involved, and be beyond reproach when it comes to commercial conflicts of interest. As this site has already established, two months ago, his Oxford department announced an agreement with the UK-based global biopharmaceutical company AstraZeneca for the further development, large-scale manufacture and potential distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine candidate currently being trialled by the University.

So that wasn't a good start.

Eight days ago, Horby and his colleague Martin Landray shared this cozy exchange on Twitter in relation to trials of the Covid victim management drug Hyroxychloroquine (HCQ):

tweet
Three days earlier, Horby triumphantly tweeted twice in a duo that categorically confined HCQ to the dustbin of failed Covid19 management drugs:
Horby
© Twitter
You will be unsurprised to learn that HCQ is not a drug made by AstraZeneca. What you probably don't know is that both Corby's assertions about dosage levels and 'no benefit' do not appear to be borne out by the facts of the trial and other trials elsewhere....plus, although the Professor (unless he's been on another planet since January) knows that successful HCQ therapy involves a cocktail of other elements - for example zinc - he chose not to use that combo in the trials.

For some time now, a dedicated team at France Soir has been following this and other sagas concerning Covid19 treatments and distortion of test results. It's lead piece today is headlined 'Recovery Fraud' in relation to the assertions of Horby and Landray.

puzzle pieces
© unknown
These are the key elements of the article: the doses of HCQ administered were four times higher than those recommended by successful trials in France and India; this added to the high toxicity of the therapy and a uniquely high death rate; smaller doses with the use of successful cocktails to further reduce toxicity would have potentially produced a far higher recovery rate.

This is certainly borne out by two major studies in New York City, both of which showed HCQ cocktail recovery levels at 88-95%.

Equally alarming (according to France Soir's team) is that Landray seems at certain points in their interview with him to be unclear about the difference between Hydroxychloraquine and hydroxyquinoline. This from a senior member of the team "advising" the United Kingdom Government on the trial of drugs variously designed to vaccinate against Covid19 and improve the management of infection survival.

Above all, however, the blanket Horby disavowal of the HCQ therapy is totally unjustified, and should be withdrawn.

From a British perspective, the issues raised by this latest revelation about Horby and his team demand answers to myriad crucial questions. But first, let us pause for reflection here. Those rallied against HCQ treatments are Horby's Oxford Recovery mob, Dr Fauci, the World Health Organisation and - almost without exception - Big Pharma. All of them have evoked in me (based on their established behaviour over time) doubts about credibility.

Even the Lancet has now begun to smell what it thinks might be a rat: on June 3rd, it issued an "expression of concern" over a large-scale study of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine it published that led to the World Health Organization suspending clinical trials of the anti-viral drugs as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

In a statement, the medical journal acknowledged "important" questions over the research, after dozens of scientists issued an open letter raising concerns about methodology and transparency around the data, which was provided by the firm Surgisphere.

The American FDA has been sitting on (and occasionally rubbishing) HCQ cocktail infection management for Covid19 since Day 1. I have grave doubts about either the FDA or WHO's freedom from malign Pharma influence....as indeed does the American Medical Association.

I have been looking into the entire Covid19 canvas now for nearly six months. My own opinion is threefold: expectations of vaccine development are ludicrously optimistic - and may indeed prove useless for this virus; given the incredibly low death rate for those under age 70, whether we need a vaccine in the first place is highly questionable; and tests not carried out by those with a moral hazard in relation to Big Pharma show that HCQ cocktails administered early at the correct dosage level can cut even 70+ deaths by around 85%.

The role of Pharma lobbying and research funding is, I think, a central factor in the misleading murk and manipulated data, press coverage and sovereign approaches to this virus.

The UK ramifications are disturbing on so many levels, it seems to me that Peter Hitchens was absolutely spot-on last Sunday when he said that "the Johnson Administration is in Office, but not in power".

Here are the urgent questions to which we all need answers:

  • Whitehall keeps on wheeling out truly appalling duds when it comes to "advice" on Covid19. From Neil Ferguson onwards, they are tainted by oddities and incompetence in the past, holding left-wing and pro-EU views, connected to questionable research funding and serially misleading in their conclusions. Why?
  • Blatant Times, Guardian, BBC and SkyNews bias towards critiques of 'Tory' policy, support for Lockdown, zero investigation of dubious data and using "experts" who turn out to be anything but (frequently via Andrew Marr) represents a dereliction of duty on the part of the British MSM.
  • There remain very clear signs of persistent leaking to, and briefing of, the media by senior Whitehall officials, who are also keeping the Opposition Labour Party 'up to speed' on the latest 'disaster'.
  • In particular, Twitter and Facebook censorship of users questioning the overall narrative are of grave concern.
Despite its constant refrain of being "led by the science", the Johnson Cabinet is in reality being - dare I say it - deliberately misled by rather mediocre Second Division virologists and modellers acting (consciously or otherwise) as agents for Big Pharma.

In turn, the role of Sir Mark Sedwill in this growing farrago needs some daylight cast upon it.

But above all, we need to ask why French MSMs like France Soir and Libération (or even retired wrinklies in Aquitaine) seem able to investigate mendacity in high places....while the British media seem barely able to tie their own shoelaces - let alone become effective Gumshoes.


