U.S. and global economies are choking on a massive amount of debt.
While Wall Street and the Mainstream financial media continue to
rationalize the skyrocketing debt as merely the cost of doing
business, the disintegrating fundamentals point to an economic
catastrophe in the making.
course, a full-blown economic meltdown may not occur this year or
even next, but as time goes by, the situation continues to
deteriorate in an exponential fashion. So, the cheerleaders for
higher stock, bond, and real estate prices will continue to get
their way until the economy is thrown into reverse as decades of
increasing debt, leverage and margin finally destroy the engine for
I say for good. What seems to be missing from the analysis is
this little thing called energy. The
typical economist today looks at the global markets much the same way
as a child who is waiting for the tooth fairy to exchange a tooth for
a $20 bill.
When I was a kid, it was $1 per tooth, but like with everything
today, inflation is everywhere.
economists just look at market forces, percentages, and values on a
piece of paper or computer. When economic activity begins to
fall, they try to find the cause and remedy it with a solution.
Most of the time, the solutions are found by printing more money,
increasing debt, changing interest rates or tax percentages.
And… that’s about it.
is no mention of what to do with energy in the economist’s
playbook. For the typical economist, energy is always going to
be there and if there are any future problems with supply, then, of
course, the price will solve that issue. Due to the fundamental
flaw of excluding energy in College economic courses; the entire
profession is a complete face.
even the more enlightened pupils of the Austrian School of Economics
fail to understand the Thermodynamics of value. Instead, we are
only taught about SUPPLY & DEMAND to impact price.
While supply and demand forces impact price, they only do so over a
short period of time. However, the primary factor that
determines price (for most goods, services, commodities, metals
& energy) is the cost of production. Supply and demand only
pull price above or push it below the cost of production trendline.
you don’t have to take my word for it, just look at the following
Debt Per Dollar Of GDP Growth Goes Ballistic
days of issuing a $1 of debt to get $1 or $2 of economic growth are
long gone. Most may believe this was a grand conspiracy by the
elite to control the masses. However, it was more a function of
the Falling EROI – Energy Returned
On Investment and the
Thermodynamics of oil depletion. As the cost to produce oil
consumed more energy, well, the best way to offset that was to issue
following chart shows the relationship between total U.S. debt from
all sectors (public and private) versus domestic GDP:
U.S. debt from all sectors is shown in BLUE while
the U.S. GDP is in BROWN.
You will notice that the total debt and GDP from 1950 to 1970
remained pretty even. It wasn’t until after 1970 did the debt
increase more than the GDP.
That was due to two reasons
U.S. Peaked in conventional oil production in 1970
U.S. EROI of oil fell considerably after 1970
I did not include Nixon dropping the Gold-Dollar Peg in 1971, because
that was a direct result of the two reasons listed above.
We must understand that financial and economic policy is a direct
reaction to the change in energy…. and not the other way around.
for the United States economy to offset falling oil production and
the EROI, it was forced to add more debt per Dollar of GDP growth.
In the 1970’s it took an average of $1.5 of new debt for each $1 of
GDP growth but then it doubled to $3 of debt per GDP growth in the
1980’s. However, the escalation of debt really took off after
to the data put out by FRED, the St. Louis Fed, the U.S. GDP
increased from $10 trillion in 2000 to $19.7 trillion at the end of
2017. However, total U.S. debt (all sectors public and private)
increased from $27.2 trillion to a staggering $68.6 trillion during
the same period. Thus,
total U.S. debt increased by $41 trillion versus approximately $10
trillion in GDP growth. That turns out to be $4 of debt
for each $1 of GDP growth.
also must consider the annual interest expense on the total U.S. debt
of $68 trillion to be approximately $1.4 trillion based on a 2%
interest rate. I have no idea what the average interest rate is
on $68 trillion of debt and liabilities, but if the average interest
rate rises to 5%, then the annual interest expense blows up to $3.4
trillion. As they say, a trillion here and a trillion there…
the U.S. will not have the available cheap energy in the future to
pay back this debt. Thus, as debt implodes, so will the GDP.
Furthermore, if we were to adjust the GDP by the additional credit
and debt, it would be a hell of a lot lower than its current value.
But of course, the GDP figures are calculated by the very economists
who are taught to disregard energy in their market studies in
Debt Per GDP Growth Hit A Record In 2017
to the IIF, Institute
of International Finance,
total global debt reached a new record high of $237 trillion in 2017,
up $21 trillion from the previous year. Now, compare that to
the global GDP growth of $3.9 trillion in 2017, ($75.4 trillion in
2016 to $79.3 trillion last year). If
we divide the $21 trillion of new global debt by the $3.9 trillion in
global GDP growth, it equals an additional $5.4 for each new $1 of
global GDP growth.
arrived at the figures in the chart above the very same way as the
U.S. Debt per GDP growth chart. Even though the values in the
graph suggest that the debt per Dollar of GDP growth continues to
move up at an ever-increase rate, the annual changes are more
volatile. For example, the average global debt per Dollar of
GDP increased more during the 2000-2009 period than from 2010-2017.
This was also true for the United States.
the annual interest expense on global debt of $237 trillion has to be
one hell of a lot. Again, I have no idea what the average
interest rate is on that debt, but even if we assume a conservative
2%, that is $4.7 trillion. How could the world afford $4.7
trillion of an interest expense if the increase in global GDP was
only $4 trillion last year???
understand, I am only making simple assumptions here. If the
global debt is increasing, so must the interest expense to service
this ever-increasing amount of debt. When
the debt service starts to compete with global GDP growth, then we
have a serious problem.
And with the impact of the Falling EROI and Thermodynamics of oil
depletion, global GDP growth will likely begin to stall over the next
notion put forth by some precious metals analysts that if the corrupt
banking system would be allowed to go bankrupt (as it is bankrupt),
then after the pain, the U.S. economy could grow once again.
That will never happen. Why? Many in the alternative
media and precious metals community still don’t understand the dire
energy predicament. So, much like the college trained
economists, they are making the same mistake by analyzing and
forecasting the future of the markets without considering energy.
when the massive amount of debt finally implodes, it will take down
the values of most Stocks, Bonds, and Real Estate. This is not
a matter of “IF,” it’s a matter of “WHEN.” And it
seems as if the WHEN is quickly approaching.