Monday 18 January 2016

Something's up at Uummannaq Bay Greenland

Some kind of " event" has taken place in Uummannaq Bay Greenland after a sustained period of high anomaly weather. 

Robin Westenra and Sam Carana have been posting lately about temperatures above zero and rain in the Arctic in the winter for pitys sake!

Could it be a methane discharge that has disturbed the ice from below?

I'm only speculating but whatever it was events like this in the Arctic are always bad news.

Brace for imminent impact.

---Kevin Hester

What is Up in Disko-Uummannaq Bay Greenland January 9-16, 2016
Posted by Mauri Pelto

ilulissat webcam11-17-16

17 January, 2016

@TenneyNaumer contacted Alun Hubbard, Jason Box and I with an astute observation last evening. “But what I am getting at is that in general the temperature anomalies over the region of Jakobshavn have been high in the last few days, and I spotted weird temperatures off the coast via Climate Reanalyzer (which is seriously low resolution).  I just checked with the manati satellite (also seriously low resolution), and it seems some sort of event has taken place.”


Following up on what are typically good observations from Tenney I looked at the Radarsat-2 and Sentinel-1 imagery posted by the Danish Meteorological Institute.  Weather records from automatic weather stations in the region from PROMICE and the surface mass balance model results for the week from Polar Portal.


It is evident from the PROMICE weather records on the ice sheet just south of the Disko Bay region that temperatures have been exceptionally high since January 5th and atmospheric pressures have been high since January 9th.  The Polar Portal mass balance model indicates some actual declines/ablation in the last week. This is more likely sublimation from foehn conditions than actual melt.  The real changes are in the sea ice fronts and ice in the coastal inlets illustrated by MODIS. Below are images from January 9, 11, 13 and 16 for Disko Bay and January 9, 13 and 16 from Uummannaq Bay.

The arrow at location 1# is an area of sea ice across the fjord in front of Jakobshavn Glacier on January 9, that disappears by January 13. Location #2 is at the fjord mouth and location #3 is at the sea front south of Disko Island on January 9.  There is no real cloud cover evident in any of images.  Maybe low level fog in places. By January 11th a plume is sweeping from Point 2 towards Point 3. Notice the sea ice in the fjord disappears by January 13th and the ice front is pushed back in a concave fashion at Point #3. This indicates a clear push of water driving sea ice offshore. The Ilulissat Fjord mouth lack of ice is also evident in Webcam images from 1-16-16 and 1-17-16 at the Hotel Arctic, last images below with two boats plying the open water. on the 16th and icebergs clogging the fjord mouth on the 17th.  The Sentinel-1 image from January 16th shows a significant flushing of icebergs from Ilulissat Fjord, pointed out by black arrows.  This image has better clarity and with the icebergs scattered through the plume, indicate more clearly the plume is a water source change event, even if wind driven. The iceberg plume in the fjord has a brighter aspect due to the varied surface aspect-reflectance and has expanded down fjord.  The event must be due to or enhanced by strong offshore winds and @ruth_mottram indicates there was at least one foehn event. The plume indicates the ice melange in front of Jakobshavn has been largely removed.


In Uummannaq Bay a very similar sequence plays out, note on January 9 the sea ice connecting islands near #4.  By January 13th the ice at location #4 is gone.  The ice front is now at location #3, which on January 9th was well into the ice pack.  Again we have a clear push of water leading to a concave sea ice front that is pushed well offshore. Icebergs can be seen amidst plume on January 16th, the plume opacity and size has diminished since January 13h.

In both of the January 13th images there is a plume leading to the concave sea ice front, the question being is this sediment laden water, with the resultant higher reflectivity or is it a combination of a surface water change from wind or a combination. Jason Box suggests it is aeration of the surface water from the strong offshore winds. The ice must in part be driven back by a surface water push. You can see icebergs in sections of the plumes closer to shore suggesting this is a surface near surface phenomenon. This is a short term event.  However, it could have broader implications, Moon et al (2015) indicate the importance of a rigid ice melange at the front of tidewater outlet glaciers in Greenland.  In this case the ice melange in front of Jakobshavn has been removed, and probably from in front of other glaciers. I look forward to further insights from the community.


20160109s01disko
RADARSAT-2 IMAGE FROM Disko Bay  1/09/2016

20160111rs02disko
RADARSAT-2 IMAGE FROM Disko Bay  1/11/2016

20160113rs02disko
RADARSAT-2 IMAGE FROM Disko Bay  1/13/2016


Sentinel-1 imagery from 1-16-16 of Disko Bay-notice expanded brightness area in the fjord by #1.

20160109s01uummann
 Sentinel 1 imagery of Uummannaq Bay 1/09/2016

20160113rs02umman
RADARSAT-2 IMAGE FROM Uummannaq Bay MODIS 1/13/2016

20160116s01uumann
Sentinel 1 imagery of Uummannaq Bay  1/13/2016 plume size and opacity diminishing. 

illusiat webcam 1-16-2016
Ilulissat Fjord mouth webcam view 1-16-16.

ilulissat webcam11-17-16
Ilulissat Fjord mouth webcam view 1-17-16.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.