needs roads, bridges and other civilian infrastructure in Europe to
meet its growing military requirements which needs coordination with
national governments and the private sector, the alliance’s chief
said ahead of a defense ministers meeting in Brussels.
ministers from the 29 NATO states arrived in Brussels to begin
discussions on the “revision” of
the NATO Command Structure which envisions a new Command to protect
sea lines between North America and Europe, and another Command
the movement of troops and equipment within Europe.”
Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg believes that a revision of its
command structure is necessary to tackle the alleged threat from
Russia. Thus, for the purpose of “deterrence
and collective defense,”NATO
wants European roads to be ready to handle the quick redeployment of
tanks, artillery and other heavy equipment.
is not only about commands. We also need to ensure that roads and
bridges are strong enough to take our largest vehicles, and that rail
networks are equipped for the rapid deployment of tanks and heavy
equipment,” Stoltenberg said Tuesday
at the pre-ministerial press conference. “NATO
has military requirements for civilian infrastructure, and we need to
update these to ensure that current military needs are taken into
hopes that national governments and the private sector will cooperate
to improve the needed infrastructure, emphasizing that the European
Union has an “important
role to play.”
one new Command will take care of troop and equipment movement across
Europe, the proposed Atlantic Command, Stoltenberg believes, would
strengthen the military bloc’s “ability
to protect the sea lines which are so critical for a transatlantic
have to be able to move forces, troops, across the Atlantic from
North America to Europe. And it will include a command which is
focused on and responsible for the movement of troops within Europe,
which is of course also of a great importance,” Stoltenberg
currently has seven Commands with a total of some 7,000 personnel. At
the height of the Cold War, NATO had 33 different Commands overseeing
22,000 personnel. Stoltenberg argued that the new command structure
is needed to adapt to NATO’s reality in the present security
we have been very focused on out-of-area expeditionary military
operations, now we have to continue to be focused on expeditionary
operations but at the same time increase the focus on collective
defense in Europe, and that's the reason why we are adopting the
command structure,” Stoltenberg
also hopes that the new Command structure will be able integrate into
the cyber domain. “In
every military operation, in any foreseeable possible military
mission or operation of NATO, there will be a cyber component, so
cyber is more and more integrated into everything we do and therefore
we will also as part of the review and the adaptation of the command
structure we will also discuss how we can strengthen... the cyber
element of the NATO command structure,” the
NATO Secretary General said.
has yet to comment on the proposed additions to NATO’s command
structure. Moscow, though, has repeatedly voiced concerns over NATO's
buildup on Russia’s borders that has accelerated in the wake of the
Ukrainian crisis. Late last month, Russian Defense Minister Sergey
Shoigu said Moscow must undertake measures to tackle emerging threats
on its western borders.
implementing a set of measures to neutralize the emerging challenges
and threats,” Shoigu
said. He added the Western Military District will receive more than
1,800 pieces of various new and modernized hardware by the end of
German military has outlined six “worst-case” scenarios for the
future of Europe by 2040. The leaked secret document predicts that
more states will leave a disordered, chaotic and conflict-prone EU –
to join a Russian-led “Eastern bloc.”
secret Defense Ministry paper leaked to Spiegel magazine has shed
light on Berlin’s main concerns about the breakup of the European
community, a scenario apparently feared in most Western capitals.
Entitled ‘Strategic Perspective 2040’ (Strategische Vorausschau
2040), the 102-page policy paper imagines six scenarios that
strategists in Berlin deem plausible.
range from an East-West conflict in which some EU states side with
Russia, to a “multipolar
some states adopt a Russian political or economic model in defiance
of EU agreements.
such scenario, titled ‘The EU in Disintegration and Germany in
Reactive Position,’ sees a world suffering from “decades
of instability.” It
also describes the departure of other states from the EU as well as
Britain, and an end to the bloc’s expansion, stating: “The
EU enlargement has largely been abandoned, [while] more states have
left the European community that lost its global competitiveness.”
increasingly disordered, sometimes chaotic and conflict-prone world
has dramatically changed the security environment of Germany and
military strategists write. Another scenario, dubbed ‘West against
East,’ envisages the demise of European integration due to the
transition by some EU countries to an “Eastern
apparent allusion to the group of Moscow-allied states during Soviet
scenario called ‘Multipolar competition’ predicts extremism on
the rise in Europe as some EU members appear to move closer to
capitalism model.” All
scenarios, drawn by the German military’s Planning Department, are
viewed as conceivable by 2040.
integrity has been pushed to its limits since 2016, when the UK opted
to leave the EU during a nationwide referendum. Britain, one of
Europe’s financial hubs, is set to depart the bloc in 2019. The
simmering Brexit talks are currently focused on the cost of the
departure as well as the status of UK citizens living elsewhere in
the EU and vice versa. Far-right parties in France, the Netherlands
and Austria have in the past called for ‘Frexit,’ ‘Nexit’ and
‘Oexit’ votes respectively.
the EU’s economic powerhouse, has a long tradition of in-depth
strategic planning for every eventuality in the continent. It all
began with the decorated Prussian field marshal Helmuth von Moltke in
the 1850s, and was applied in at least three major conflicts, namely
in 1871 during the war against France, as well as during World War I
and World War II.
without most people noticing, the European Commission is moving ahead
with a strategy that will arguably make the EU into the first fully
operational model of a centralised ‘one state’ supranational
authority: ‘A New World Order’; the longstanding
neoconservative ambition which lies at the heart of global secret
society agendas and US geopolitical hegemony.
key ingredient of this strategy is the establishment of an ‘EU
Treasury’ which, according to Donald Tusk, President of the EU
Council, will come into effect in June 2018, under the official
title: European Monetary Fund. This will result in the single point
control of all EU member state finances.
plan will involve a further leveraging of the power of the major
banks, to consolidate their controlling influence over EU affairs.