 See Also:

Totalitarian Tories: British 

PM ditches 2m distancing 

rule for '1m-plus' - but NO 

SINGING!

Johnson sign

23 June, 2020

Members of two different households will be able to drink or dine together from 4 July in England as long as they stick to physical-distancing guidelines, the prime minister has announced, as he confirmed the 2-metre rule would be dropped in favour of a "1-metre-plus" approach.

Households will be able to host visitors, including overnight, and to meet with members of different households, on different occasions - including in a pub, restaurant or hotel, for example.

The 2-metre rule has been central to the government's battle against the spread of Covid-19 but with infections declining, the cabinet has rubber-stamped new, less stringent guidance.

A "1-metre-plus" approach will mean members of the public can be 1 metre away from each other as long as other measures are put in place to limit the transmission of the virus. These include wearing a face covering, installing screens, making sure people face away from each other and providing extra handwashing facilities.

The changes to how many people or households can meet come as a swath of venues in England will be allowed to reopen from 4 July, including pubs, campsites, hairdressers and churches. All of these venues will be expected to collect and keep the contact details of visitors, so they can be traced in the event of a local outbreak of the virus.

Theatres and concert halls will be also be able to reopen but they cannot host live performances because of concerns including the risk that singing can transmit the virus.

Announcing the measures in the House of Commons, Boris Johnson heralded the beginning of the end of "our long national hibernation" and praised the public's "common sense and perseverance" in abiding by the government's guidance in recent weeks.

He said the latest steps towards ending the lockdown were "entirely conditional on our continued defeat of the virus".

Johnson said the number of new infections was declining by 2% every day, and
"while we remain vigilant, we do not believe there is currently a risk of a second peak of infections that might overwhelm the NHS.

"Given the fall in the prevalence of the virus, we can change the 2-metre rule from 4 July, it effectively makes life impossible for large parts of the economy, even without other restrictions.

"Where it is possible to keep 2 metres apart, people should. But where it is not, we will advise people to keep a social distance of 1-metre-plus, meaning they should remain 1 metre apart, while taking mitigations to reduce the risk of transmission.

"Our principle is to trust the British public to use their common sense in the full knowledge of the risks - remembering that the more we open up, the more vigilant we will need to be."
With mitigations in place, he said the protection from the virus would be "broadly equivalent" to remaining 2 metres apart.

Johnson said the Scottish and Welsh governments, and the Northern Ireland executive, would relax their own lockdown measures "at their own pace, based on their own judgment" but he believed all countries were moving in the same direction. Concluding, Johnson said:
"Today we can say that our long national hibernation is beginning to come to an end, and life is returning to our streets and to our shops. The bustle is starting to come back, and a new but cautious optimism is palpable. But I must say to the house it would be all too easy for that frost to return. And that is why we will continue to trust in the common sense and the community spirit of the British people to follow this guidance, to carry us through, and to see us to victory over this virus."
Detailed guidance for different sectors is expected to be published later on Tuesday.

Downing Street has made clear it is prepared to reverse these "easements", if the virus picks up again. The decision on the 2-metre rule was taken after a review carried out by the No 10 permanent secretary, Simon Case.

Johnson has been under intense pressure to relax the rule from Conservative backbenchers and businesses who warned they would not be viable with the 2-metre rule in place.

Government officials stress it remains safer to stay 2 metres apart.

The prime minister will flesh out the new regime at Tuesday afternoon's Downing Street press briefing, where he is expected to be accompanied by the chief medical officer for England, Prof Chris Whitty, and the UK government's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance. Both men sat on the panel reviewing the 2-metre rule.

No 10 announced that after Tuesday's press conference, the daily briefings would come to an end, to be replaced by occasional press conferences when there was a "significant" announcement to be made.

The briefings, broadcast live on TV and radio, have become the focal point for public scrutiny of the government's handling of the pandemic.

The Labour leader, Keir Starmer, responding to Johnson, said: "Overall, I welcome this statement. I believe the government is trying to do the right thing, and in that we support them."

He asked for reassurance that the package of measures had been agreed by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) and stressed that local authorities needed extra resources and powers to carry out local lockdowns.

Victoria, Australia shuts down

This all seems to be based on the people tested rather than the people sick.

How can the following have anything to do with public health?




Victoria’s battle to stop a second wave of coronavirus cases from spiralling could take months, with predictions from one expert that the state may need to return to a hard lockdown for eight weeks.

The worrying upswing saw state Premier Daniel Andrews announce over the weekend that lockdown measures restricting the number of indoor and outdoor gatherings would be returning.

He also said authorities would go door-to-door to make sure the new rules were being followed, with police to patrol virus hot spot areas.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/australia-coronavirus-states-open-wide-as-victoria-locks-down/cebd11bf-73a6-48c1-bdb8-9a4312b98132



https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/coronavirus-concerns-over-victoria-virus-rise/news-story/a48a9a00150d9842ea808220e404fd06

"Optimism is the absence of realism"


From Leunig
Image may contain: text

V for Vendetta that features a virus false flag set in 2020

V for Vendetta - Imagine a 

virus, and that you alone have 

the cure (2005)



The insurrection - on both sides of the country



Seattle officials announced on Monday that they would begin to dismantle the six blocks of occupied streets known as the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, or “Chaz”, following two shootings at the site in 48 hours.