By combining an ‘EU Treasury’ and a consolidation of banking
power, a major step will be taken in the ‘amalgamation of
everything’ heist; to be brought under the single umbrella of a
Totalitarian Super State. We are talking about individual country’s
monetary policies; the military; police forces and intelligence
services all being run from a central control unit in Brussels. These
will be followed by more of the same – covering almost all areas of
administrative control, that were once the domain of individual
institution at the forefront of this power grab is the Bank for
International Settlements, based in Basel, Switzerland, which
has global outreach and acts as a funnel for the acquisition and
distribution of vast sums of globally fluid international money.
Bank of International Settlements was established by approximately
eight thousand hedge fund managers with a common ambition to rule the
world. The majority are Luciferians working with what, in another
essay, I have called ‘anti-life’ energies. They inform the World
Bank and the IMF how much money supply will be available from year to
year and what the spending parameters will be.
in line come the central banks: the European Central Bank, The
Federal Bank of the USA, the Bank of England, etc. And below these
come the first tiers of involvement of national governments and, by
extension, the further banking institutions of each country. Thus
government and national treasuries are relegated to being fourth down
from the top of the power pyramid which controls most of our lives
from day to day. Government, in too many cases, is just a vector for
the advancement of corporate ambition.
establishment of a European Union Treasury will mean that a pan
European tax gathering institution is given control over all member
states – superseding the already diluted role played by national
treasuries to administer the economies of sovereign nation states.
in Brussels, it will have the power to gather a whole extra strata of
tax receipts from member state citizens, one of the objectives of
which will be the funding of a programme of complete military
unification – a ‘One EU Army’. A highly significant part of
this process will involve the establishment of an ‘Eastern European
Army’, to be known as ‘Eastern European Forces’.
army will cooperate with NATO in shifting the bloc’s geopolitical
centre of military power and strategy into the most easterly
geographical borders of the EU.
This key role is to be taken by
Poland, which has just raised its military defence budget to 2.5% of
GDP and stepped up the number of its military personnel accordingly.
has rubber stamped the easterly move by setting-up a ‘Centre of
Excellence’ in Krakow; the opening ceremony of which involved
inviting Poland’s leading defence chiefs to sign-up to a ‘New
Memorandum of Understanding’ which will involve Poland acting as
the military counter intelligence agency for all matters
relating to activities in Russia – and by extension – China.
Romania has also been invited to play a role in this international
need to pause here in order to fully grasp the implications of these
maneuverings. What is being pushed through, with very few being
aware, is a major redistribution of military and geopolitical power
within Europe – and beyond.
effect, the US, Britain, France and Germany (NATO) will pull back
from doing the ongoing dirty work of ‘poking the Russian bear’ –
in an attempt to provoke it (Russia) into an act of serious
aggression – passing this job on to Poland, whose citizens have
been fully primed for this task by an endless stream of government
is strategic. The longstanding objective has been to implicate Russia
in a serious act of aggression which would, in turn, provide the
alibi for Western command forces to be put on what would be seen as a
‘legitimate’ permanent war-footing’ with the Russian
Federation. The objective being to break-up and destroy the Russian
Federation’s unity and coherence and to expand Western hegemonic
power and control ever further east: a key step in the further
imposition of A New World Order.
citizens have, both wittingly and unwittingly, allowed themselves to
become pawns in this new ‘cold war’, by singularly failing to
critique the US/NATO-inspired propaganda exercise obsessively pursued
by a bought-out Polish government. An exercise which vilifies Russia
as being ‘a major threat to world stability’, when in reality
there is a singular lack of credible evidence to lend any weight to
US led invasions – and decimation – of more than 30 countries
since the Second World War clearly establishes it – and its allies
– as the number one threat to world stability.
are witnessing a high stakes smokescreen. In plain words, Russia has
acted as a major brake on Western ambitions to establish a despotic
centralised regime, beyond the current borders of the EU. A regime
supported by the vast neoliberal banking conglomerates and the
military industrial project which carries-out their dirty work on the
ground and in the air.
now faces a further crisis of post World War Two occupation. Once
again by the West. The first Western incursion was set in motion by
the selling-off of key industries to outside corporate interests –
and what I call the Coca Colarisation’ of the country by US
interests. However, that slides into the background when compared to
the current crisis facing the country.
stand on the very brink of being forced to give up their sovereignty.
In doing so they will become pawns to the forces of a global New
World Order. A regime whose new HQ will be located in Europe, and
make strategic use of Poland – and Romania – as its ‘war
theatre’. While the US, UK, Germany and France pull back to avoid
being caught up in the front lines of this, their very own
belligerent, geopolitically motivated incitement to war.
is a critical need to raise our voices against this desperate act of
international terrorism. One which, if it should go ahead, will
greatly raise the stakes of provoking a major military confrontation.
is vital to realise that all this is happening without any
consultation or communication with citizens – who are being coldly
manipulated to act as cannon fodder to the warmongering ambitions of
a small minority of tyrannical power brokers.
am grateful to UK Column (www.uk
for the background material which informs the main body of this
Rose is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, a writer,
international activist and social entrepreneur. He is President of
The International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside.
is the author of two acclaimed titles: In
Defence of Life and Changing
Course for Life.
You can find out more on his website www.julianrose.info