It’s time for people to go home. It is time for us to restore Cal Anderson and Capitol Hill so it can be a vibrant part of the community,” said the Seattle mayor, Jenny Durkan, during a press conference. “We can still accommodate people who want to protest peacefully, come there and gather. But the impacts on the businesses and residents and community are now too much.”

Durkan said Seattle police would be returning to the east precinct, the site they abandoned after a series of dangerous clashes between protesters and law enforcement.

She said they’ll do so “peacefully” and “in the near future” but did not offer an exact timeline.




Seattle's CHOP Just Cost The City A Billion Dollar Company





Townhall Media/Julio Rosas
Well, who didn’t see this coming?
Coronavirus pandemic or not, an investment advisory company is leaving the cultural unrest in Seattle and moving its headquarters to Phoenix’s Camelback Corridor.
” … The unrest that has taken place in the city of Seattle … there is really is not a downtown business community today,” Smead Capital Management, President and CEO Cole Smead told KTAR News 92.3 FM.
Mayor Jenny Durkan has allowed and encouraged an unelected mob to take over and militarize several blocks of downtown Seattle. A man has died because of this. A deaf woman was reportedly sexually assaulted because of this. About 30,000 Seattle residents are now subjected to CHOP’s mob rule and they live in fear of criticizing it. Media are controlled. It’s a segregationist enclave, albeit one that is dependent on the benevolence of the surrounding nation it despises.
CHOP cannot feed itself or power its connection to Reddit. But it can and has killed jobs.
Mayor Durkan is killing Seattle.
“We’re hearing rumors of 40-story buildings that will be only 20-percent occupied by October,” Smead said.
Some of that will be companies allowing employees to continue working at home. Some of that will be companies leaving, taking the taxes they and their employees pay wherever they go.
They will go where they deem the environment conducive to business and safe for its people. Blue cities are become less safe for people and more hostile to businesses by the day.
It’s as if leftists cannot be taught even by obvious and recent examples. Or they’re killing their cities intentionally.

Seattle’s Breakaway CHOP Now Also a Sexual Assault Crime Scene

Austin Protesters Storm Police HQ, Haul Down American, Texas Flags. They Also Burned Them.

Peace-loving vandals?


https://www.toddstarnes.com/crime/black-lives-matter-desecrates-st-johns-church-in-dc/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social-pug&fbclid=IwAR0KVZK2-Z8k89wQuR9fuG4mTq8VHTHhNLHZjBhrBhxgGbZhpB8R5Ar2MZQ

Video: A Japanese Artist, Activist, And Reporter Headed To The CHAZ Protest To Prove That Black Lives Matter In Seattle Was Peaceful. 15 Minutes Later He Left With A Black Eye.


Taro Osamu, a Japanese artist and activist, headed to the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) in order to prove that the occupied community was “peaceful.” Things didn’t quite go as he planned
When he arrived, Osamu noted that there were multiple instances of gunshots and that “at least one boy died,” but hilariously maintained that it was otherwise a nice place.
Then tragedy struck! Osamu was attacked by a rioter on scene and beat to a pulp. Who could have seen that coming? Everyone that has been paying attention.
“I was beaten up in 15 minutes,” Osamu tweeted shortly thereafter. “I will go home for today.”
Unfortunately, Osamu didn’t seem to quite learn his lesson. The next day he was patched up and back out on the street, fighting the power with the same hooligans that left him in a bruised pulp.
One Twitter user commented on his video that other (American) reporters have also been attacked in the Seattle, and that the rioters might otherwise be peaceful if they weren’t “reacting” to the camera. Apparently, we’re to believe that these are some uncharacteristically violent Amish protesters who explode in sudden rage when filmed.

Osamu: “A black grandmother who is three times as heavy as me…”

Osamu has been zipping around the country attempting to seed Japan’s press with propaganda favoring the side of Antifa. He described President Trump as using dog whistles, commented that he was shocked that George Floyd wasn’t killed in “the ghetto”, and made one odd reference to the weight of a protester who was thanking him for his coverage:
“When asked, “Where did you come from?” he said, “It’s from Japan.” A black grandmother, who is three times as heavy as me, came up in tears and asked, “I want to thank you! But now I have COVID-19, can I shake hands?” It was “Of course,” I shook hands. It was a hard, rough, but warm, gentle hand. I somehow remembered what life she had lived. The warmth of this hand. I felt that I had an obligation to convey it to the world.”

A defiant Osamu returns! With A Picture Of A Smiling Black Man To “Prove” The Protests Weren’t Violent

Apparently getting bashed in the face isn’t enough to prove to a determined Japanese leftist reporter that these are not simply peaceful protests. Some people just can’t be saved.
Osamu returned to CHAZ and defiantly took a picture with a black man in order to prove that “this was not a violent protest.” His words, not ours.
The hilariously subtle racism of his own reporting will forever be lost on him.